Experian met with LendIt Conference Chairman Peter Renton recently and during our talk he shared some valuable insights on marketplace lending and the growing Chinese peer-to-peer lending industry. Why do so excited about the Chinese peer-to-peer lending industry? I think there are two things, one is that it is massive, the Chinese market is so big it’s bigger than the rest of the world, combined. And so that, I think, it’s an opportunity for everybody, and western platforms and Chinese platforms. But that’s not all, I think one of the things I think is most interesting about China is how they use technology particularly in the mobile space. The way these platforms operate on the borrower acquisition side, on the investor side it’s all done through mobile. And that is very different to what’s done in the West, so we’ve got a lot to learn. The Chinese experience is probably 3 to 5 years ahead of what the West is going to be. We all talk about “Well, we are going to move to mobile eventually” but it hasn’t happened yet and you talk to most platforms and the still the majority of their traffic is coming from through the desktop so that’s not the case in China it’s something like 80% or 90% coming on mobile sometimes even more. Some companies have nothing other than mobile traffic, they don’t even have a website. That’s why I think China is interesting and we can really learn a lot from the Chinese. Will we start to see U.S. companies make investments in China? I think the first thing were going to see from U.S. companies is them trying to attract Chinese capital, that is already started we have already seen some Chinese capital coming in, there’s been publicly available information like with one of SoFi’s investors is a Chinese company. The Chinese are making more equity investments in this space, we’re also starting to see debt capital coming from China into the U.S., so that’s definitely I think one of the ways that we will be connecting the two countries. The other is eventually we’re probably down the road two to three years minimum we are going to see western platforms going to China and either buying a Chinese platform or starting operations there. We’ve seen all of the major banks have done that, China such a big market, it can’t be ignored. If you want to be a global player you have to be in China so I think that’s probably the secondary second step, the first step is attracting capital. Is the Chinese market primarily consumer lending or using lending to small business? So it’s similar to the U.S. where really the consumer lending sector has led the way in marketplace lending and I think the same thing is true in China. There is definitely small business lending in fact small business lending is probably even needed more in China than the West because small business owner’s, entrepreneurs in China have very few options when it comes to obtaining financing, so these platforms are setting up to really fill that massive void. What goal should marketplace lenders consider when partnering with traditional lenders? If you talk about traditional lenders if you are talking about banks I think that is something that we’re seeing more and more just at LendIt today we had a whole session on bank partnerships, there’s been several other mentions we had Avant’s Al Goldstein this morning talking about their new partnership with Regions Bank. Regions Bank is a top 20 bank in the U.S. I think what’s in it for the platforms obviously is, if you look at the Avant deal they get two things, they’re sort of licensing their technology and their underwriting box helping these banks reach difficult to obtain customers and underwrite customers in ways that a bank necessarily wouldn’t have the expertise to do. So they are doing that and then with Avant they’re also getting referrals so the bank may have people coming to them for loans that they can’t or won’t underwrite so then they can refer them on to Avant, so I think that’s the best example. You talk about the Chase OnDeck deal, I’ve spoken with Noah Breslow about that and he’s mentioned that it was a long process. Chase is the biggest bank in the country, they’ve got a massive compliance department, they had to check every single box and so I think platforms they really need to be like professional grade shall we say. All of their compliance systems – he said it took OnDeck many months to get up to the standard that Chase was comfortable with, so I think having that sort of rock-solid compliance in place it’s great for a platform not just by partnering with banks but dealing with regulators they can see that they are checking all the boxes just like a bank would. What can you tell us about the new Marketplace Lending Association? It’s something that I’ve been passionate about for a long time. We are probably a year or two overdue on having this association coming to be, but it’s better late than never. I think we really need to come together as an industry and have a unified voice when we’re dealing with Washington, dealing with lawmakers. Every industry that has an association that can be heard in Washington that represents the entire industry and I feel like, we just started, we just launched it a few days ago but I think it’s overdue and having that will help us not only just raise up the profile of the industry but really help us to talk directly with regulators and regulators aren’t going to say this is just one company with their own agenda this is the industry talking and they’ll pay more attention I think.
I sat down with Gavin Harding, Sr. Business Consultant with Experian who is attending American Banker’s Marketplace Lending & Investing Conference in New York City this week to get his perspectives. Interview with Gavin Harding Gary: Hello and good evening my name is Gary Stockton and I’m with Experian Business Information Services in Costa Mesa. I’m joined by Gavin Harding who is with our global consulting practice. Gavin is at the Marketplace Lending and Investing show in New York, Gavin how are you doing in New York? Gavin: Good evening Gary it’s good to be here. It’s a tremendous show this year. Very high-energy, very dynamic a little different to some conferences that we’ve participated in over the last couple of years. So some evolving themes. Two years ago, three years ago at this type of conference it was all about growth. Maybe a year ago it became more about regulation and compliance, kind of a more pragmatic approach. And this year it has evolved one more time into a core question of sustainability. How can marketplace lenders build a solid foundation that incorporates compliance, growth, risk, basic core principles of governance to make sure they become profitable and that they are still here in 3 to 5 years? So it’s really interesting to see those themes emerge over the last couple of years. Gary: So marketplace lenders it seems like they are getting their houses in order right? We’ve had a few things happen in the last six eight months that kind of rattled the industry but I think a lot of them have taken a step back from that rapid growth pace to get you know compliance and things like that in order, and a lot of them are pursuing partnerships with lenders right? Gavin: That’s right. So, some of the key drivers have changed over the last year have been some things in the news that kind of shook the industry up a little bit, caused both marketplace lenders themselves and the investment community and the banks and bank partners to stand back a little bit and pause, and address some really key fundamental questions. So, one of the questions, I want to take this from a bank perspective. There was a great program this morning. Four panelists - one banker and three marketplace lending lawyers, and the question was about the interaction between banks and marketplace lenders, and it was really interesting questions that were asked and one of them was, if every marketplace lender has its core competency, it’s target market, the thing it does differently and better than anybody else the differentiator, the key question for the bank partner is how real is that? How do we know? How do we document that? So there’s definitely more of a, it’s great to share the story with the bank partner, now the bank partner is saying that’s great I like the story, now let me show or let me see some evidence how it works, show me that you are adhering to your model consistently. Show me that you were documenting what you’re doing. Show me that you are being fair and disciplined in your credit decisions. Prove to me that when you say your portfolio is grade A+, that it actually is grade A+. So, not so much a skepticism, more a real life pragmatism to fully engage with the marketplace lender and to understand their model down to a granular level in terms of process, in terms of business governance, management practices and so on. So I see it as a convergence of the new innovative approaches of marketplace lenders, and the more traditional approaches of banking. So I see the two as coming together being more engaged and aligning more closely and again that overall pragmatic approach is prevailing. Gary: Are you seeing, last year there were a lot of international companies starting to come on the scene there were a number of Chinese marketplace lending companies, is that kind of still the case or is it pretty much domestic US marketplace lenders? Gavin: So with this particular event this year it seems it’s mainly U.S. based however there are some global players. I’m not seeing a lot of participants and attendees from Asia for instance where at prior events we would have seen more of them. Gary: And so looking at the agenda are there any sessions that you personally are looking forward to? Gavin: Today the one that really resonated with me was the session on bank partnerships, exactly how they can work and the one theme that was a central core statement from that is, compliance is now a price of entry. Compliance is not a want to have. The marketplace lender has to have solid documented procedures in place to have a conversation with a bank. This doesn’t mean that there needs to be an exact mirroring of the bureaucracy and really deep compliance processes in a bank, but it means that the marketplace lender has to understand the banks perspective, has to speak the banks language and needs to understand the regulations with which the bank is complying. That’s now the expectation from banks of their marketplace lending partners. And that changes the world significantly for them. There is a demand for better alignment and mutual understanding, high levels of transparency and the application of fundamental principles of management and good governance so for me that session today resonated. I think it was a long time coming, and it was good for the group to hear that. Gary: That’s great so you’re there tomorrow and you’re speaking at the conference right? Gavin: Tomorrow afternoon we have a session that should be pretty interesting, it’s a panel session and it is centered on building sustainability in your portfolio. Let me tell you kind of where that comes from and why we’re talking about this. So there has been over the last year and a half, a tightening in terms of the availability of capital for marketplace lenders, a heightening in the demand from investors and from bank partners and others, heightening in the demand for additional information and more granular data on what’s in the portfolio, portfolio content, predictive performance, risk profiles and so on and so forth. To continue to address those needs marketplace lenders need to look within their portfolio to add components in terms of reporting, in terms of upfront origination discipline, ongoing management so that as they approach partners to look at these portfolios and invest in them, the partners can gain a level of confidence that the portfolios are as presented. So tomorrow I will be speaking with two other panelists, one from the world of regulation compliance in an advisory capacity working for a law firm in DC with a long history of working in the regulatory and supervisory market. And the perspective of the other panelist is from a firm that assesses portfolios, stress tests portfolios, establishes valuations and so forth, again related to our conversation on investment, the investment community, the reduced availability in capital of capital and the demand for more information and then I’ll be giving some examples of some work we’ve done with clients in terms of trying to understand the portfolio. Of presenting the portfolio in industry-standard approaches, industry-standard scores, industry-standard analytical approaches that can help bridge a portfolio to the investment community, and help that investment community gain a level of comfort that they need. So I think it will be a lively discussion, I think we got some great diversity in the panelists, and from what I saw today I think the audience is going to be very engaged and ask some tough questions. Gary: That’s great so do you think you might have time tomorrow to give us another recap from the event? Gavin: I’d look forward to that. Gary: OK. Well I want to thank you for taking time out I know that you very busy there it’s in the evening so thanks for staying back and giving us your update and we’ll look forward to another chat tomorrow around the same time. Gavin: You’re welcome thank you Gary.
Simply put, online marketplace lending is here to stay. Virtually unheard of just 10 years ago, Web-based companies that offer funding options beyond traditional bank loans have grown considerably. Small businesses — drawn by the easy application process and flexible repayment terms, have become increasingly comfortable working with online lenders, which offer rapid access to capital, a wide array of niche products, and a low-friction customer experience. The lack of regulation and higher-than-market interest rates that often accompany these “alternative” loans have not deterred borrowers from trying this new source of business financing. Despite their growth, however, online lenders still make up only a small segment of the overall small-business loan market. While that paints a clear picture of the current online marketplace lending environment, what does the future hold? How is the industry, still in its infancy, likely to change as it responds to pressures from competitors, borrowers and regulators? Here are some trends we can expect to see over the next several years: Growth — As online lending becomes more mainstream, look for the industry to expand exponentially. In 2014, online lenders combined to issue loans totaling about $12 billion in the United States. In a recent report, Morgan Stanley said it expects the U.S. number to grow to $122 billion by 2020 and the global number to surpass $280 billion in the same time period. "Online marketplace lenders are still very small players relative to the overall market, but they’re growing fast. They could be very disruptive or an entirely new [source] of capital for both small businesses and consumers that aren’t necessarily serviced by larger banks.” James Francis Executive Vice President, Consumer Lending Group MUFG Union Bank N.A Participation — Exponential growth likely will be fueled by the growing acceptance of online lending by small businesses, especially those run by millennials comfortable with virtual transactions. As the customer base grows, look for competition to increase as both new and established lenders fight for the attention of this attractive market segment. "Small-business owners in general are increasingly turning to online options to seek capital. According to a recent study by the Fed, 20 percent of small-business owners sought a business loan online during the first half of 2014. Small businesses are using new technologies to manage their customers, process payments, handle point-of-sale — it makes sense they’d turn online for capital as well.” James Hobson Chief Operating Officer OnDeck Innovation — New, even more, efficient ways for borrowers to secure business loans — not to mention the nature of the financial products themselves — will continue to appear as competition drives innovation. Look for lenders to develop: Faster, more user-friendly interfaces along with algorithms that further accelerate the review and approval process Frictionless access Improved customer engagement and experience Platform and product innovation "Certainly there are more players in the space today, which is great because it pushes not only us but the category as a whole to generate more awareness, more credibility and better platforms to help small businesses. The category as a whole has been built on this idea of making things a little bit more simple and easy. We’re always asking, ‘How can we provide our offerings in a frictionless way and time-sensitive manner?” Jason Rockman Vice President, Brand Marketing CAN Capital "There are a lot of lenders offering similar products to the same customers. There will be more competition to offer more products, which is better for borrowers.” Meredith Wood Editor-in-Chief Fundera Consolidation — Industries often go through a period of hyper expansion followed by a period of consolidation as larger, better-financed players acquire smaller competitors and underperformers go out of business. One hundred years ago, more than 100 companies were making automobiles in the United States alone. Today, there are fewer than a half dozen. Twenty-five years ago, scores of companies were making personal computers. Today, a handful of brands dominate 90 percent of the market. We can expect the online marketplace lending sector to experience similar consolidation. Spillover — As online lending becomes increasingly mainstream, look for traditional lenders — particularly commercial banks — to enter the fray. Some forward-looking banks already are working directly with online marketplace lenders, referring customers based on their needs and qualifications or re-creating the frictionless look and feel of online lenders. Look for the dramatic differences between “traditional” and “alternative” lenders to blur in the coming years. "There are several key reasons why banks would want to partner with online lenders. The first is to drive customer retention. A bank says yes to small-business borrowers roughly 20 percent of the time based on their lending criteria. What happens to the other 80 percent? Banks don’t want to lose those customers. Partnering with marketplace lenders is one way to retain those customers and create a good user experience. “Customer loyalty is another driver. Access to capital does more to build loyalty than any other product or service. Finally, the biggest motivator is access to new technology and data, especially for institutions forward-thinking enough to recognize that there are opportunities for them to monetize their existing data as well as learn from the data analysis and data science that some of the more sophisticated marketplace players are executing.” Glenn Goldman CEO, Credibly Regulation — Regulation is on the horizon for the online lending industry. While the absence of regulation has facilitated rapid growth and innovation, this lack of oversight also has led to an environment in which some borrowers have complained of unfair lending practices and a lack of transparency. Most leading online lenders believe some kind of regulation is good for the industry. A set of rules and standards defines the playing field and provides the confidence and consistency the industry needs to grow sustainably. “Some government oversight is going to happen. It’s just a matter of time,” said Levi King, Founder and CEO of Nav (formerly Creditera), which was founded in 2012. “Small businesses are not sophisticated. There’s a lot of predatory lending extended to small-business owners, who are, as a rule, not sophisticated enough to know what’s happening.” “We believe it’s important to foster greater transparency in business lending marketing,” said Rebecca Shapiro, Director, Brand & Strategy, Funding Circle. Along with Fundera, Lending Club, Opportunity Fund and Accion, Funding Circle recently helped craft the Online Borrowers Bill of Rights, which attempts to establish ethical standards the industry can use to police itself. “We don’t assume the bill can replace government regulations. We do believe that, by encouraging responsible regulations, we’ll have a model for what the government should do,” said Shapiro. The Future Is Bright Customer engagement, access, frictionless applications, and a wide range of product choices are at the heart of the online marketplace lending industry. The mainstream banking industry is starting to take note, looking externally at possibilities for collaboration and internally at ways of updating systems and processes to improve the customer experience. Ethical standards and regulations will increase transparency, accountability, and consistency. If these trends continue, both the small-business owner and the economy will reap the benefits. The State of Marketplace Lending In 2008, a short two years after the first online marketplace lenders opened for business, the Great Recession began to wreak havoc on worldwide financial markets. Small businesses struggled to survive, banks failed and access to capital was limited. More online lenders saw an opportunity and opend for business. These technology-driven newcomers hired an army of data scientists, coders and digital marketers. In the fall of 2015 the innovation, industry disruption and regulatory uncertainty that characterize this dynamic sector led Experian to produce a series of articles focusing on different aspects of online marketplace lending. This report contains those articles. Download eBook Related articles Just how alternative are today’s online marketplace lenders? How online marketplace lenders are changing the rules of small-business finance Self-Regulatory Program for Nonbank Small Business Lenders Top regulatory priorities for commercial lenders Playing to Your Strength - Opportunities for Regional Banks to Build Better Lending Portfolios Game Changer - How Marketplace Platforms Are Bringing Financial Institutions Back to Small-Business Lending Marketplace Matchmakers - How Loan Aggregators Bring Borrowers and Lenders Together New Frontiers - What's Next For Marketplace Lending?
Marketplace lending has become a dynamic source of small-business financing. In 2013, marketplace lenders funded customers to the tune of about $3 billion, twice the volume from the previous year. These numbers are expected to continue to rise steeply throughout the rest of the decade as customers become increasingly comfortable with the concept. Operating almost exclusively via the Internet, thesefintech companies can be particularly helpful to newer, less-established retailers, such as restaurants and B2B service companies that don’t have the documented track record that most traditional banks prefer. These alternate financing sources also can be an excellent resource for smaller loans in the $5,000 to $200,000 range. Larger banks often are reluctant to consider smaller business loans. Business owners looking for quick access to capital have a wide variety of sources to choose from: Nonprofit lenders Invoice financing Online business loans Loan aggregators Peer-to-peer financing Crowdfunding But how can potential borrowers locate these new lenders? When it comes to matching small-business borrowers to the most appropriate lenders, a new breed of marketplace matchmaker or loan aggregator is finding success bringing the two parties together. Aggregators compare the needs and qualifications of borrowers with lenders in their network matching their target criteria. Think of it as speed dating for business financing. Organic Online Searches Not surprisingly, many online lenders rely on technology to find potential customers. Common online marketing tactics include pay per click and search engine optimization (SEO). “Most of our customers come from the Internet itself,” confirmed Meredith Wood, Editor in Chief of Fundera, an aggregator for about 30 individual marketplace lenders. Founded in early 2014, Fundera has helped more than 1,200 small businesses acquire loans totaling more than $60 million this year. “We do paid acquisition and also use content to generate organic searches. We rank well for competitive terms like ‘business loans.’” Nav (formerly Creditera), founded in 2012, is another successful fintech company, offering an array of commercial financial services, including credit cards, credit card processing and small-business loans. Like Fundera, Nav relies on SEO for many of its leads. “Of all the lead channels we have, SEO organic is the most difficult to get going,” said Levi King, Founder and CEO of Nav. “You’re competing for attention with millions of other people. But while it’s the slowest channel, it also tends to yield leads of super high quality. The people who find us organically are looking for what we offer.” Social Media Social media is one tool being used more frequently in Web-based marketing. Using advanced algorithms, marketplace lenders can target ads directly at businesses that fit a specific profile. “We use Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn — anywhere small businesses are showing up and you can target them effectively,” King explained. “Small-business owners behave a lot like consumers. Their business and personal communications are almost identical. While social media is a great way to connect with this market, it’s definitely not the way you’d market to enterprises.” Referrals Referrals are another significant and valuable source of customer leads and tend to come from one of two principal sources: Other funding sources — Often, a lender, such as a bank, that is unable or unwilling to write a loan for a small business will refer that business to an alternative lender with more flexible requirements. Banks generally refer customers only to companies they have worked with before and have established credibility in terms of reputation, integrity and professionalism. Lenders that make referrals under these circumstances usually do so as a courtesy and receive no fee or other consideration for their efforts. Their intent is to cultivate good relationships with customers who may someday migrate to more traditional banking services. Satisfied customers — Perhaps the most valuable referrals are those that come from other business owners who already have received loans from a particular marketplace lender. Getting referrals from friends, relatives and business acquaintances sets a customer’s mind at ease and helps the customer overcome the hesitation and anxiety sometimes associated with dealing with a new company. Partnerships and Aggregators Many marketplace lenders have developed formal partnerships with companies or with other lenders that provide them with customer referrals. Unlike the casual referrals discussed above, these often involve fees or other consideration as part of a contracted business arrangement. For example, Fundera works with FTD® to help their florists find financing. “Borrowers complete one aggregated application that we send off to various lenders,” said Wood. “We present the offers we receive to the borrowers and work through them together so they understand what each offer means, what they really cost, etc.” The Future of Online Lending Not surprisingly, both Wood and King are bullish on the future of marketplace lending. Wood in particular sees the option as being very attractive to young people who have some experience in the business world and now are ready to start companies of their own. The online marketplace lending industry is growing by leaps and bounds. Fintech companies continue to rapidly innovate, developing niche products and efficient data-driven marketing approaches. At the same time, the banking sector remains the dominant source of funding for small businesses, with close community ties and deep customer relationships. Fintechs and banks are beginning to explore ways to work together to make the most of what each brings to the small-business funding market. Regulators are engaging with the online marketplace lending industry and considering factors related to disclosure, transparency and lending practices. The outcome for small businesses is increased choice, information and access. That is good news for them and for the economy. The State of Marketplace Lending In 2008, a short two years after the first online marketplace lenders opened for business, the Great Recession began to wreak havoc on worldwide financial markets. Small businesses struggled to survive, banks failed and access to capital was limited. More online lenders saw an opportunity and opend for business. These technology-driven newcomers hired an army of data scientists, coders and digital marketers. In the fall of 2015 the innovation, industry disruption and regulatory uncertainty that characterize this dynamic sector led Experian to produce a series of articles focusing on different aspects of online marketplace lending. This report contains those articles. Download eBook Related articles Just how alternative are today’s online marketplace lenders? How online marketplace lenders are changing the rules of small-business finance Self-Regulatory Program for Nonbank Small Business Lenders Top regulatory priorities for commercial lenders Playing to Your Strength - Opportunities for Regional Banks to Build Better Lending Portfolios Game Changer - How Marketplace Platforms Are Bringing Financial Institutions Back to Small-Business Lending Marketplace Matchmakers - How Loan Aggregators Bring Borrowers and Lenders Together New Frontiers - What's Next For Marketplace Lending?
In the wake of the Great Recession, numerous entrepreneurs began to use online lending platforms to offer capital funding programs, short-term loans and other business-to-business (B2B) credit plans to small-business owners who were otherwise unable to do business with traditional banks. Today, much has changed, and "marketplace lending" has grown with loans coming in a wide variety of types, sizes, lengths and terms. The characteristics marketplace lenders tend to share include: An easy application process facilitated by Web-based platforms Fast approvals, often within 24–48 hours Higher-than-normal Annual Percentage Rates to compensate for the market’s higher risks The absence of state or federal regulation The borrowers also share similar characteristics: They are often small, relatively young companies (between one and five years in business) Many are retailers, such as stores and restaurants, or B2B service companies, such as marketing and advertising agencies They have strong cash flow As an industry, marketplace lending has enjoyed considerable success over the past five years. In some entrepreneurial circles, names such as Lending Club, Fundera, Creditera and Funding Circle are as well-known as Citibank, Bank of America and Wells Fargo. According to a recent report from Morgan Stanley, in 2014 marketplace lenders issued a combined $12 billion in loans in the United States and more than $24 billion worldwide. Morgan Stanley expects that activity to grow to $122 billion and $280 billion, respectively, by 2020. Granted, such numbers are modest compared to the $15 trillion controlled by the total U.S. financial sector, but the market is large, fast-growing and has gained the attention of many “traditional” financial institutions. Many full-service banks see these newer online platforms as opportunities to increase their own efficiencies as well as a way to capture future long-term customers. Union Bank Partners With Lending Club to Expand Opportunities MUFG Union Bank N.A, a large financial institution that operates 398 full-service branches throughout California, Oregon and Washington, recently partnered with Lending Club, the San Francisco–based peer-to-peer lending company founded in 2006. “Our relationship started as an investment,” said Donald Stroup, Chief Credit Officer for MUFG Union Bank N.A. Retail Banking group. “We have not been in the credit card business for many years and have had no exposure in auto finance or student lending. Lending Club offered us an opportunity for diversification, for expanding our banking services and for products that could help us broaden our household penetration.” James Francis, Executive Vice President for MUFG Union Bank, N.A. Consumer Lending Group, also noted, “Online lenders are still very small players relative to the overall market, but they're growing fast. Banks have a great deal of flexibility when it comes to working with marketplace lenders. Investors, such as banks, can pick and choose where they want to play; for example, we decided to purchase high-end consumer paper from Lending Club. Because it operates throughout the United States, we can purchase from Texas and New York, and not just the West Coast. Lending Club is very transparent with its criteria, so we know where the loans originate.” Both Francis and Stroup believe that full-service banks can learn from marketplace lenders when it comes to speed, convenience and electronic applications. This is particularly true when it comes to working with millennials, many of whom are far more comfortable with the online environment than they are with brick-and-mortar establishments. “Businesses may begin by shopping for cheap loans online, but once a business reaches a certain size and complexity, it looks to one provider to handle all its needs,” Francis added. “In addition to simple capital lending, this can include cash management, investments, liquidity, stock ownership plans, estate planning, etc. Online marketplace lending companies can't provide that broad array of services and relationships. It takes a traditional bank to do that.” While acknowledging the success marketplace lenders have had connecting with a segment of the market that for a time was underserved, Francis remains concerned about its resilience and longevity. “This is still a largely untested business model," he noted. “Having been born out of the Great Recession, marketplace lending hasn’t gone through a complete business cycle. It will be interesting to see how these lenders perform in a down cycle. I suspect that, in a down market, these lenders will have a harder time funding loans. Investors may get skittish when they see the lower returns that will inevitably occur.” Despite their concerns, both Stroup and Francis remain open to exploring further opportunities in marketplace lending. MUFG Union Bank N.A. is just one of many large financial institutions now exploring partnerships with online lending concerns. We expect these alliances to become increasingly common over the next two to three years, with new synergies creating more markets and opportunities, for borrowers and lenders alike. Related articles Just how alternative are today’s online marketplace lenders? How online marketplace lenders are changing the rules of small-business finance Self-Regulatory Program for Nonbank Small Business Lenders Top regulatory priorities for commercial lenders Playing to Your Strength - Opportunities for Regional Banks to Build Better Lending Portfolios Game Changer - How Marketplace Platforms Are Bringing Financial Institutions Back to Small-Business Lending Marketplace Matchmakers - How Loan Aggregators Bring Borrowers and Lenders Together New Frontiers - What's Next For Marketplace Lending?
This week, we invited Charles H. Green to offer his perspectives on the online marketplace lending sector. Charles is Managing Director of Small Business Finance Institute, which provides professional training to commercial lenders for banks and nonbanks. He has written extensively about the marketplace lending sector, including the recent Banker’s Guide to New Small Business Finance (John Wiley & Sons, 2014). Earlier in his career, he founded and served as President/CEO of Sunrise Bank of Atlanta. The evolution of commercial lending over the past seven years has certainly had its share of ups and downs. Remember the ominous days leading up to the financial crisis when it seemed like everything was teetering on collapse? In the end, and more than five hundred bank failures later, the economy found a very slow path back to growth. During that uncertain time, commercial lenders took a lot of criticism from several directions. Regulators were skeptical of the risk level that lenders accepted, borrowers argued when their credit score did not qualify them for a loan and seemingly everyone else had an opinion on how long it took to turn lending volumes around. On top of those worries, a new channel emerged, “online marketplace lending.” These new lenders funded loans from technology platforms that turned around loan applications in very short order, seeming to best banks at their own game. Fast forward several years, and traditional lending has had plenty to cheer about, even if not recognized in the broader economy. The bank failures largely have been resolved, making some of the healthy surviving banks much larger and eliminating some competitors in many markets. Additionally, bank profits are back up as balance sheets have been mostly cleared of underperforming credits, with a renewed focus on good underwriting and solid risk management. Banks Have Advantages This new phenomenon known as online marketplace lending has grown dramatically on the strength of loans that traditional banks have had difficulty serving in the past: small, unsecured working capital loans to service and retail businesses. By performing the sorely needed task of scaling smaller business loans, online marketplace lenders have strengthened many small companies that were otherwise unable to secure financing from banks. However, banks never lost their core strength: their customers. While deregulation gave rise to competitors from a long list of bank services and products, few small-business owners left their banks behind entirely. During the crisis, many companies flocked back to the safety of the federally insured deposit system. Online marketplace lenders may augment but never replace those kinds of relationships. Another advantage large banks have is a strong tie with local businesses. While online lenders can respond quickly to application requests with the latest digital efficiency, their capacity to forge direct relationships is often limited to the term of their outstanding loan. Once repaid, they must restart the cycle to convince clients to borrow again. Banks, on the other hand, offer dozens of products and services that can help small business owners manage everything from business finances, household purchases, retirement savings, auto loans, safe deposit boxes, etc. Most online lenders offer a shorter product list, with options intended to serve a specific customer demographic. Perhaps the most significant advantage banks carry is their degree of flexibility. While online marketplace lenders can leverage the many benefits of a digital platform, there is often only one way to apply for a loan. Many online lenders lose business when an applicant falls outside their parameters. Finally, banks offer flexibility to negotiate around certain conditions or requirements that may bear consideration of alteration. There are people at various levels who can waive some rules or make exceptions when warranted. Given their similarities (looking for business among the same customer prospects) and differences (average loan size, structure and underwriting), banks and online marketplace lenders have the perfect opportunity to forge cooperative arrangements to exchange business. Imagine there is a bank president with a 50 percent loan-to-deposit ratio who is starved for a larger book of earning assets. Perhaps he needs assets from some areas that came up weak in his Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) examination? Maybe his loan product mix is too heavily reliant on big Commercial Real Estate (CRE) loans, but he struggles to book small credits profitably due to the boarding cost? What if he could go to a trusted online marketplace dashboard and search for loans to buy based on a transparent credit grading matrix, with adequate returns commensurate with the risk? Maybe he could even target specific ZIP™ codes to invest funds in places he is lacking market presence. Small-business loans, consumer loans, student loans — they’re all there, and more lines are on the way. Online lenders are nonbank entities that finance much in the same way as banks. A considerable portion of their capital must be invested in their proprietary digital capacity, so when lending grows, many are scrambling for funding. Most of them fund this volume with either revolving lines of credit, securitization or by selling off loans/portfolios to investors. The interesting part is that nothing should stop a commercial bank from participating in any of these activities. There are plenty of opportunities for banks to engage with the marketplace for profitable results with manageable risk. Banks can buy portfolios or loans, refer loan applicants, use the online lender’s proprietary technology to underwrite and fund certain loans, or participate with lender finance, which has been a common practice for alternative lenders for decades. Each type of financial institution has its own inherent advantages. However, playing to the strengths of the online marketplace and banks alike enables both types of entities to open new pockets of opportunity — a situation that may lead to a faster path for economic growth. Related articles Just how alternative are today’s online marketplace lenders? How online marketplace lenders are changing the rules of small-business finance Self-Regulatory Program for Nonbank Small Business Lenders Top regulatory priorities for commercial lenders Playing to Your Strength - Opportunities for Regional Banks to Build Better Lending Portfolios Game Changer - How Marketplace Platforms Are Bringing Financial Institutions Back to Small-Business Lending Marketplace Matchmakers - How Loan Aggregators Bring Borrowers and Lenders Together New Frontiers - What's Next For Marketplace Lending?
Online lenders represent a valuable resource for small businesses in need of working capital. Also known as "alternative" lenders, they are particularly useful to new businesses lacking the long, detailed credit history that banks and traditional lenders usually require to underwrite a commercial loan. This is why online lenders have become so popular with newer restaurants, small retailers, young business service companies and other enterprises that have no other place to go for working capital. Being unregulated, online lenders can be far more lenient with their lending requirements. However, online lenders don’t lend blindly. They don’t base their decisions on a catchy name and an inspiring mission statement. Online lenders have numerous sources of data upon which to base their decisions; as you might imagine, many of these sources are as "non-traditional" as the lenders themselves. For example, there are many names people use to describe the new types of data online lenders use to qualify applicants, such as “Big Data,” “alternative data” and “online data.” Essentially, they all mean the same thing: Readily available information that can be used to determine a business' financial health above and beyond traditional credit scores. New Data Sources for Online Lenders In addition to checking accounts and tax returns, online lenders may use any number of alternative sources of data to evaluate potential borrowers, including: Social Media. What customers say about a business on various social sites offer more important clues as to a business' health. A business with high ratings from a large number of customers may be a good risk, even if it's only been in business for one or two years. Online Financial Activity. Heavy activity on sites like PayPal or Ebay can suggest a healthy cash flow, something that's important to many online lenders. Permissioned access to business checking account information also allows lenders to better assess cash flow. Accounting Software. Having direct access to a borrower's accounting software (e.g. QuickBooks, FreshBooks) allows a potential lender to observe and track a borrower's financial activity in real time. Such data can also provide a lender with an early warning signal should the borrower suddenly get into trouble. Shipping Data. If a borrower is a retailer, whether B2B or B2C, are its products moving? Shipping data -- both volume and frequency -- is another valuable indicator of financial stability. Privacy & Security Issues How do online lenders capture this data, particularly the proprietary information not readily available through a Google search or social media? They get it straight from the borrower. When a business owner agrees to an online loan, they're often agreeing to provide the lender direct access to their business checking, accounting and management system. And sometimes not just for a one-time look, either. This may involve long-term access so the lender can keep an eye on its investment. The downside to this arrangement is, of course, privacy and security vulnerabilities. The upside is that it may help expedite future borrowing. Interpretation is Critical Of course, data by itself does not tell the whole story; it must be properly interpreted. This is particularly true of alternative data. For example, the ratings a restaurant receives on social media can't be judged against ratings for a dry cleaner. A restaurant in any city is likely to get far more social media coverage than is a neighborhood dry cleaner. However, a dry cleaner with just two or three reviews may be a far better business risk than a restaurant with 10. It's all about being able to interpret, normalize and glean insights from the data you collect. Packaging Online Data for Risk Assessment Five years ago, Experian created its Global Data Laboratory in San Diego for the express purpose of mining alternative data and seeing if it could be packaged as a commercial product to help online lenders and other companies evaluate new, small companies. Staffed with a team of Ph.D.’s in data science, the lab has built a one thousand (1,000) terabyte database containing information from thousands of sources. "One of the big challenges any lender faces is determining if a borrower is legitimate. This is true even for traditional businesses, like a Home Depot that may want to open a credit line with a small contractor that has little or no credit history. For every 100 companies that are 'invisible' to lenders, we can now establish the legitimacy of 20 businesses using nothing but online sources. That means a business can now have as much as 20 percent more customers than before just by accessing this alternative data. The lab's new algorithms are also highly predictive of a company's longevity.” Eric Haller EVP Experian Data Labs For new and emerging businesses, leveraging data from the Web can deliver a 40 percent lift in predictive performance compared to the industry averages for predicting whether a company will go out of business or not. Just Part of the Equation As useful as alternative data is, it’s just part of the algorithm an online lender uses to score borrowers. Traditional credit scores are usually still part of the evaluation process. When available, nothing predicts credit risk better than credit history. Even the most sophisticated online lenders are still going to look at trade experience, business registrations and other third-party information. Alternative data sources become just one part of the equation. New sources of customer information and readily available online data, combined with traditional data and metrics – and the experience necessary to properly interpret both – has created a robust online financial marketplace and gives small business owners unparalleled access, flexibility and choice when it comes to capital financing. While it's still a bit like the Wild West, the world of online lending continues to grow robustly. Through the use of Big Data, Experian is able to provide insights that help minimize risks for borrowers and lenders alike. That helps everyone. Related articles Just how alternative are today’s online marketplace lenders? How online marketplace lenders are changing the rules of small-business finance Self-Regulatory Program for Nonbank Small Business Lenders Top regulatory priorities for commercial lenders Playing to Your Strength - Opportunities for Regional Banks to Build Better Lending Portfolios Game Changer - How Marketplace Platforms Are Bringing Financial Institutions Back to Small-Business Lending Marketplace Matchmakers - How Loan Aggregators Bring Borrowers and Lenders Together New Frontiers - What's Next For Marketplace Lending?
The Responsible Business Lending Coalition — a group of nonbank small-business lenders — announced a self-regulatory program during August that is designed to bring greater clarity and consistency to its industry’s pricing and consumer protections. The Small Business Borrower’s Bill of Rights outlines six primary principles that those signing the pledge will abide by when lending to small businesses. They include: The right to transparent pricing and terms, including a right to see an annualized interest rate and all fees The right to non-abusive products, so that borrowers don’t get trapped in a vicious cycle of expensive reborrowing The right to responsible underwriting, so that borrowers are not placed in loans they are unable to repay The right to fair treatment from brokers, so that borrowers are not steered into the most expensive loans The right to inclusive credit access, without discrimination The right to fair collection practices, to prevent harassment and unfair treatment “Online loans with shorter terms, and high-priced loans have a higher degree of creating debt traps,” explained Conor French, director of legal & regulatory for Funding Circle, one of the coalition's founding members. “Borrowers in the online market need to be able to make an apples-to-apples comparison between lenders and between loans. We wanted to create a choice architecture that allows borrowers to see similar information.” Adoption of Industry Best Practices Helps Establish Clear Rules of the Road The adoption of self-regulatory standards by this group of small-business lenders is an important step in proactively addressing some of the concerns that policymakers may have about this emerging market. It also is vital to helping provide transparency and assurance to small-business owners that rely on affordable access to capital to start and operate a business. Non-bank small business lenders often fall outside some of the regulatory framework that regulated entities must meet. However, as new innovative underwriting solutions will sometimes incorporate the consumer credit history of the business owner or entrepreneur, the line between consumer and business regulation can get blurred. The self-regulatory pledge incorporates many of the themes that have been part of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s push for transparency across the consumer financial marketplace, including the short-term lending market. "Online loans with shorter terms, and high-priced loans have a higher degree of creating debt traps.” Conor French Director of Legal & Regulatory Funding Circle “Abuses can come from lenders, brokers or other unsavory players,” French noted. “For example, if you're using a broker or partner, are there conflicts of interest? Are they arranging the deal that’s best for you or best for them? Only by having open transparency can you understand what your options truly are. You can't just accept what someone else chooses for you at face value.” Self-Regulation Shows Self-Discipline and Addresses Evolving Public Policy Priorities Industry self-regulatory standards, such as the Borrower’s Bill of Rights, can be a good way for market leaders to demonstrate self-discipline by responding to the evolving public policy priorities of legislators and regulators. Industry self-regulation can be preferable to legislative or regulatory changes in some cases because it is flexible and can accommodate evolving market trends and consumer expectations. This is especially true when considering markets where innovative, disruptive technology and products are being developed, such as that of small business lending and peer-to-peer markets. The fact is that the development of regulations takes considerable time. Self-regulation can change more quickly as technology and markets evolve and mature. Industry self-regulation can help to provide transparency and protect consumers without impeding innovation. “Ultimately, I think government regulation of this market is inevitable,” French conceded. “But, we don't know when it will happen, who will write the standards or who will manage enforcement. We believe by encouraging responsible self-regulation, we're not only forestalling federal involvement, but also creating a model for what the government should do should it step in.” Gaining Critical Mass and Ensuring Accountability There are challenges when it comes to ensuring the effectiveness of a robust industry self-regulation regime. First, it can be difficult to have entities outside of the industry leaders to adopt and abide by the best practices. For small and medium-sized entities, the development of self-regulation may seem like a barrier to growth. Demonstrating the need and value of industry self-regulation to all market participants, regardless of size or market share, is essential. Another key hurdle is that any industry self-regulation must be accompanied by clear and well-respected accountability measures. Self-regulatory pledges are only as good as the accountability measures that ensure compliance. Without being held responsible for meeting industry best practices, regulators are unlikely to take the self-regulation seriously and may be more willing to cite the need for new regulation to address a market failure. However, accountability measures that have real teeth and oversight from a third party, such as a trade association, help to ensure that the industry takes the matter seriously and additional action from regulators is unnecessary. “Our Small Business Borrower’s Bill of Rights is currently being enforced by the Small Business Majority, a nationally recognized nonprofit organization,” French stated. “Having third-party endorsement helps avoid any conflicts of interest. As for actual penalties, we believe that reputational risk is quite significant.” Experian has experience implementing industry best practices Experian has considerable experience with the adoption of industry best practices across all of our businesses. Most notably, we worked closely with our competitors and clients to develop and implement enforceable self-regulation for the digital marketing industry. The Digital Advertising Alliance’s (DAA) self-regulatory regime has allowed for innovation and growth to continue, while at the same time enhancing transparency and consumer protection. Since its inception, there have been more than 50 million unique visitors to the DAA program websites, where consumers have been able to not only exercise their choice to opt-out of digital advertising, but also receive detailed education about the program. Experian looks forward to working with clients in the online marketplace lending segment as they implement the Borrower’s Bill of Rights in an effort to improve transparency and understanding of this market. Related articles Just how alternative are today’s online marketplace lenders? How online marketplace lenders are changing the rules of small-business finance Self-Regulatory Program for Nonbank Small Business Lenders Top regulatory priorities for commercial lenders Playing to Your Strength - Opportunities for Regional Banks to Build Better Lending Portfolios Game Changer - How Marketplace Platforms Are Bringing Financial Institutions Back to Small-Business Lending Marketplace Matchmakers - How Loan Aggregators Bring Borrowers and Lenders Together New Frontiers - What's Next For Marketplace Lending?
This week, we invited Charles H. Green to offer his perspectives on the online marketplace lending sector. The following article is his contribution to our series on marketplace lending. The phrase “man bites dog” is an aphorism in journalism that describes how an unusual, infrequent event (such as a man biting a dog) is more likely to be reported as news than an ordinary occurrence with similar consequences, such as a dog biting a man. In other words, an event is considered more newsworthy if there is something unusual about it. Thus, the headline above likely will draw more attention than the same story with the headline “Hedge fund offers to refinance consumer loans for 7 percent APR.” While both parties might actually own a portion of the same loan portfolio in today’s “sharing economy,” known in financial services as “peer-to-peer lending,” this kind of loan is one of many that have evolved on the Internet under the new financial industry sector labeled “marketplace lending.” Online marketplace lenders, funders, and investors have caused quite a stir over the past couple of years by offering alternative financing products and platforms to serve consumers and businesses that may have trouble securing a loan from traditional financial services, i.e., banks. But what’s so radically different about what they do, other than using a Website rather than a drive-up branch to initiate a financial relationship? After all, don’t both extend money to another party with strings attached — that is, conditions about who gets the money, how much and when they promise to repay it, as well as the consequences if they don’t? It seems like a better “alternative” would be to simply win the lottery! In fact, there is plenty of “alternative” in alternative lending, and in a relatively short period of time, the results have been phenomenal for consumers and businesses alike. What’s so different? For starters, the submission process for loan applications varies greatly. Due to supervisory oversight of the industry and a conservative lending culture, applying for a bank loan often means that a more complete disclosure of personal and business information is required. The aftereffects of the Great Recession and housing bubble meant that many banks curtailed most lending altogether until their balance sheets recovered, On the flip side, online lenders process applications with very little information —generally about 40 data points. This is because these lenders leverage the information and often ask for a borrower’s authorization to gain access to the cloud, where they can acquire more data on a borrower. Furthermore, online lenders have a narrow focus on where they are willing to lend money, so their decision analytics focus more precisely on a smaller set of information that really determines the risk for that particular type of loan. This leads us to how online lenders make credit decisions. Most use proprietary algorithms that weigh various data collected from a borrower’s application and reach a decision based on the numerical score produced at that time. There’s little human intervention to sway the verdict positively or negatively since the decision matrix was developed by testing millions of blind data files with historical loan outcomes to measure and manage their exposure to credit loss. There are plenty more differences in the online lenders’ approach, but probably none more important than the customer experience. Online loan applications can be submitted 24-7, and a borrower will be “conditionally qualified” or declined usually within minutes. Final credit approval often comes within a couple of hours, and funding might be in 48 to 72 hours. How can they do it? The answer lies primarily within four factors: 1) These companies are driven by innovation, with technology used to address many aspects that we don’t like about traditional lending; 2) Online lenders are not banks, and as such, they are relatively free of the regulation that comes with accepting public deposits to fund their operations; and 3) By focusing on a smaller niche of prospective borrowers, online lenders don’t try to be everything to everybody but rather specialize to serve a smaller set of clients better. 4) These companies have developed niche products to satisfy the particular needs of each market. What happens next? Is the end of commercial banks as we know them at hand? No. While the rise of online marketplace lending has been meteoric and the industry climbed to an admirable $9 billion of funding in 2014, it is a very small portion of the trillions of dollars funded by traditional banking today. Still, what they do is attract plenty of attention in the trade. Expect to hear more about strategic partnerships, acquisitions, and other flattering forms of imitation, as the banking industry will adopt and adapt many of the inspiring improvements brought by the online marketplace lending sector. Both sides will win, but the real prize goes to consumers and small-business owners who will have a more robust and competitive environment to get financing capital in the years ahead. About Charles H. Green Charles is Managing Director of Small Business Finance Institute, which provides professional training to commercial lenders for banks and nonbanks. He has written extensively about the marketplace lending sector, including the recent Banker’s Guide to New Small Business Finance (John Wiley & Sons, 2014). Earlier in his career, he founded and served as President/CEO of Sunrise Bank of Atlanta. Related articles Just how alternative are today’s online marketplace lenders? How online marketplace lenders are changing the rules of small-business finance Self-Regulatory Program for Nonbank Small Business Lenders Top regulatory priorities for commercial lenders Playing to Your Strength - Opportunities for Regional Banks to Build Better Lending Portfolios Game Changer - How Marketplace Platforms Are Bringing Financial Institutions Back to Small-Business Lending Marketplace Matchmakers - How Loan Aggregators Bring Borrowers and Lenders Together New Frontiers - What's Next For Marketplace Lending?