Claims & Contract Management

When it comes to medical coding and billing, accuracy is everything. Even the smallest error can result in a claim being bounced back by the payer, causing delays and missed revenue opportunities. Coding requirements change frequently, and with denials totaling billions of dollars per year, providers can’t afford to risk under- or over-coding or relying on outdated codes. Automation and software-driven solutions can uncomplicate the complex world of medical coding. Getting claims right the first time accelerates the adjudication process, leading to faster and higher reimbursements. Providers can make more reliable financial forecasts, avoid losing time reworking rejected claims, and give patients greater clarity about what they’ll owe. For this reason, providers should brush up on medical coding and billing best practices to improve claims management and maximize reimbursements. Here are 7 areas to focus on: 1. Stay up-to-date with coding changes Medical codes convert information about the patient’s healthcare encounter into an electronic format that payers use to adjudicate claims for reimbursement. If a claim includes outdated, incorrect or missing codes, then it will be denied. The most common medical coding systems include: International Classification of Disease 10th edition (ICD-10) codes: these codes denote the patient’s diagnosis or condition. The 11th version was published in January 2022, and while the implementation timeline in the US remains unclear, providers will need to be ready to adapt. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes: Where ICD codes describe the patient’s symptoms, CPT codes record their treatment. If there’s a discrepancy between diagnosis and treatment, the claim is likely to be denied. Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes: the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) use these to apply CPT codes to procedures, services, products and equipment offered to Medicaid and Medicare patients and those covered by private insurance. These codes are constantly being revised and are often recycled, so coders must pay close attention to avoid errors. National Drug Code (NDC): claims need to include NDC codes when the patient is taking prescribed or over-the-counter medications. The NDC directory is updated daily. Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) codes: these combine ICD and CPT codes to determine the final amount that a hospital can be reimbursed. CMS assigns annually calculated weightings to DRGs based on severity and length of illness, treatment trends and other factors. There are also multiple coding directories for different specialties, such as dental care, mental health and patients with disabilities. With hundreds of thousands of constantly-changing codable terms to consider, medical coders face a daunting task. In the past, coders would rely on manual coding directories to find the right codes, but today, most use digital encoders and digital coding libraries to generate electronic codes. For example, Experian Health’s claims management software integrates government and payer edits so that no changes to coding requirements are missed. Each patient encounter can be processed in real time and incorrect codes can be flagged before the claim is submitted. 2. Automate the claims management process to increase medical billing and coding accuracy Manually matching each patient encounter to a specific set of codes is time-consuming and vulnerable to errors. Software programs improve the process by analyzing unstructured clinical charts and notes to draw out information relevant to the claim. They can cross-reference multiple coding directories in an instant to identify the correct code. They also compile data in standardized, interoperable formats so information can be exchanged between coding and billing teams, clearinghouse staff and payer systems with ease. While some of the output generated by machine learning systems still needs to be checked by human eyes, automated solutions drastically reduce the burden on staff and ensure greater accuracy. With automated claims management, medical coding and billing teams can optimize their workflows, submit cleaner claims, and get insights into the root causes of denials. Case study: see how Summit Medical Group Oregon – Bend Memorial Clinic used automated claims management technology to achieve a primary clean claims rate of 92%. 3. Eliminate workflow inefficiencies to save time According to the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH), automation could save more than an hour of staff time for every three claim status checks. Automation frees up staff to focus on the highest priority tasks that require a human touch. Fewer errors mean less time spent on reworking denied claims. And if claims are processed more quickly, this means that they reach the payer adjudication stage sooner which ultimately will result in faster payments. The medical coding and billing process takes anywhere from a week to a few months, so every hour saved makes a difference. To this end, Enhanced Claim Status monitors how claims are progressing through the claims adjudication process, reducing the amount of time staff need to spend interacting with payers. It eliminates manual follow-up and allows teams to address pending, returned, denied and zero-pay transactions before the Electronic Remittance Advice and Explanation of Benefits are processed. Worklists are generated based on actionable data so staff can work more productively, and claims get settled sooner. 4. Customize claims edits to your specifications One way to drive up medical coding accuracy is to use customized claims edits. Some claims management software solutions only apply updates using universal claim edits or using groups of edits. This doesn’t work for large medical groups that need to cover multiple combinations of payer, specialty and geographical edits. Since no two payer policies are the same, claims edits would need to be checked manually to make sure nothing has been missed. Experian Health’s claims management software solves this by incorporating government and commercial edits alongside client-specific customized edits. Providers can keep pace with changes and capture the requirements of all reimbursement policies that are relevant to a particular claim. For example, ClaimSource runs front-end claims editing to coordinate federal, state and commercial payer edits together with customized provider edits to avoid coding errors. Similarly, ClaimScrubber automatically reviews and adjusts claims, helping medical groups streamline claims submissions. 5. Upgrade record-keeping technology to maintain medical billing and coding accuracy If patient records are peppered with typos and outdated contact information, then it’s highly likely that errors will be inherited on claims forms. A fifth of patients have spotted errors in their health records, including incorrect details about diagnoses, medications and test results. Preventing these errors is key to maintaining medical billing and coding accuracy. Interoperable electronic patient records protect against inaccuracies by creating a single, complete record for each patient. With a tool such as Universal Identity Manager, patient data is matched against multiple data sources to verify that the record is complete and accurate. Staff can have confidence that all information held on a patient will be taken into account when their medical encounters are coded, and avoid coding discrepancies that can occur when a patient’s treatment doesn’t seem to match their diagnosis. 6. Double-check claims before submitting  Running a line-by-line review of each claim before it’s submitted means errors can be found and fixed before they result in financial losses. This would be a painstaking task to do by hand, but with tools such as ClaimSource and ClaimScrubber, hospitals and medical groups can audit claims automatically to check for coding discrepancies or missing patient information. A streamlined claims cycle benefits payers and patients too. Payers can adjudicate accurately coded claims more quickly without pushing them into a queue for manual review, and patients get earlier clarity about how much they’ll owe. 7. Audit the claims management process to spot medical coding inaccuracies Finally, it makes sense to undertake regular audits of the medical coding and billing procedures to weed out any recurring issues. While a coding audit will focus on coding accuracy and compliance, a billing audit can investigate the systems and processes involved in everything from patient eligibility verification to patient collections. This helps uncover recurring issues with under- and over-coding, use of redundant and retired codes, non-compliance and poor documentation. Again, maintaining robust, quality data and records will make this process easier. Partnering with a single, trusted vendor to deliver an end-to-end claims management solution can help achieve this. Find out more about how Experian Health’s automated claims management solutions can help healthcare organizations maintain medical billing and coding accuracy, drive down denials and create a more predictable revenue cycle.

Automated claims processing could solve one of the biggest challenges currently facing healthcare providers: maximizing reimbursements by minimizing denied claims. Denials have been steadily increasing over the last few years. An MGMA Stat survey found that nearly seven in ten providers witnessed a jump in denials during 2021, although the trend took hold even before COVID-19 hit. If providers rely on outdated systems and tools to process the growing volume of claims, it's inevitable that denial rates will continue to climb. It's not surprising then that a new Experian Health survey revealed almost 3 in 4 providers stated that reducing claim denials takes precedence over other priorities. Getting claims right the first time is no easy task. Traditionally, the claims management process has been labor and time intensive. Claims teams spend hundreds of hours gathering documentation, preparing claims for submission, engaging with medical clearinghouses, and then monitoring claims adjudication while they await the payer's verdict. Should a claim be denied, more staff hours may be required to rework it for a second attempt at reimbursement. Even if administrative budgets and staffing numbers increased in line with demand, inefficient manual systems can no longer bear the burden of data to be managed. With more providers heading into the danger zone of claim denials, automated claims processing tools are growing in popularity. These enable more efficient claims management, boosting productivity, easing pressure on staff, and above all, minimizing denials. Experian Health's survey found that 78% of providers are open to replacing current technologies if they are presented with compelling ROI projections, reflecting the urgency of the situation. What is automated claims processing? Automating claims involves the use of digital technology, software, machine learning and advanced analytics to optimize healthcare claims management. This can include: pre-filling data into digital forms to avoid data input errors using intelligent document processing to pull unstructured information into a single, usable format comparing data from multiple sources and flagging inconsistencies providing real-time insights and status updates allowing multiple parties to work from interoperable data Tools such as robotic process automation (RPA) can be used to replace manual activities, using data, logic and business rules to make decisions within certain parameters. This eases pressure on busy staff and improves efficiency, for example, when prioritizing claims to be reworked. Imagine how much faster a software program can synthesize hundreds of current and historical data points, compared to a human trying to do the same job. There are opportunities to automate just about every stage of the claim lifecycle, from the patient's first interaction with their provider to reimbursement. For example, automation can be used to: Streamline patient onboarding and automate identity checks to avoid errors in patient information Verify insurance eligibility and run continuous coverage checks to see if the patient's status has changed Maintain a complete electronic health record that follows the patient throughout their healthcare journey, so claims contain correct information Track payer policy changes and apply custom edits so that coding information is correct Scrub claims to find and fix any errors before they are submitted Submit claims to payers and monitor the claims adjudication process Optimize the denials management workflow and prioritize denied claims for resubmission Verify reimbursements and initiate patient billing processes. Virtually any repetitive, process-driven, or paper-based task from claim creation to claim reimbursement is an opportunity for automation. As technology advances, so do the opportunities to streamline operations, reduce time to reimbursement, optimize decision-making, reduce costs and improve the patient experience. Here are the 5 benefits of automated claims processing: 1. Automated claims processing streamlines operations Automation's number one benefit is allowing providers to move away from inefficient and error-prone manual processes. Staff no longer need to sift through disparate and complex coding lists, medical records and payer edits looking for the correct information to attach to a claim. Together with electronic records management, automation allows for standardized workflows, so the entire claims cycle is more consistent, and decisions are based on real-time accurate data. It helps to eliminate time spent searching for missing information, reformatting data to meet payer requirements, and trying to figure out which claims are worth reworking. Multiple digital tools are available to optimize different tasks within the claims processing workflow. But for maximum efficiency, providers should look for solutions that work together within an integrated system. Using a single vendor makes it easier to manage data consistently and simplifies system-to-system interactions. A comprehensive claims management solution also creates a smoother user experience, for example, by allowing staff to check real-time insights within one dashboard, using one log-in. Experian Health's suite of healthcare claims management solutions connects each step in the claims workflow to speed up claims processing. For example, ClaimSource manages the entire claim cycle in a single, scalable online application that serves individual hospitals and physician practices through to large multi-facility health systems. It creates custom work queues and integrates electronic remittance data directly, to allow staff to prioritize high-impact claims and speed up reimbursement. 2. It saves staff time and resources Outdated and clumsy processes can contribute to staff burnout, poor performance and difficulties attracting and retaining top talent, even more so as patient volumes return to pre-pandemic levels. By removing many time-wasting manual tasks, automated claims processing allows staff to use their time more productively. It's particularly important amidst ongoing staffing shortages, which put additional strain on existing staff. Some of the most time-consuming manual activities occur in the prior authorization workflow. Prior authorizations are also a common cause of claim denials. Because payer requirements around prior authorizations change frequently, staff must painstakingly check each payer's website before submitting authorization requests to ensure that the necessary documentation is in place. Once submitted, they must log in to different payer portals to track progress. According to the American Medical Association, some physician practices spend more than two full days processing prior authorizations each week. But with automated prior authorizations, staff can prevent delays and denials. Online prior authorizations automate inquiries and submissions without the need for user intervention, instead drawing on payer data that are already updated and stored in the system. It auto-fills the necessary information and flags where manual intervention is required. It can initiate more authorizations in less time, and guide staff to the highest-priority tasks using dynamic, exception-based work queues. By reducing the error rate, automation also facilitates faster claims processing, which means payments can be processed and issued more quickly. 3. Automation generates more accurate and actionable insights Automation doesn't just save time; it also gives staff greater clarity and control over the claims process. Automated digital solutions facilitate more reliable data management to reduce errors, and generate real-time insights based on accurate information. A large proportion of claims are denied because patient information doesn't match the payer's records. This can be easily avoided using robust electronic medical records that hold data in standardized formats and automatically populate forms with the correct information. Electronic data management also gives staff richer and more reliable insights, by pulling together all the information they need into a single, accessible interface. Using an automated tracker such as Denial Workflow Manager makes it easy for staff to monitor claims, denials and remittances in one place. Not only does it track denials, holds, suspends, zero pays and appeals, but it also provides detailed analysis to help root out the causes of denials, so they can be avoided in the future. Staff can immediately see which claims need attention and resolve them much more quickly, as opposed to using manual processes. Enhanced Claim Status complements Denial Workflow Manager by automatically generating work lists for staff, complete with actionable data to help them check off the tasks quickly and accurately. The software sends automated status requests based on each payer's claims adjudication timeline, to see if claims are pending, denied, returned-to-provider or zero-pay transactions. This takes place before the Electronic Remittance Advice and Explanation of Benefits are processed, so staff can respond quickly and avoid unnecessary denials or delays. 4. Faster claims processing equals faster payment According to the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH), the time saved by switching from manual to electronic claims processing could save the medical industry up to $1.7 billion each year. The increase in accuracy leads to more first-time pass-through rates and optimized decision-making around which claims to rework. While automation requires some upfront investment, the output tips the balance in favor of faster, higher reimbursements. Experian Health's Claim Scrubber solution is one example of how automated claims processing can reduce undercharges and denials, optimize staff time and improve cash flow. This program reviews each pre-billed claim, line-by-line, to check that coding details are accurate. It then applies general and payer-specific edits and verifies that the claim is free of errors before it's submitted to the payer or clearinghouse. As a result, more claims are correct – and therefore paid – the first time, and staff can spend less time chasing old accounts receivable. Case study: Read how Summit Medical Group Oregon – Bend Memorial Clinic reduced A/R days and volume by 15%, and achieved a 92% clean claims rate with Claim Scrubber and Enhanced Claim Status. 5. Automation can transform the patient experience Getting claims right the first time starts at the beginning of the patient journey. A digital patient access experience is more convenient and satisfying for patients and helps prevent errors that can lead to denied claims later. Patient contact information can be automatically pre-filled so the patient can check for errors. If a patient adds new data when they're scheduling or registering for care, that information can be automatically checked against the data already on file, and flagged if there are inconsistencies. Further along, the efficiencies afforded by claim process automation mean patients don't have to wait so long for confirmation that their medical expenses have been handled. Or, if they have an out-of-pocket amount to pay, they'll get clarity about their financial responsibility much sooner. Patient portals are a great tool for helping patients track claims when and where it suits them, rather than having to wait to speak to a call center agent. And by making the claims process more efficient, automation also releases staff from time-consuming repetitive administrative tasks so they're free to support patients with more complex queries. Automation can elevate the customer experience with personalized communications and simplified transactions, from patient access to patient payments. Transitioning to automated claims management As the volume and complexity of claims to be processed increases, providers need to find ways to manage the workload, alleviate pressure on staff and prevent unnecessary revenue leakage. Working with a trusted vendor can ease the transition to automation and maximize potential cost savings. Experian Health provides industry-leading software solutions to improve healthcare claims and denials management so that more claims are clean the first time. In fact, Experian Health was voted as the top claims vendor for hospitals in the 2022 Black Book vendor survey, for the second year in a row. Find out more about how Experian Health's suite of healthcare claims management products can help providers reduce denials, rebilling and drive up reimbursements with automated, clean and data-driven claims processing.

The repercussions of errors on the healthcare claims processing workflow can be major and wide-ranging. It slows the revenue cycle, interrupts cash flow, consumes staff hours, creates frustration for staff and patients, and, in the worst cases, sacrifices revenue. Errors are a perennial—maybe even inevitable—problem but understanding some common reasons behind these mistakes can help. Additionally, digital claims management tools can help you automate claims processing to reduce claims errors, submit cleaner claims, and get paid successfully. In June 2022, Experian Health surveyed 200 revenue cycle decision-makers to understand the current state of claims management. Watch the video to see the results: Any number of claim errors can lead to denials: incorrect medical coding, missing prior authorizations, clearinghouse issues and more. Here are 7 of the most common reasons for claim errors: 1. Claim errors can be caused by missing and inaccurate data “The number one denial issue most providers encounter is eligibility,” says Rob Stucker, Senior Vice President at Experian Health. “These issues begin upstream from the claims process during registration or pre-registration when the patient information that’s collected is either inaccurate or incomplete. It may be as simple as a patient giving their name as Rob instead of Robert, or the registration staff selecting Medicaid as the payer, instead of Medicaid Managed Care. If the eligibility information is even slightly off, the claim will come back as denied.” Collecting accurate demographic and insurance information up-front using digital patient intake tools opens the digital front door and can help eliminate errors during the healthcare claims management process. 2. Manual processes and disparate systems Wherever claims processes are not automated, human error and delays can set in. In addition to typical random glitches and mistakes, many healthcare providers struggle with disparate systems from multiple vendors, in which the front-end and back-end do not communicate seamlessly. Using a single vendor with solutions that manage the entire claims processing cycle can provide holistic help. ClaimSource manages eligibility validation by repurposing Experian eligibility transactions that providers have already run at registration and editing them against the claim.  This process allows providers to double-check the eligibility of the claim before it gets submitted, at no additional cost. In addition, it also does extensive claim editing, submissions, reconciliations, and reporting. This solution creates prioritized workflows and provides access to a national library of documented government and commercial payer edits, as well as custom edits, to meet individual provider needs. 3. Changes in payer requirements can cause claims errors “Providers tell us that a major pain point is constantly changing payer rules,” says Stucker. “Providers are confident that their claims are good, but the payers’ adjudication rules may have changed without prior notice.” The problem here is exponential: voluminous changes multiplied by a range of communication channels (or faulty communication) multiplied again by a proliferation of payers and policies. Keeping pace with these changes is difficult without partner support. “We continuously monitor hundreds of thousands of payer website pages each night for updates,” says Stucker. “When a change is flagged, an analyst looks at it and decides whether it should be added as an edit. We update our huge global library of edits on a weekly or even daily basis. These edits enable ClaimSource and our pre-837 editor, Claim Scrubber to automatically review claims for errors using the most recent payer updates. 4. Prior authorizations Pre-authorizations present challenges at many levels. 8 in 10 providers saw prior authorization requirements increase during 2021. Providers must track changing requirements, obtain authorizations prior to treatment or claims submission, and complete claims that meet complex requirements. When prior authorization requirements aren’t met, appealing a denial can be complicated at best, and many times prove to be irreversible. According to Medical Group Management Association data, a simple denial takes a seasoned biller two to eight minutes to work, but a complicated denial involving prior authorization requirements can take up to an hour to work, largely thanks to time spent on hold. Ensuring claims are completed as required in the first place using a pre-authorization tool, in combination with a claims editor that validates against pre-authorizations, saves valuable time and stress. 5. Short staffing and new trainees Staff hours and expertise are both in short supply, as many providers struggle to retain experienced staff and bring new hires up to speed. Having an automated process with built-in review and analytics can help ensure that claims are completed accurately and quickly. A Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare study found automated claims take 25% less time to process than manual claims, boosting productivity and freeing staff up for the more human-intensive aspects of their work. However, the key is “accurate and user-friendly” automation. A claims vendor should be keeping edits up to date, submitting claims timely and accurately to the correct payer, keep organizations informed on the claim’s status throughout the adjudication process, retrieve electronic remit files, link them to the correct claims, and establish a denial workflow to automatically show denials. This should all be done in an extremely easy to use user interface or directly back into Patient Accounting/Practice Management Systems. If vendors aren’t doing this, then staff will just be working harder instead of smarter. 6. Slow response and follow-through can lead to claim errors  Although delays themselves don’t necessarily cause errors, they can make resolution difficult and time-consuming. Time is always an issue for providers as claims must be submitted in specific time frames from the date of service. Therefore, getting the claim created, processed through a claims vendor and submitted to the correct payer must be done efficiently, or timely filing deadlines are missed.  The same is true for identifying and re-working denials. Denial backlogs quickly become overwhelming, increasing the odds of items slipping through the cracks or re-submission/appeal deadlines being missed. Automating status updates with enhanced claim status monitoring can relieve time-strapped staff of having to contact payers manually for the latest information on claims to find out which ones are being paid or denied. Enhanced Claim Status submits automatic status requests based on each payer’s adjudication timeline from the date of claim submission, returning the payer’s proprietary responses weeks before the Electronic Remittance Advice or Explanation of Benefits are processed. This gives staff a huge head start on working denials. 7. Difficulty managing denials When errors cause claims to be denied, a response is critical. A denials workflow management solution can optimize follow-up by identifying claim denials, holds, suspensions, zero-pays, and prioritizing denials that need the fastest attention. Denial Workflow Manager also allows organizations to track root causes, which in turn can identify operational changes that can be made upstream, and reduce the denials from happening to being with. Automation is the future of effective claims management Claims management is becoming more complex and demanding, but the digital tools that automate and improve processes can help providers rise to the occasion. It’s now possible to capture and use accurate data, integrate systems and processes to work together, stay up to date on payer requirements, track claim status, and even manage denials efficiently with the help of technology. Learn more about other solutions that can help healthcare organizations with claims management.

The payer policy rollercoaster has taken a few twists and turns recently, leaving healthcare organizations out of the loop if they try to keep pace with payer requirements using manual systems alone. Keeping track of changing payer requirements has long been a major challenge for providers, but several shifts in the reimbursement landscape have prompted payers to implement updates at rates providers may struggle to match. More flexible policies permitted during the pandemic are being rolled back, altered employment patterns are influencing insurance plan administration, and new clinical delivery models (such as telehealth) are necessitating different coding structures. Healthcare providers that fail to keep up with these changes could end up wasting many hours and resources to rework claims. Instead, they should consider using automated payer alerts to ease the administrative burden, keep a lid on denial rates and protect profits. Automated payer alerts give providers the power of knowledge For many providers, staying on top of payer requirements involves recurring calendar reminders to check payer websites, subscribing to payer newsletters or social media accounts, or poring over industry media coverage for a hint at possible changes to come. If these checks were automated, providers could save hours of valuable staff time, and feel confident that no vital details are missed. With automated Payer Alerts, providers get instant access to the payer policy and procedure changes they’re too busy to catch. It’s a simple and convenient way to monitor modifications so claims can be submitted correctly the first time. This means staff can spend less time researching changes to procedures. Through an online portal and daily email digest, providers get timely alerts about payer changes posted on more than 120,000 different web pages. Every notification is the result of extensive behind-the-scenes work by Experian Health’s proprietary software. The program generates alerts with a detailed summary of changes, a link to the affected policy and a breakdown of changes by healthcare specialty. This allows providers to prioritize those that are most relevant to their organization. Client success story: Payer Alerts pay big dividends Being in the loop about what’s covered and what’s not puts providers in a better position to protect revenue by enabling more efficient allocation of resources, minimizing claim denials and avoiding missed revenue opportunities. New York-based University Physicians Network (UPN) implemented Payer Alerts to help physicians avoid denied claims. The CEO said, “Payers are increasing their edits, but if you know about them ahead of time and can make the required adjustments, you can avoid both denials and time-consuming appeals. With Experian Health, we now have an automated, straightforward process that helps us minimize unnecessary denials and take a proactive approach.” One UPN group recovered $42,000 as a result of a Payer Alert on a single policy change. Amplify results with the right healthcare payer solutions Payer Alerts helps healthcare organizations streamline their workflow and maximize revenue through more than just its immediate features. Its compatibility with other automated healthcare payer solutions can build the perfect defense against payer reimbursement challenges. For example, combining Payer Alerts with Contract Manager and Contract Analysis helps hospitals manage multiple payer contracts and checks that the correct amount has been reimbursed. Contract Manager allows providers to monitor payer performance and arms them with the data to negotiate more favorable contracts. It generates reports that support better communication with payers. This results in fewer phone calls to resolve issues and reduces the likelihood of misunderstandings over patient insurance status or whether a claim was received. Similarly, Claim Scrubber works alongside Payer Alerts to review every claim and verify that it’s coded correctly before being sent to the payer, to reduce the risk of denials. Claim Scrubber also now includes billing modifiers designed to support compliance with the Appropriate Use Criteria program. Using Payer Alerts to keep pace with regulatory changes Looking ahead, providers must continue to pay attention to legislative changes that affect payer strategies. Implementation of the No Surprises Act and related legislation should lead to greater transparency and more effective data sharing within the healthcare community. However, it also puts pressure on payer-provider relationships. Payer rules may continue to change, which means that payers may interpret these rules differently. Experian Health’s regulatory solutions can help providers stay on top of these changes and avoid penalties. Ultimately, providers can’t respond to changing payer policies if they don’t know those changes have been made. While change is inevitable, losing valuable time and revenue to inefficient manual processes is not. By investing in automated healthcare payer solutions, providers can adapt to change and stay ahead of the game. Find out more about how Experian Health’s Payer Alerts can help healthcare organizations capture the necessary information to make timely and strategic decisions to protect profits.

Navigating an increasingly complex reimbursement landscape remains challenging for today’s healthcare providers, with too many claims still underpaid, delayed or outright denied. In fact, nearly 70% of providers said the problem of denied claims had worsened during 2021. Naturally, relationships with payers suffer, adding friction to the process. To this end, revenue cycle leaders are relying on claims management software to create more visibility into complex contract and claims management processes. These data tools can resolve or prevent the snags that often interfere with claims processing and billing workflows, which allow providers to streamline claims processing, improve communication with payers and accelerate a patient’s payment lifecycle. The path through that bureaucratic jungle requires high-quality information at every step. Accurate patient data, error-free clinical documentation, up-to-the-minute payer policy updates, and verified billing software and claims edits are all essential to help reduce denials and ensure faster-flowing payments.  With so many options on the market, providers should look for healthcare claims management software that provides support in four critical areas. 1. Simplified contract management Managing and understanding the tangled web of payer contracts, insurance rules and regulations can be time-consuming and overly complex. Keeping up with ever-changing reimbursement methodologies is resource-intensive for teams that are already suffering from staffing shortages. A system like Contract Manager and Contract Analysis can ease the pressure by streamlining workflows and showing revenue cycle management teams how payers are performing against agreed-upon terms. Contract Analysis seamlessly integrates with Contract Manager to provide all the data needed to make informed decisions about whether potential contract terms are in line with business goals – before any commitments are made. 2. Claims management software should help with error-free claims submissions In a perfect world, all claims would be completely accurate every time. But errors inevitably do creep in, leading to confusion, delays, and non-payments. Healthcare providers lose massive sums of money each year due to inaccurate claim submissions, denials, corrections, and rebilling. A good claims management strategy ensures that claims are error-free before they’re submitted. Claim Scrubber is an automated solution that reviews every line of each pre-claim and verifies that it is coded with the correct information before being sent to your claim’s clearinghouse. The result? Fewer undercharges and denials, optimized staff time and better cash flow. 3. Visibility of submitted claims With multiple steps, stakeholders, and milestones, keeping track of what’s happening with a claim can be cumbersome. Regardless of the workplace setting – individual hospital, large physician practice or a multi-facility Centralized Business Office – revenue cycle leaders need streamlined workflows, custom provider and payer edits, and superb customer support. ClaimSource is a solution that ensures all hospital and physician claims are clean before submission to government or commercial payers and creates custom workflows for easy prioritization and organization. With ClaimSource, providers can manage the entire claims cycle, from eligibility validation, claims editing, claims submission to the payers, claim submission reconciliation, remit retrieval, and reporting, in a single online application. 4. Claims management software should help prevent claims denials Denial rates vary widely between issuers. One 2020 study of HealthCare.gov issuers found that 1% to 57% of in-network claims were denied, while over 70% of major medical issuers had a claims denial rate of over 10%. Many reported denying one-third or more of all in-network claims. A tool such as Enhanced Claim Status makes it easy to respond early and accurately to denied, zero-pay, pending or returned-to-provider transactions before the Electronic Remittance Advice (ERA) and Explanation of Benefits (EOB) get processed. By removing the need for manual follow-up tasks and automatically submitting status updates based on each payer’s adjudication timeframe, providers can improve productivity and get paid the correct amounts faster. The claims management process is fraught with challenges. But with the right tools, data and analytics, these hurdles can be overcome. By integrating pre-claim (encounters) and post-claim (837) claims management software into the revenue cycle workflow, it's easy to review every line of every encounter. In this way, providers can verify that each claim is coded properly and contains the correct information before the claim is invoiced and submitted for reimbursement. Simply getting paid may not yet be as easy as providers would prefer, but technologies like Contract Manager and Contract Analysis, with their reliable customer support, can certainly oil the wheels. Find out more about how Experian Health’s Claims Management solutions with global payer edits and custom provider edits can help providers streamline the payment process and improve efficiencies, simplify the process and ensure speedy and accurate reimbursements.

The Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) program is due to come into full effect in January 2023 at the earliest. The program was established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to help providers order the most appropriate diagnostic imaging services. Failure to comply may result in claims denials. Any provider that offers these services to Medicare beneficiaries should amend their clinical and revenue cycle workflows now, to avoid payment penalties when the AUC testing period comes to an end. This article sets out what providers can do to learn, test and prepare for the AUC program, and what Experian Health is doing to help healthcare providers manage these changes and minimize the risk of denied claims. What is the Appropriate Use Criteria program? The AUC program was created through the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 to help ensure that diagnostic imaging services would only be provided where medically necessary. No one would argue against evidence-based care. However, accessing that evidence can be challenging. Easy-access online tools are intended to make this easier. They have also been shown to reduce the overutilization of high-risk, high-cost imaging services. Under the program, any time a physician (or a member of their clinical staff) wants to order imaging services such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) for certain Medicare patients, they’ll need to consult an electronic Clinical Decision Support Mechanism (CDSM). This is especially important in an academic teaching environment. This online portal will check the patient’s electronic health record (EHR) and determine whether the order adheres to AUC or not, or whether the AUC consulted was not applicable. After consulting the CDSM, the ordering physician will need to include the following data on the order they send to the imaging services provider: the CDSM they consulted the ordering provider’s National Provider Identifier whether the service adhered to the applicable AUC or not, or whether no criteria in the CDSM were applicable to the patient’s clinical situation. Any ordering professionals deemed to be outliers will be required to seek prior authorization. When the program is fully implemented, imaging service providers will need to ensure they have a certificate of compliance to secure reimbursement. Who will be affected by the AUC program? The program applies to any provider that orders advanced diagnostic imaging services that are delivered in physician’s offices, hospital outpatient departments, ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) or independent diagnostic testing facilities. It applies to those that are paid under the Medicare physician fee schedule, hospital outpatient prospective payment system or ASC payment system. It does not apply to Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Emergencies, inpatient services and certain hardship exceptions are exempt. If any of these exceptions apply, the ordering physician must record them on the claim using the appropriate modifier code. When do providers need to implement it? CMS confirmed that there will be no payment consequences for failing to include AUC data until the later of January 2023 or the declared end of the COVID-19 public health emergency. In the meantime, providers are encouraged to implement the program on a voluntary basis, which will help identify pinch points in the claims management workflow. Claims submitted before full implementation may still be subject to denial, so it’s worth getting the process right now to avoid unnecessary rework later. How can providers “learn, test and prepare” for the AUC program? Healthcare organizations that may be affected by the AUC mandate should consider the following actions to ensure they are fully prepared by the time the program is fully implemented: Check the AUC program requirements and identify which service lines and vendors will be affected. Choose an appropriate Medicare-approved CDSM that closely matches existing EHR and claims management processes. Most EHR vendors will recommend a CDSM that fits seamlessly with their solution. CMS has also provided a list of certified CDSMs, which includes free options. However, these operate as stand-alone systems that will be more challenging to integrate with existing workflows. Communicate changes to staff. Ensure all referring and rendering providers are aware of and trained on the requirements and encourage dialogue to clarify new ways of working. Consider the impact on claims management teams, and ensure staff are trained on the new requirements. Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System G-codes and modifiers must be reported in claims alongside primary and secondary diagnosis and procedure codes. Are staff aware of the new codes? Are additional staff needed to process claims and potential rework that may be required after the AUC program is implemented? Build in time for review, to check that new processes are compliant. Ideally, the CDSM solution will include reporting functions to monitor progress and identify potential outliers that may be subject to prior authorizations later. If the furnishing provider is different from the ordering provider, the furnishing provider should have a workflow to confirm AUC adherence. How can digital tools and automation help providers ensure compliance with Appropriate Use Criteria? While the goal of the AUC program is to improve patient care and help manage the cost to the public purse, there will be an administrative burden for staff. The growing volume and complexity of claims overrule any attempt to manage this manually. Instead, healthcare organizations should look at automating the compliance process to ensure accuracy, prevent denied claims and reduce staff costs. To help healthcare providers manage these changes, Experian Health enhanced the Medical Necessity application to generate informational alerts when a procedure needs to adhere to AUC or prior authorization for Medicare patients. Users will be able to use this alert as a sign to check the AUC has been adhered to. These tools also fit well with Claim Scrubber, which reviews every line of each claim to verify that it’s coded correctly and isn’t missing any vital information, before being submitted. Claim Scrubber has also been enhanced to incorporate billing modifiers that will help with overall compliance requirements under the AUC rules. Preparing for what’s to come Access to medically necessary services is at the heart of evidence-based care. However, in promoting this, the Appropriate Use Criteria program creates additional tasks for staff that need to be understood and managed efficiently. While there are currently no penalties for non-compliance, providers should use the testing period to proactively implement new processes to determine their efficacy. As healthcare regulation continues to evolve, healthcare organizations should take a holistic approach to the exchange of information between clinical decision-makers, service providers and payers to lay the groundwork for consistent, accurate and reliable claims. Find out more about how Experian Health’s Medical Necessity and Claim Scrubber solutions support the claims management process and help healthcare organizations adhere to the Appropriate Use Criteria program.

Claims denials are a major source of headaches for healthcare organizations. On average, denied claims can take more than two weeks longer to pay out than first-time claims, if they get paid at all. Denials can have major downstream impacts, including lower annual net revenue, additional hours spent on administrative work, and potential disruptions to patient care. Claims denials aren’t just an occasional inconvenience, either. A recent American Hospital Association (AHA) survey found that 89% of all hospitals and health systems have seen a rise in denials over the past three years, with half of the participants describing the increase as “significant.” Data from Healthcare.gov confirms this trend. The Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) states that in 2019, health plans available on the individual market denied an average of 17% of all claims – up from 14% the year before. It’s becoming more critical than ever for healthcare organizations to employ integrated, intuitive, and technology-driven strategies to get their claims paid in a timely and efficient manner. Reduce claim denials by eliminating administrative errors and manual processes Health plans can deny claims for any number of reasons. The good news is that in 2019, KFF found that less than 1% of claims were denied based on medical necessity. The bad news is that the remaining 99% were denied largely due to other reasons. This included referrals, prior authorizations, coverage disputes, data errors, and clearinghouse problems. Many claims denial issues occur when organizations rely on manual processing of complex documents that are subject to ever-changing requirements from a wide variety of payers. Mistakes are not uncommon, and that ends up costing time and money. Smart, intuitive claims management workflows that take advantage of automation technology can augment staff resources and reduce the likelihood of errors. Automation contributes to clean and accurate claims the first time around. According to the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH), manual processing can take an average of four minutes per claim. Automation cuts this time by 25%, bringing the total time per claim down to just three minutes. This might not seem like a lot in isolation; however, it becomes more material when the time savings is applied to a large, multi-hospital health system that partnered with Experian Health to revamp its claims processes. The health system gets through 200,000 claims per month. That could translate into 200,000 minutes saved – or more than 3,300 hours – every 30 days. Amidst the staffing shortages that are persistent in healthcare, those numbers are significant. For providers of all sizes, the right automation tools use an expansive library of national payer edits, supplemented by custom edits, to ensure that claims are clean before they get out the door. These tools can also organize and prioritize accounts to help staff members use their time most efficiently. If a claim does have an issue, organizations can use additional technologies to stay one step ahead of the denials process. Enhanced claim status monitoring can give providers insight into potential problems long before the ERA and Explanation of Benefits are processed. This allows organizations to address known issues and predict their revenue cycle outcomes earlier and more accurately. Automation can also help providers slash even more time off the claims management process. The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) estimates that it takes between 14 and 30 minutes to complete a manual claims status inquiry. Automated status monitoring can potentially shave 9 minutes off this task, freeing up staff to complete other tasks. There’s still plenty of options when claims do get denied. Providers can complement their claims capabilities with denials workflow management tools that can generate customized worklists, highlight ANSI reason codes and payer proprietary codes, and identify payer-specific denial trends to help inform decision-making. Automation creates a faster, more accurate claims processing ecosystem Most healthcare organizations use a number of different technologies to manage their revenue cycles, and all these systems must work together in harmony. Unfortunately, interoperability across disparate clinical and financial systems isn’t easy to achieve. In the case of the provider that chose Experian Health to improve its claims process, integration with Epic, its medical records system of choice, was very important. For example, ClaimSource easily loaded customized edits and the edits library into Epic, tracked and corrected claims, and found and repaired issues with the system build, creating opportunities for cross-training and centralized reporting. Thanks to this automated, integrated process, this provider improved its acceptance rate by 10 percent, consistently seeing 99 percent of its claims accepted. Additionally, its clean, paid claims percentage increased by over 10 percent, creating a more predictable, profitable revenue cycle. With denials on the rise in an increasingly challenging claims management environment, providers will benefit from replacing manual processes wherever possible.  Automation is the key to optimizing staff resources and significantly reducing reimbursement obstacles. To see sustained success with your revenue cycle, get in touch with Experian Health and start automating your claims process today.

In the sixth article in our series on how the patient journey has evolved since the onset of COVID-19, we look at three ways to prevent claim denials and reduce the time to payment. Faster claims processing is at the heart of a better patient financial experience and reduces revenue leakage for providers. For more insights and strategic recommendations to improve the patient journey in 2021 and beyond, download the full white paper. Nearly seven in 10 healthcare leaders say claim denials have increased in 2021, with an average denial rate of 17%. Inefficient claims processing and claims management systems were already struggling, but the pressures of the pandemic are causing even more rejections. Vaccination programs, rescheduled electives, and residency relocations contributed to fluctuating patient volumes, putting extra strain on reimbursement workflows. Patients switching health plans, and missing codes for COVID-19 vaccinations and treatment caused further delays and errors. Payer rules for reimbursement of treatment for “Long Covid” remain unclear: the absence of research and standards means claims are rejected because there’s no agreed “medical necessity.” Slow processes, incorrect patient identities, and poor data management mean the upward trend in claim denials seen over the last five years shows that it is likely to continue. Denials create a fragmented experience for patients because they don’t know how much they’ll need to pay for care, and leaves providers battling to recoup revenue. An effective claims management system is critical for maintaining provider revenue, securing patient reimbursements, and promoting positive patient-provider relationships. Here, we recommend a three-part strategy that uses data and automation to get claims right the first time. Prevention is better than cure One of the primary frustrations for claims management teams is that the majority of denied claims are preventable. Many of the errors that trigger denials could be avoided if databases and records systems could talk to each other. Instead of a reactive response, providers should invest in tools that can proactively prevent mistakes and errors, to ensure they collect every dollar owed. Digital tools can analyze data to help providers weed out the vulnerabilities in their processes and keep up with payer changes. Incorporating such tools is a sensible first step toward reducing and recovering expenses. One option is ClaimSource, which helps ensure that all hospital and physician claims are clean before being submitted to a government or commercial payer. It unlocks access to extensive federal, state, and commercial payer edits, allows custom provider edits, and incorporates automation tools and customer support. Providers can become confident that their claims will be correct the first time. Improving the likelihood of approval is critical to provider profitability and makes for a smoother patient experience. Prioritize eligibility checks for cleaner claims the first time Experian Health’s revenue cycle management experts say that the number one reason for denials is inaccurate eligibility. A 2020 poll by the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) backs this up: 42% of providers said inaccurate or incomplete prior authorizations were a top cause of denials. Most providers use a medical claims clearinghouse or have systems to check eligibility beforehand. However, if patient identities aren’t verified properly at every touchpoint in the healthcare journey, mistakes can creep in and cause confusion about eligibility. Similarly, if the patient needs additional treatment that isn’t covered in the initial authorization, the resulting mismatch could lead to a denial. Tools such as Prior Authorizations and Insurance Eligibility Verification can help providers validate patient coverage in under 30 seconds. These solutions integrate with ClaimSource to fill in the gaps of patient information and streamline the claims process. Patients will get better insights into what they owe, and providers can increase efficiency. Automate workflows to eliminate time-consuming errors with claims processing Providers are well aware that manual processing slows reimbursement and increases the risk of errors. Tools such as Prior Authorizations and Insurance Eligibility Verification can help by using data and automation to improve accuracy and efficiency. The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare suggests that automation can shave 20% off claims processing times, which could translate to thousands of hours saved each month. With those extra hours, claims teams will be freed up to complete their lengthy to-do lists and focus their efforts on other priorities. In addition, automated workflows can help assign work to the right specialist, keep track of payer changes, and incorporate repeated identity verification checks to drive down denials. With a Denial Workflow Manager, providers can automate and optimize their entire denial management process to get real-time insights on denied claims. This system can eliminate manual reviews and quickly identify accounts for resubmission or appeal. It can be integrated with tools such as ClaimSource and Enhanced Claim Status, so providers can monitor claims, denials and remits on the same screen and accelerate the workflow. As the pandemic continues to pressure profits and patients come to expect more from their healthcare journey, it’s no longer reasonable to accept denials as a cost of doing business. To find out how Experian Health can help your organization reduce denials, recover pandemic losses, and improve the patient experience, contact our team today. Missed the other blogs in the series? Check them out: 4 data driven healthcare marketing strategies to re-engage patients after COVID-19 How 24/7 self-scheduling can improve the post-pandemic patient experience COVID-19 highlights an acute need for digital patient intake solutions Automated prior authorization: getting patients the approved care they need Getting a holistic picture of patients with social determinants of health

“Experian Health’s speed and ability to speak our business language definitely impressed us,” said ACS president, Tim Anderson. “Some of the claims were valid for only a few more weeks, and we were able to submit them in plenty of time. This is the best, fastest platform we’ve seen to reconcile duplicate and data-deficient records. It really helped us achieve the best possible resolution for our clients and our company.” Acadiana Computer Systems, Inc. (ACS) was contracted with numerous labs in Louisiana to submit billing claims, primarily to Medicare, for testing that occurred in the first months of the pandemic. Unfortunately, in the chaos and scramble to offer testing services as quickly as possible in nursing homes and testing sites, the labs struggled to collect needed information to submit valid claims – in particular the Medicare beneficiary’s MBI number, or even a Social Security number. As the pandemic response progressed, a similar challenge developed around the administration of vaccines, particularly in mass vaccination sites and other off-site vaccination centers. Providers struggled to get more than a name and maybe a birthdate, address, or phone number. This left a gap in ACS’ efforts to submit private insurance and Medicare reimbursement claims on behalf of their clients. ACS worked with Experian Health and our Universal Identity Manager (UIM) platform, delivering the Experian Single Best Record (ESBR) – the matching of records through aggregation of disparate information and delivering a single record that accurately identifies separate records that belong to one person. The platform uses multiple data sources to verify, match and consolidate disparate records into one “best record.” ACS assembled the records requiring more identifying data and prepared them for secure transfer to Experian Health. Experian Health securely accepted more than 75,000 patient records and ran them through the UIM platform in 24 hours. It was critical to assign an SSN to as many individual records as possible, and to confirm an associated MBI number for Medicare billing, if applicable. Results included: 69% assigned unique records 12% identified as duplicate records With the information delivered back from the matched records, ACS had all the necessary data needed to continue the billing process. Within a week claims were submitted, expected to exceed $20 million in collections when the process is completed. The ACS group was experienced, savvy and data ready. Their expertise enabled an elegant and efficient exchange and complemented Experian Health’s capabilities. ACS expects to continue to use Experian Health’s UIM platform throughout the pandemic and also for mitigating duplicate records and preparing claims for submission. Learn more about how our Universal Identity Manager (UIM) platform can help your organization eliminate duplicate patient records.