Loading...

Are We Suffering from Breach Notification Fatigue?

Published: May 3, 2011 by Guest Contributor

It seems as though every day the news headlines trumpet another high-profile data breach. The most recent marquee breach is courtesy of a Sony PlayStation Network hacker, whose attack on the Sony and Qriocity servers between April 17th and 19th have compromised the personal data and, possibly, stored credit card information of 77 million players. (Yes, you read that right; 77 million.) Combine that with other recent cyber-heists affecting millions of unsuspecting consumers or residents, and many organizations have been forced to send out a dizzying array of email notifications to their customer base, many – if not all – of whom are now vulnerable to spear-phishing attacks.

With numerous different breaches affecting so many people as of late, millions of consumers are receiving emails from trusted brands noting that customer emails (and perhaps other information) have been compromised, so consumers should be wary of future emails that may appear to be sent from them…like the one they’re reading now.

Got that?

This begs the question of whether customers are starting to tune out to the onslaught of breach alerts flooding their email in-boxes.

Some security gurus believe that notifications aren’t effective and customers become numb to these alerts. Others are convinced that breach information overload is a good thing, educating people to the dangers lurking in the cybershadows and their vulnerability to identity thieves. After all, how do you know to watch out for email “bait” if you’re not aware there’s a phishing hook with your name on it?

Furthermore, the flip side of over-notification is under-notification. This is something that Sony is now being accused of in a lawsuit that claims the company waited too long to notify its PlayStation customers of the recent breach, which only exacerbated customer vulnerability to credit card fraud.

The irony is that while the dramatic breaches of late have been stealing headlines (as well as data), a 2011 Data Breaches Investigations Report by Verizon indicates that total thefts from data breaches have in fact declined significantly over the past few years. The total number of records actually compromised from these breaches was a “mere” 4 million in 2010, quite a drop from the 144 million records compromised in 2009, and the 361 million compromised records in 2008. The bad news? If you look at actual data breaches versus compromised records, the numbers this year are up; 760 breaches last year, an increase from 141 in 2009.

The bottom line: while fraudsters haven’t been able to recently score as much cyber-loot as in times past, this is no time to relax. Just be aware that with the steep increase in breaches comes an equally steep increase in breach notifications, and the associated risk that breach notification fatigue will put your customers to sleep.

Related Posts

Fraud rings cause an estimated $5 trillion in financial damages every year, making them one of the most dangerous threats facing today’s businesses. They’re organized, sophisticated and only growing more powerful with the advent of Generative AI (GenAI). Armed with advanced tools and an array of tried-and-true attack strategies, fraud rings have perfected the art of flying under the radar and circumventing traditional fraud detection tools. Their ability to adapt and innovate means they can identify and exploit vulnerabilities in businesses' fraud stacks; if you don’t know how fraud rings work and the right signs to look for, you may not be able to catch a fraud ring attack until it’s too late. What is a fraud ring? A fraud ring is an organized group of cybercriminals who collaborate to execute large-scale, coordinated attacks on one or more targets. These highly sophisticated groups leverage advanced techniques and technologies to breach fraud defenses and exploit vulnerabilities. In the past, they were primarily humans working scripts at scale; but with GenAI they’re increasingly mobilizing highly sophisticated bots as part of (or the entirety of) the attack. Fraud ring attacks are rarely isolated incidents. Typically, these groups will target the same victim multiple times, leveraging insights gained from previous attack attempts to refine and enhance their strategies. This iterative approach enables them to adapt to new controls and increase their impact with each subsequent attack. The impacts of fraud ring attacks far exceed those of an individual fraudster, incurring significant financial losses, interrupting operations and compromising sensitive data. Understanding the keys to spotting fraud rings is crucial for crafting effective defenses to stop them. Uncovering fraud rings There’s no single tell-tale sign of a fraud ring. These groups are too agile and adaptive to be defined by one trait. However, all fraud rings — whether it be an identity fraud ring, coordinated scam effort, or large-scale ATO fraud scheme — share common traits that produce warning signs of imminent attacks. First and foremost, fraud rings are focused on efficiency. They work quickly, aiming to cause as much damage as possible. If the fraud ring’s goal is to open fraudulent accounts, you won’t see a fraud ring member taking their time to input stolen data on an application; instead, they’ll likely copy and paste data from a spreadsheet or rely on fraud bots to execute the task. Typically, the larger the fraud ring attack, the more complex it is. The biggest fraud rings leverage a variety of tools and strategies to keep fraud teams on their heels and bypass traditional fraud defenses. Fraud rings often test strategies before launching a full-scale attack. This can look like a small “probe” preceding a larger attack, or a mass drop-off after fraudsters have gathered the information they needed from their testing phase. Fraud ring detection with behavioral analytics Behavioral analytics in fraud detection uncovers third-party fraud, from large-scale fraud ring operations and sophisticated bot attacks to individualized scams. By analyzing user behavior, organizations can effectively detect and mitigate these threats. With behavioral analytics, businesses have a new layer of fraud ring detection that doesn’t exist elsewhere in their fraud stack. At a crowd level, behavioral analytics reveals spikes in risky behavior, including fraud ring testing probes, that may indicate a forthcoming fraud ring attack, but would typically be hidden by sheer volume or disregarded as normal traffic. Behavioral analytics also identifies the high-efficiency techniques that fraud rings use, including copy/paste or “chunking” behaviors, or the use of advanced fraud bots designed to mimic human behavior. Learn more about our behavioral analytics solutions and their fraud ring detection capabilities. Learn more

Published: February 27, 2025 by Presten Swenson

Fraud never sleeps, and neither do the experts working to stop it. That’s why we’re thrilled to introduce Meet the Maker, our new video series spotlighting the brilliant minds behind Experian’s cutting-edge fraud solutions. In our first episode, Matt Ehrlich, Senior Director of Identity and Fraud Product Management, and Andrea Nighswander, Senior Director of Global Solution Strategy, share how they use data, advanced analytics, and deep industry expertise to stay ahead of fraudsters. With 35+ years of combined experience, these fraud-fighting veterans know exactly what it takes to keep bad actors at bay. Watch now for an exclusive look at the minds shaping the future of fraud prevention.    Stay tuned for more episodes featuring the visionaries driving fraud innovation.

Published: February 21, 2025 by Julie Lee

Romance scams target individuals of all ages and backgrounds. Financial institutions need to protect their customers from these schemes.

Published: February 5, 2025 by Alex Lvoff