Apply DA Tag

Fraud rings cause an estimated $5 trillion in financial damages every year, making them one of the most dangerous threats facing today’s businesses. They’re organized, sophisticated and only growing more powerful with the advent of Generative AI (GenAI). Armed with advanced tools and an array of tried-and-true attack strategies, fraud rings have perfected the art of flying under the radar and circumventing traditional fraud detection tools. Their ability to adapt and innovate means they can identify and exploit vulnerabilities in businesses' fraud stacks; if you don’t know how fraud rings work and the right signs to look for, you may not be able to catch a fraud ring attack until it’s too late. What is a fraud ring? A fraud ring is an organized group of cybercriminals who collaborate to execute large-scale, coordinated attacks on one or more targets. These highly sophisticated groups leverage advanced techniques and technologies to breach fraud defenses and exploit vulnerabilities. In the past, they were primarily humans working scripts at scale; but with GenAI they’re increasingly mobilizing highly sophisticated bots as part of (or the entirety of) the attack. Fraud ring attacks are rarely isolated incidents. Typically, these groups will target the same victim multiple times, leveraging insights gained from previous attack attempts to refine and enhance their strategies. This iterative approach enables them to adapt to new controls and increase their impact with each subsequent attack. The impacts of fraud ring attacks far exceed those of an individual fraudster, incurring significant financial losses, interrupting operations and compromising sensitive data. Understanding the keys to spotting fraud rings is crucial for crafting effective defenses to stop them. Uncovering fraud rings There’s no single tell-tale sign of a fraud ring. These groups are too agile and adaptive to be defined by one trait. However, all fraud rings — whether it be an identity fraud ring, coordinated scam effort, or large-scale ATO fraud scheme — share common traits that produce warning signs of imminent attacks. First and foremost, fraud rings are focused on efficiency. They work quickly, aiming to cause as much damage as possible. If the fraud ring’s goal is to open fraudulent accounts, you won’t see a fraud ring member taking their time to input stolen data on an application; instead, they’ll likely copy and paste data from a spreadsheet or rely on fraud bots to execute the task. Typically, the larger the fraud ring attack, the more complex it is. The biggest fraud rings leverage a variety of tools and strategies to keep fraud teams on their heels and bypass traditional fraud defenses. Fraud rings often test strategies before launching a full-scale attack. This can look like a small “probe” preceding a larger attack, or a mass drop-off after fraudsters have gathered the information they needed from their testing phase. Fraud ring detection with behavioral analytics Behavioral analytics in fraud detection uncovers third-party fraud, from large-scale fraud ring operations and sophisticated bot attacks to individualized scams. By analyzing user behavior, organizations can effectively detect and mitigate these threats. With behavioral analytics, businesses have a new layer of fraud ring detection that doesn’t exist elsewhere in their fraud stack. At a crowd level, behavioral analytics reveals spikes in risky behavior, including fraud ring testing probes, that may indicate a forthcoming fraud ring attack, but would typically be hidden by sheer volume or disregarded as normal traffic. Behavioral analytics also identifies the high-efficiency techniques that fraud rings use, including copy/paste or “chunking” behaviors, or the use of advanced fraud bots designed to mimic human behavior. Learn more about our behavioral analytics solutions and their fraud ring detection capabilities. Learn more

Fraud never sleeps, and neither do the experts working to stop it. That’s why we’re thrilled to introduce Meet the Maker, our new video series spotlighting the brilliant minds behind Experian’s cutting-edge fraud solutions. In our first episode, Matt Ehrlich, Senior Director of Identity and Fraud Product Management, and Andrea Nighswander, Senior Director of Global Solution Strategy, share how they use data, advanced analytics, and deep industry expertise to stay ahead of fraudsters. With 35+ years of combined experience, these fraud-fighting veterans know exactly what it takes to keep bad actors at bay. Watch now for an exclusive look at the minds shaping the future of fraud prevention.    Stay tuned for more episodes featuring the visionaries driving fraud innovation.

The days of managing credit risk, fraud prevention, and compliance in silos are over. As fraud threats evolve, regulatory scrutiny increases, and economic uncertainty persists, businesses need a more unified risk strategy to stay ahead. Our latest e-book, Navigating the intersection of credit, fraud, and compliance, explores why 94% of forward-looking companies expect credit, fraud, and compliance to converge within the next three years — and what that means for your business.1 Key insights include: The line between fraud and credit risk is blurring. Many organizations classify first-party fraud losses as credit losses, distorting the true risk picture. Fear of fraud is costing businesses growth. 68% of organizations say they’re denying too many good customers due to fraud concerns. A unified approach is the future. Integrating risk decisioning across credit, fraud, and compliance leads to stronger fraud detection, smarter credit risk assessments, and improved compliance. Read the full e-book to explore how an integrated risk approach can protect your business and fuel growth. Download e-book 1Research conducted by InsightAvenue on behalf of Experian

With cybersecurity threats on the rise, organizations are turning to token-based authentication as a secure and efficient solution to safeguard sensitive data and systems. Data breaches impacted 1.1 billion individuals in 2024, a staggering 490% increase from the previous year.1 Token-based authentication is a method of verifying a user's identity through digital tokens rather than traditional means such as passwords. These tokens are temporary and serve as access keys, allowing users to securely interact with systems, applications, and networks. The goal of token authentication is to strengthen security while improving the user experience. Instead of relying solely on static credentials (like passwords), which can be intercepted or stolen, leveraging a type of multi-factor authentication like tokens adds an additional layer of security by functioning as dynamic access credentials. How token-based authentication works Token authentication unfolds through a series of steps to ensure robust security. Here's a simplified breakdown of how it works in practice: User request and authentication: When a user attempts to log in, they provide their credentials (e.g., username and password). These credentials are verified by the authentication server. Token generation: After verifying the user's credentials, the server generates a token — a cryptographically secured string often containing information like the user's ID and permissions. Token sent to the user: The generated token is sent back to the user or their device to confirm authentication. Token usage for access: Now authenticated, the user uses the token to access the system or application. The token is passed along with each request to ensure the user is authorized to proceed. Token validation: Each time a token is presented to the server, its integrity and expiration are verified. If the token is valid, access is granted; if not, the session is terminated. Token expiration and renewal: Tokens are typically temporary and expire after a set period. Users must either re-authenticate or renew the token for continued access. This limits the time window during which a stolen token can be misused. Types of token authentication methods Token authentication comes in different forms to meet various use case requirements. Common types include: JSON Web Tokens (JWT) Lightweight, self-contained, and easily transferred between clients and servers, JWT is one of the most widely used token formats. It includes claims, which are bits of information about a user encoded within the token, such as roles and permissions. Example: A financial application uses JWTs to ensure only registered users can access private account data. OAuth tokens OAuth is an industry-standard authorization protocol that uses tokens to grant limited access to applications without revealing the user's credentials. It’s often used for third-party service integration. Example: When you log into an e-commerce platform using your Google credentials, OAuth tokens authorize access. Session tokens These are temporary tokens stored on the server to track authenticated sessions, commonly used in web applications to ensure secure browsing. Example: Online banking platforms rely on session tokens for secure user sessions. Refresh tokens Refresh tokens are designed to renew access tokens without requiring the user to log in repeatedly. They extend session durations while maintaining a high-security standard. Example: A subscription service app uses refresh tokens to maintain a seamless user experience without frequent logouts. Benefits of token-based authentication Token-based authentication offers several advantages that make it a preferred security measure for organizations of all sizes. Enhanced security: Tokens reduce the risk of breaches as they are temporary and encrypted. They’re also specific to sessions, applications, or devices, meaning unauthorized users cannot reuse stolen tokens effectively. Elimination of password reliance: Tokens reduce dependence on static passwords, which are often reused and susceptible to brute-force attacks. This bolsters an organization’s overall cybersecurity posture. Improved user experience: Token authentication allows for more seamless interactions by minimizing the need for repeated logins. With features like single sign-on (SSO), users enjoy convenient access to multiple platforms with a single token. Scalability: Tokens are flexible and can adapt to varied business use cases, making them ideal for organizations of all scales. For instance, application programming interfaces (APIs) and microservices can communicate securely via token exchanges. Supports compliance: Token-based authentication helps organizations meet regulatory compliance requirements by offering robust access control and audit trails. This is critical for industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce. Cost efficiency: While implementing token-based authentication may require an initial investment, it reduces long-term risks and costs associated with data breaches, system downtime, and customer trust. How Experian can help strengthen your authentication process At Experian, we recognize that strong security measures should never compromise the user experience. That's why we offer cutting-edge identity solutions tailored to meet the needs of organizations. Our tools allow you to integrate token-based authentication seamlessly into your systems while ensuring compliance with security best practices and industry regulations. Are you ready to take your business's security and user experience to the next level? Visit us online today. Learn more 12024-2025 Data Breach Response Guide, Experian, 2024. This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.

Picture this: you’re sipping your morning coffee when an urgent email from your CEO pops up in your inbox, requesting sensitive information. Everything about it seems legit — their name, email address, even their usual tone. But here’s the twist: it’s not actually them. This is the reality of spoofing attacks. And these scenarios aren’t rare. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), spoofing/phishing is the most common type of cybercrime.¹   In these attacks, bad actors disguise their identity to trick individuals or systems into believing the communication is from a trusted source. Whether it’s email spoofing, caller ID spoofing, or Internet Protocol (IP) spoofing, the financial and reputational consequences can be severe. By understanding how these attacks work and implementing strong defenses, organizations can reduce their risk and protect sensitive information. Let’s break down the key strategies for staying one step ahead of cybercriminals. What is a spoofing attack? A spoofing attack occurs when a threat actor impersonates a trusted source to gain access to sensitive information, disrupt operations or manipulate systems. Common types of spoofing attacks include: Email spoofing: Fraudulent emails are carefully crafted to mimic legitimate senders, often including convincing details like company logos, real employee names, and professional formatting. These emails trick recipients into sharing sensitive information, such as login credentials or financial details, or prompt them to download malware disguised as attachments. For example, attackers might impersonate a trusted vendor to redirect payments or a senior executive requesting immediate access to confidential data. Caller ID spoofing: Attackers manipulate phone numbers to impersonate trusted contacts, making calls appear as if they are coming from legitimate organizations or individuals. This tactic is often used to extract sensitive information, such as account credentials, or to trick victims into making payments. For instance, a scammer might pose as a bank representative calling to warn of suspicious activity on an account, coercing the recipient into sharing private information or transferring funds. IP spoofing: IP addresses are falsified to disguise the origin of malicious traffic to bypass security measures and mask malicious activity. Cybercriminals use this method to redirect traffic, conduct man-in-the-middle attacks, where a malicious actor intercepts and possibly alters the communication between two parties without their knowledge, or overwhelm systems with distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks. For example, attackers might alter the source IP address of a data packet to appear as though it is coming from a trusted source, making it easier to infiltrate networks and compromise sensitive data. These tactics are often used in conjunction with other cyber threats, such as phishing or bot fraud, making detection and prevention more challenging. How behavioral analytics can combat spoofing attacks Traditional fraud prevention methods provide a strong foundation but behavioral analytics adds a powerful layer to fraud stacks. By examining user behavior patterns, behavioral analytics enhances existing tools to: Detect anomalies that signal a spoofing attack. Identify bot fraud attempts, where automated scripts mimic legitimate users. Enhance fraud prevention solutions with friction-free, real-time insights. Behavioral analytics is particularly effective when paired with device and network intelligence and machine learning (ML) solutions. These advanced tools can continuously adapt to new fraud tactics, ensuring robust protection against evolving threats. The role of artificial intelligence (AI) and ML in spoofing attack prevention AI fraud detection is revolutionizing how organizations protect themselves from spoofing attacks. By leveraging AI analytics and machine learning solutions, organizations can: Analyze vast amounts of data to identify spoofing patterns. Automate threat detection and response. Strengthen overall fraud prevention strategies. These technologies are essential for staying ahead of cybercriminals, particularly as they increasingly use AI to perpetrate attacks.   Best practices for preventing spoofing attacks Organizations can take proactive steps to minimize the risk of spoofing attacks. Key strategies include: Implementing robust authentication protocols: Use multifactor authentication (MFA) to verify the identity of users and systems. Monitoring network traffic: Deploy tools that can analyze traffic for signs of IP spoofing or other anomalies. Leveraging behavioral analytics: Adopt advanced fraud prevention solutions that include behavioral analytics to detect and mitigate threats. Educating employees: Provide training on recognizing phishing attempts and other spoofing tactics. Partnering with fraud prevention experts: Collaborate with trusted providers like Experian to access cutting-edge solutions tailored to your needs. Why proactive prevention matters The financial and reputational damage caused by spoofing attacks can be devastating. Organizations that fail to implement effective prevention measures risk: Losing customer trust. Facing regulatory penalties. Incurring significant financial losses. Businesses can stay ahead of cyber threats by prioritizing spoofing attack prevention and leveraging advanced technologies such as behavioral analytics, AI fraud detection, and machine learning, Investing in fraud prevention solutions today is essential for protecting your organization’s future. How we help organizations detect spoofing attacks Spoofing attacks are an ever-present danger in the digital age. With tactics like IP spoofing and bot fraud becoming more sophisticated, businesses must adopt advanced strategies to safeguard their operations. Our comprehensive suite of fraud prevention solutions can help businesses tackle spoofing attacks and other cyber threats. Our advanced technologies like behavioral analytics, AI fraud detection and machine learning solutions, enable organizations to: Identify and respond to spoofing attempts in real-time. Detect anomalies and patterns indicative of fraudulent behavior. Strengthen defenses against bot fraud and IP spoofing. Ensure compliance with industry regulations and standards. Click ‘learn more’ below to explore how we can help protect your organization. Learn more 1 https://www.ic3.gov/AnnualReport/Reports/2023_IC3Report.pdf This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information. 

In today's evolving financial landscape and with delinquincies rising, debt collection remains a critical function for financial institutions. However, traditional methods often fall short in efficiency and customer satisfaction. Enter artificial intelligence (AI), a game-changer poised to revolutionize the debt collection industry. This blog post explores the benefits and uses of AI in debt collection, shedding light on how financial institutions can leverage this technology to enhance their strategies. Understanding AI in debt collection Artificial intelligence – which encompasses machine learning, natural language processing, and other advanced technologies – is transforming various industries, including debt collection. AI in debt collection involves using these technologies to automate and optimize processes, making them more efficient and effective. Examples of AI technologies in debt collection include chatbots, predictive analytics, and automated communication systems. Uses Predictive analytics Predictive debt collection analytics is a powerful tool in AI collections. By analyzing patterns and trends in debtor behavior, AI can forecast the likelihood of repayment. This information allows financial institutions to tailor their collection strategies to individual debtors, improving the chances of successful recovery. Chatbots and virtual assistants AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants handle routine customer interactions, providing instant responses to common queries. These tools can escalate complex issues to human agents when necessary, ensuring that customers receive the appropriate level of support. By automating routine tasks, chatbots free up human agents to focus on more complex cases. Automated communication AI can automate communication with debtors, sending payment reminders and notifications through various channels such as email, SMS, and phone calls. These messages can be customized based on debtor profiles, ensuring that communication is personalized and effective. Automated communication helps maintain consistent contact with debtors, increasing the likelihood of timely payments. Benefits Improved operational efficiency One of the most significant advantages of AI in debt collection is improved operational efficiency. AI can automate repetitive tasks such as sending payment reminders and processing payments, reducing the need for manual intervention. This automation speeds up the process, reduces costs, and minimizes human errors, ensuring more accurate and timely collections. Enhanced customer experience AI-driven chatbots and virtual assistants can provide personalized communication, enhancing the customer experience. These AI tools are available 24/7, allowing customers to get instant responses to their queries at any time. By offering a seamless and responsive service, financial institutions can improve customer satisfaction and engagement strategies. Better decision making AI collections leverage predictive analytics to assess debtor risk and provide data-driven insights. This information enables financial institutions to develop more effective collection strategies and prioritize high-risk accounts. By making informed decisions based on predictive models, institutions can optimize collections processes and increase their chances of successful debt recovery. Cost savings Automation through AI can lead to significant cost savings. Financial institutions can achieve higher profitability by reducing the need for human intervention and lowering operational costs. Additionally, increased recovery rates due to better cure strategies contribute to overall cost efficiency. Challenges and considerations While AI offers numerous benefits, there are challenges and considerations to keep in mind. Data privacy and security are paramount, as financial institutions must ensure compliance with regulations such as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Balancing automation with the need for a human touch is also crucial, as some customers may prefer interacting with human agents. Additionally, addressing potential biases in AI algorithms is essential to ensure fair and equitable treatment of all debtors. Future Trends in AI and debt collection The future of AI in debt collection looks promising, with emerging technologies poised to make a significant impact. Integration of AI with other technologies such as blockchain and the Internet of Things (IoT) could further enhance the efficiency and security of debt collection processes. As AI continues to evolve, financial institutions must stay abreast of these trends to remain competitive and effective in their collection strategies. Our debt management and collection solutions With more than 25 years of experience and a comprehensive suite of collection products, our enhanced decisioning, improved processes, and account prioritization can enable your organization to move toward a customer-centric approach that helps reduce losses and control costs. AI in debt collection offers a myriad of benefits, from improved efficiency and enhanced customer experience to better decision-making and cost savings. By leveraging AI technologies such as predictive analytics, chatbots, and automated communication, financial institutions can optimize their debt collection strategies and achieve higher recovery rates. As the industry continues to evolve, embracing AI will be crucial for financial institutions looking to stay ahead of the curve. Click below to learn more about how we can help your organization optimize your debt collection strategies to lose less and recover more. Learn more Watch our webinar on-demand This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.

With the rise of digital interactions, identity fraud has become an unassuming threat that impacts individuals, businesses, and institutions worldwide. According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), 5.4 million consumer reports regarding fraud and consumer protection were filed in 2023. Identity fraud, which is characterized as when an individual's personal information is stolen and used without their consent for fraudulent purposes, has devastating consequences for consumers, including financial losses, damaged credit scores, legal issues, and emotional distress. Financial institutions face damaging consequences beyond financial losses, including reputational damage, operational disruption, and regulatory scrutiny. As technology advances, so do fraudsters' tactics, making it increasingly challenging to detect and prevent identity-related crimes. So, what are financial institutions to do? Industry-leading institutions apply a layered approach to solving fraud that starts with a fraud risk assessment. What is a fraud risk assessment? When opening a new account, banks typically conduct a fraud risk assessment to verify the identity of the individual or entity applying for the account and to assess the likelihood of fraudulent activity. Banks also assess the applicant's credit history, financial background, and transaction patterns to identify red flags or suspicious activity. Advanced fraud detection tools and technologies are employed to monitor account opening activities in real-time and detect signs of fraudulent behavior. This assessment is crucial for ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements, mitigating the risk of financial loss, and safeguarding against identity theft. Understanding the importance of fraud risk assessments A fraud risk assessment is crucial for banks during account opening as it helps verify the identity of applicants and mitigate the risk of fraudulent activity. By assessing the likelihood and potential impact of identity fraud, banks can implement measures to protect customers' assets and protect against losses in their portfolio. Additionally, conducting thorough risk assessments enables banks to comply with regulatory requirements, which mandate the verification of customer identities to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. By adhering to these regulations and implementing effective fraud detection measures, banks can enhance trust and confidence among customers, regulators, and stakeholders, reinforcing the integrity and stability of the financial system. 10 tools to consider when building an effective fraud risk assessment Several key factors should be carefully considered in an identity fraud risk assessment to ensure thorough evaluation and effective mitigation of identity fraud risks. Financial institutions should consider emerging threats and trends such as synthetic identity fraud, account takeover attacks, and social engineering scams when conducting a risk assessment. By staying abreast of evolving tactics used by fraudsters, organizations can proactively adapt their fraud prevention strategies and controls. Here are 10 tools that can help catch red flags for fraud prevention: Identity verification: Identity verification is the first line of defense against identity theft, account takeover, and other fraudulent activities. By verifying the identities of individuals before granting access to services or accounts, organizations can ensure that only legitimate users are granted access. Effective identity verification methods, such as biometric authentication, document verification, and knowledge-based authentication, help mitigate the risk of unauthorized access and fraudulent transactions. Implementing robust identity verification measures protects organizations from financial losses and reputational damage and enhances trust and confidence among customers and stakeholders. Device intelligence: Device intelligence provides insights into the devices used in online transactions, enabling organizations to identify and mitigate fraudulent activities. Organizations can detect suspicious behavior indicative of fraudulent activity by analyzing device-related data such as IP addresses, geolocation, device fingerprints, and behavioral patterns. Device intelligence allows organizations to differentiate between legitimate users and fraudsters, enabling them to implement appropriate security measures, such as device authentication or transaction monitoring. Phone data: Phone and Mobile Network Operator (MNO) data offers valuable insights into the mobile devices and phone numbers used in transactions. By analyzing MNO data such as subscriber information, call records, and location data, organizations can verify the authenticity of users and detect suspicious activities. MNO data enables organizations to confirm the legitimacy of phone numbers, detect SIM swapping or account takeover attempts, and identify fraudulent transactions. Leveraging MNO data allows organizations to strengthen their fraud prevention measures, enhance customer authentication processes, and effectively mitigate the risk of fraudulent activities in an increasingly mobile-driven environment. Email attributes: Email addresses serve as a primary identifier and communication channel for users in digital transactions. Organizations can authenticate user identities, confirm account ownership, and detect suspicious activities such as phishing attempts or identity theft by verifying email addresses. Analyzing email addresses enables organizations to identify patterns of fraudulent behavior, block unauthorized access attempts, and enhance security measures. Furthermore, email address validation helps prevent fraudulent transactions, safeguard sensitive information, and protect against financial losses and reputational damage. Leveraging email addresses as part of fraud prevention strategies enhances trustworthiness in digital interactions. Address verification: Address verification provides essential information for authenticating user identities and detecting suspicious activities. By verifying addresses, organizations can confirm the legitimacy of user accounts, prevent identity theft, and detect fraudulent transactions. Address validation enables organizations to ensure that the provided address matches the user's identity and reduces the risk of fraudulent activities such as account takeover or shipping fraud. Behavioral analytics: Behavioral analytics enables organizations to detect anomalies and patterns indicative of fraudulent activity. By analyzing user behavior, such as transaction history, navigation patterns, and interaction frequency, organizations can identify deviations from normal behavior and flag suspicious activities for further investigation. Behavioral analytics allows organizations to create profiles of typical user behavior and detect deviations that may signal fraud, such as unusual login times or transaction amounts. Consortia: Consortia facilitate collaboration and information sharing among organizations to combat fraudulent activities collectively. By joining forces through consortia, organizations can leverage shared data, insights, and resources to more effectively identify emerging fraud trends, patterns, and threats. Consortia enables participating organizations to benefit from a broader and more comprehensive view of fraudulent activities, enhancing their ability to detect and prevent fraud. Risk engines: Risk engines enable real-time analysis of transaction data and user behavior to detect and mitigate fraudulent activities. By leveraging advanced algorithms and machine learning techniques, risk engines assess the risk associated with each transaction and user interaction, flagging suspicious activities for further investigation or intervention. Risk engines help organizations identify anomalies, patterns, and trends indicative of fraudulent behavior, allowing for timely detection and prevention of fraud. Additionally, risk engines can adapt and evolve over time to stay ahead of emerging threats, enhancing their effectiveness in mitigating fraud. Orchestration streamlines and coordinates the various components of a fraud detection and prevention strategy. By orchestrating different fraud prevention tools, technologies, and processes, organizations can optimize their efforts to combat fraud effectively. Orchestration allows for seamless integration and automation of workflows, enabling real-time data analysis and rapid response to emerging threats. Step-up authentication: Step-up authentication provides an additional layer of security to verify users' identities during high-risk transactions or suspicious activities. By requiring users to provide additional credentials or undergo further authentication steps, such as biometric verification or one-time passcodes, organizations can mitigate the risk of unauthorized access and fraudulent transactions. Step-up authentication allows organizations to dynamically adjust security measures based on the perceived risk level, ensuring that stronger authentication methods are employed when necessary. By layering these tools effectively businesses remove gaps that fraudsters would typically exploit. Learn more

Property managers and landlords nationwide aim to attract reliable, long-term tenants. Gaining insight into modern renters—their tenant data, financial situations, lifestyle choices, and key priorities—gives proactive property owners and managers a competitive edge in appealing to the ideal tenant. While certain elements of the rental landscape are not within the control of market professionals, knowledge is power, and understanding the preferences, spending habits, and profiles of today’s renters can inform their business approach and success. To understand today’s renter, Experian® took a deep dive into the tenant data of the rental market landscape in its 2024 report on the U.S. rental market. Among the principal findings, Generation Z and younger millennials' dominance in this sector is rising. Today’s Renter Profile Experian research reveals movements in the demographics of the average U.S. renter, now dominated by younger individuals and lower average-income consumers. These renters face challenges as they navigate the rising costs of securing housing. The 2024 rental report delves into these changes, highlighting age and income level shifts in tenant data. Critical to property managers and landlords, this information offers an understanding of their customer base and provides insight into the rental market landscape. Gen Z on the Rise: Gen Z alone accounts for 30.5% of all renters, and their numbers are increasing, up 3.5% over a year. Gen Z and younger millennials (adults under 35) represent over 50% of the rental population. Income Declines: From January 2023 to January 2024, the tenant data showed the average income of RentBureau® renters fell from $53,100 to $52,600[1]. Higher Rent Costs: In 2024, over 50% of renters paid $1,500+ per month, with the average U.S. renter's monthly payment of $1,713. Gen Z,the youngest renter population, spends an average of $1,600 monthly on rent. This context plays an important role in examining the state of the 2024 rental market. Propensity to Move In addition to age and economic well-being, landlords should take a keen interest in tenant data related to renters’ moving habits, as these provide valuable insights into behavior and market trends. Landlords generally prefer longer-term leaseholders, and renters who stay longer provide more stability to property management efforts. Not surprisingly, generational trends appear here as well. While over 90% of all renters retained one lease over a 2-year period, tenant data indicates that Gen Z and younger millennial renters tend to move more than other age groups. This tendency stems from various factors, including a willingness to relocate to more affordable regions or areas that better suit their lifestyle preferences. With today’s evolving work environment, remote work has opened new possibilities. Again, the overarching trend is that renters stay in one place for two years. In fact, this represents 92.5% of all renters. Signs of Overall Renter Financial Health Housing is a significant monthly cost of living expense, especially for many younger adults just starting out and lower-income individuals and families. The percentage of a renter’s monthly income allocated to rental costs clearly indicates housing affordability. This tenant data reflects that higher rent-to-income ratios (RTIs) signify that renters have less financial flexibility, as a larger portion of their monthly income is allocated to rent, leaving less available for essentials, savings, and discretionary spending. On average, renters spend over 44% of their monthly income on rent, and low-to-moderate-income renters dedicate over 50% to rent. General guidelines suggest that the percentage should be no more than 30%. Higher rental costs and declining annual incomes disproportionately impact those with fewer financial means. Credit and Other Signs Landlords and property managers value tenant data, such as renter applicants' stability. Indicators such as overall credit quality and negative payment history provide valuable insights into economic well-being. While negative payment history has improved slightly, the market shows a rise in delinquencies. Experian’s research highlights that while credit scores for the general U.S. population are on the rise, the trends for renters tell a slightly different story. Between May 2023 and May 2024, tenant data revealed a 2% increase in renters fell into the near-prime and subprime credit categories. Although the implications for the future remain uncertain, this data, combined with other analytics, may offer clues about market trends and opportunities. The Future The demand for rentals remains high, particularly among young adults and lower-income households. As the economy and market forces fluctuate, so do the financial pressures on renters and rental housing availability and costs. The role of young adults and lower-income households in the rental market will continue. Landlords and property managers must tune in to demographic realities in their efforts to develop risk management and success strategies. To learn more about the state of the U.S. rental market, download Experian’s 2024 rental report. [1] RentBureau income is based on modeled income, which is estimated using credit data and other predictive factors.

As we step into 2025, the convergence of credit and fraud risk has become more pronounced than ever. With fraudsters leveraging emerging technologies and adapting rapidly to new defenses, risk managers need to adopt forward-thinking strategies to protect their organizations and customers. Here are the top fraud trends and actionable resolutions to help you stay ahead of the curve this year. 1. Combat synthetic identity fraud with advanced AI models The trend: Synthetic identity fraud is surging, fueled by data breaches and advanced AI tooling. Fraudsters are combining genuine credentials with fabricated details, creating identities that evade traditional detection methods. Resolution: Invest in sophisticated identity validation tools that leverage advanced AI models. These tools can differentiate between legitimate and fraudulent identities, ensuring faster and more accurate creditworthiness assessments. Focus on integrating these solutions seamlessly into your customer onboarding process to enhance both security and user experience. 2. Strengthen authentication against deepfakes The trend: Deepfake technology is putting immense pressure on existing authentication systems, particularly in high-value transactions and account takeovers. Resolution: Adopt a multilayered authentication strategy that combines voice and facial biometrics with ongoing transaction monitoring. Dynamic authentication methods that evolve based on user behavior and fraud patterns can effectively counter these advanced threats. Invest in solutions that ensure digital interactions remain secure without compromising convenience. 3. Enhance detection of payment scams and APP fraud The trend: Authorized Push Payment (APP) fraud and scams are increasingly difficult to detect because they exploit legitimate customer behaviors. Resolution: Collaborate with industry peers and explore centralized consortia to share insights and develop robust detection strategies. Focus on monitoring both inbound and outbound transactions to identify anomalies, particularly payments to mule accounts. 4. Optimize Your Fraud Stack for Efficiency and Effectiveness The trend: Outdated device and network solutions are no match for GenAI-enhanced fraud tactics. Resolution: Deploy a layered fraud stack with persistent device ID technology, behavioral analytics, and GenAI-driven anomaly detection. Begin with frictionless first-tier tools to filter out low-hanging fraud vectors, reserving more advanced and costly tools for sophisticated threats. Regularly review and refine your stack to ensure it adapts to evolving fraud patterns. 5. Build collaborative relationships with fraud solution vendors The trend: Vendors offer unparalleled industry insights and long-tail data to help organizations prepare for emerging fraud trends. Resolution: Engage in reciprocal knowledge-sharing with your vendors. Leverage advisory boards and industry insights to stay informed about the latest attack vectors. Choose vendors who provide transparency and are invested in your fraud mitigation goals, turning product relationships into strategic partnerships. Turning resolutions into reality Fraudsters are becoming more ingenious, leveraging GenAI and other technologies to exploit vulnerabilities. To stay ahead of fraud in 2025, let us make fraud prevention not just a resolution but a commitment to safeguarding trust and security in a rapidly evolving landscape. Learn more

Bots have been a consistent thorn in fraud teams’ side for years. But since the advent of generative AI (genAI), what used to be just one more fraud type has become a fraud tsunami. This surge in fraud bot attacks has brought with it:  A 108% year-over-year increase in credential stuffing to take over accounts1  A 134% year-over-year increase in carding attacks, where stolen cards are tested1  New account opening fraud at more than 25% of businesses in the first quarter of 2024  While fraud professionals rush to fight back the onslaught, they’re also reckoning with the ever-evolving threat of genAI. A large factor in fraud bots’ new scalability and strength, genAI was the #1 stress point identified by fraud teams in 2024, and 70% expect it to be a challenge moving forward, according to Experian’s U.S. Identity and Fraud Report.  This fear is well-founded. Fraudsters are wasting no time incorporating genAI into their attack arsenal. GenAI has created a new generation of fraud bot tools that make bot development more accessible and sophisticated. These bots reverse-engineer fraud stacks, testing the limits of their targets’ defenses to find triggers for step-ups and checks, then adapt to avoid setting them off.   How do bot detection solutions fare against this next generation of bots?  The evolution of fraud bots   The earliest fraud bots, which first appeared in the 1990s2 , were simple scripts with limited capabilities. Fraudsters soon began using these scripts to execute basic tasks on their behalf — mainly form spam and light data scraping. Fraud teams responded, implementing bot detection solutions that continued to evolve as the threats became more sophisticated.   The evolution of fraud bots was steady — and mostly balanced against fraud-fighting tools — until genAI supercharged it. Today, fraudsters are leveraging genAI’s core ability (analyzing datasets and identifying patterns, then using those patterns to generate solutions) to create bots capable of large-scale attacks with unprecedented sophistication. These genAI-powered fraud bots can analyze onboarding flows to identify step-up triggers, automate attacks at high-volume times, and even conduct “behavior hijacking,” where bots record and replicate the behaviors of real users.  How next-generation fraud bots beat fraud stacks  For years, a tried-and-true tool for fraud bot detection was to look for the non-human giveaways: lightning-fast transition speeds, eerily consistent keystrokes, nonexistent mouse movements, and/or repeated device and network data were all tell-tale signs of a bot. Fraud teams could base their bot detection strategies off of these behavioral red flags.  Stopping today’s next-generation fraud bots isn’t quite as straightforward. Because they were specifically built to mimic human behavior and cycle through device IDs and IP addresses, today’s bots often appear to be normal, human applicants and circumvent many of the barriers that blocked their predecessors. The data the bots are providing is better, too3, fraudsters are using genAI to streamline and scale the creation of synthetic identities.4 By equipping their human-like bots with a bank of high-quality synthetic identities, fraudsters have their most potent, advanced attack avenue to date.   Skirting traditional bot detection with their human-like capabilities, next-generation fraud bots can bombard their targets with massive, often undetected, attacks. In one attack analyzed by NeuroID, a part of Experian, fraud bots made up 31% of a business's onboarding volume on a single day. That’s nearly one-third of the business’s volume comprised of bots attempting to commit fraud. If the business hadn’t had the right tools in place to separate these bots from genuine users, they wouldn’t have been able to stop the attack until it was too late.   Beating fraud bots with behavioral analytics: The next-generation approach  Next-generation fraud bots pose a unique threat to digital businesses: their data appears legitimate, and they look like a human when they’re interacting with a form. So how do fraud teams differentiate fraud bots from an actual human user?  NeuroID’s product development teams discovered key nuances that separate next-generation bots from humans, and we’ve updated our industry-leading bot detection capabilities to account for them. A big one is mousing patterns: random, erratic cursor movements are part of what makes next-generation bots so eerily human-like, but their movements are still noticeably smoother than a real human’s. Other bot detection solutions (including our V1 signal) wouldn’t flag these advanced cursor movements as bot behavior, but our new signal is designed to identify even the most granular giveaways of a next-generation fraud bot.  Fraud bots will continue to evolve. But so will we. For example, behavioral analytics can identify repeated actions — down to the pixel a cursor lands on — during a bot attack and block out users exhibiting those behaviors. Our behavior was built specifically to combat next-gen challenges with scalable, real-time solutions. This proactive protection against advanced bot behaviors is crucial to preventing larger attacks.  For more on fraud bots’ evolution, download our Emerging Trends in Fraud: Understanding and Combating Next-Gen Bots report.  Learn more Sources 1 HUMAN Enterprise Bot Fraud Benchmark Report  2 Abusix 3 NeuroID 4 Biometric Update

Protecting consumer information is paramount in today’s digital age, especially for financial institutions. With cyber threats on the rise, robust user authentication methods are essential to safeguard sensitive data. This guide will walk you through the various user authentication types and methods, focusing on solutions that can help financial institutions enhance their security measures and protect consumers’ personal information. Understanding user authentication types Single-factor authentication (SFA) Single-factor authentication is the most basic form of authentication, requiring only one piece of information, such as a password. While it's easy to implement, SFA has significant drawbacks, particularly in the financial sector where security is critical. Passwords can be easily compromised through phishing or brute force attacks, making SFA insufficient on its own. Two-factor authentication (2FA) Two-factor authentication uses two different factors to verify a user's identity. For example, a bank might require a consumer to enter their password and then confirm their identity with a code sent to their mobile device. This method enhances security without overcomplicating the user experience. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) Multi-factor authentication adds an extra layer of security by requiring two or more verification factors. These factors typically include something you know (a password), something you have (a token or smartphone), and something you can present with your body, such as a fingerprint or facial scan (biometric data). MFA significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access, making it a crucial component for financial institutions. Common authentication methods Password-based authentication Passwords are the most common form of authentication. However, they come with challenges, especially in the financial sector. Weak or reused passwords can be easily exploited. Financial institutions should enforce strong password policies and educate consumers on creating secure passwords. Biometric authentication Biometric authentication uses unique biological characteristics, such as fingerprints, facial recognition, or iris scans to verify identity. This method is becoming increasingly popular in banking due to its convenience and high level of security. However, a potential drawback is that it also raises privacy concerns. Token-based authentication Token-based authentication involves the use of physical or software tokens. Physical tokens, like smart cards, generate a one-time code for login. Software tokens, such as mobile apps, provide similar functionality. This method is highly secure and is often used in financial transactions. Certificate-based authentication Certificate-based authentication uses digital certificates to establish a secure connection. This method is commonly used in secure communications within financial systems. While it offers robust security, implementing and managing digital certificates can be complex. Two-factor authentication (2FA) solutions 2FA is a practical and effective way to enhance security. Popular methods include SMS-based codes, app-based authentication, and email-based verification. Each method has its pros and cons, but all provide an additional layer of security that is vital for protecting financial data. Many financial institutions have successfully implemented two factor authentication solutions. For example, a bank might use SMS-based 2FA to verify transactions, significantly reducing fraud. Another institution might adopt app-based 2FA, offering consumers a more secure and convenient way to authenticate their identity. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) solutions MFA is essential for financial institutions aiming to enhance security. Multifactor authentication solutions can provide multiple layers of protection and ensure that even if one factor is compromised, unauthorized access is still prevented. Implementing MFA requires careful planning. Financial institutions should start by assessing their current security measures and identifying areas for improvement. It's crucial to choose MFA solutions that integrate seamlessly with existing systems. Training staff and educating consumers on the importance of MFA can also help ensure a smooth transition. Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) solutions What is KBA? Knowledge-based authentication relies on information that only the user should know, such as answers to security questions. There are two types: static KBA, which uses pre-set questions, and dynamic KBA, which generates questions based on the user's transaction history or other data. Effectiveness of KBA While KBA can be effective, it has its limitations. Static KBA is vulnerable to social engineering attacks, where fraudsters gather information about the user to answer security questions. Dynamic KBA offers more security but can be more complex to implement. Financial institutions should weigh the pros and cons of KBA and consider combining it with other methods for enhanced security. Enhancing KBA security To improve KBA security, financial institutions can combine it with other user authentication types, such as MFA or 2FA. This layered approach ensures that even if one method is compromised, additional layers of security are in place. Best practices for knowledge based authentication solutions include regularly updating security questions and using questions that are difficult for others to guess. Using authentication methods to protect consumer information Choosing the right authentication methods is crucial for financial institutions to protect consumer information and maintain trust. By understanding and implementing robust authentication solutions like MFA, 2FA, and KBA, banks and financial services can significantly enhance their security posture. As cyber threats continue to evolve, staying ahead with advanced authentication methods will be key to safeguarding sensitive data and ensuring consumer confidence. Experian’s multifactor authentication solutions can enhance your existing authentication process while reducing friction, using risk-assessment tools to apply the appropriate level of security. Learn how your organization can provide faster, more agile mobile transactions, risk protection for your business, and security and peace of mind for your consumers. Visit our website to learn more This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.

Dormant fraud, sleeper fraud, trojan horse fraud . . . whatever you call it, it’s an especially insidious form of account takeover fraud (ATO) that fraud teams often can’t detect until it’s too late. Fraudsters create accounts with stolen credentials or gain access to existing ones, onboard under the fake identity, then lie low, waiting for an opportunity to attack.   It takes a strategic approach to defeat the enemy from within, and fraudsters assume you won’t have the tools in place to even know where to start.   Dormant fraud uncovered: A case study  NeuroID, a part of Experian, has seen the dangers of dormant fraud play out in real time.  As a new customer to NeuroID, this payment processor wanted to backtest their user base for potential signs of fraud. Upon analyzing their customer base’s onboarding behavioral data, we discovered more than 100K accounts were likely to be dormant fraud. The payment processor hadn’t considered these accounts suspicious and didn’t see any risk in letting them remain active, despite the fact that none of them had completed a transaction since onboarding.  Why did we flag these as risky?  Low familiarity: Our testing revealed behavioral red flags, such as copying and pasting into fields or constant tab switching. These are high indicators that the applicant is applying with personally identifiable information (PII) that isn’t their own.  Fraud clusters: Many of these accounts used the same web browser, device, and IP address during sign-up, suggesting that one fraudster was signing up for multiple accounts. We found hundreds of clusters like these, many with 50 or more accounts belonging to the same device and IP address within our customer’s user base.  It was clear that this payment processor’s fraud stack had gaps that left them vulnerable. These dormant accounts could have caused significant damage once mobilized: receiving or transferring stolen funds, misrepresenting their financial position, or building toward a bust-out.   Dormant fraud thrives in the shadows beyond onboarding. These fraudsters keep accounts “dormant” until they’re long past onboarding detection measures. And once they’re in, they can often easily transition to a higher-risk account — after all, they’ve already confirmed they’re trustworthy. This type of attack can involve fraudulent accounts remaining inactive for months, allowing them to bypass standard fraud detection methods that focus on immediate indicators.   Dormant fraud gets even more dangerous when a hijacked account has built trust just by existing. For example, some banks provide a higher credit line just for current customers, no matter their activities to date. The more accounts an identity has in good standing, the greater the chance that they’ll be mistaken for a good customer and given even more opportunities to commit higher-level fraud.  This is why we often talk to our customers about the idea of progressive onboarding as a way to overcome both dormant fraud risks and the onboarding friction caused by asking for too much information, too soon.   Progressive onboarding, dormant fraud, and the friction balance  Progressive onboarding shifts from the one-size-fits-all model by gathering only truly essential information initially and asking for more as customers engage more. This is a direct counterbalance to the approach that sometimes turns customers off by asking for too much too soon, and adding too much friction at initial onboarding. It also helps ensure ongoing checks that fight dormant fraud. We’ve seen this approach (already growing popular in payment processing) be especially useful in every type of financial business. Here’s how it works:  A prospect visits your site to explore options. They may just want to understand fees and get a feel for your offerings. At this stage, you might ask for minimal information — just a name and email — without requiring a full fraud check or credit score. It’s a low commitment ask that keeps things simple for casual prospects who are just browsing, while also keeping your costs low so you don’t spend a full fraud check on an uncommitted visitor.   As the prospect becomes a true customer and begins making small transactions, say a $50 transfer, you request additional details like their date of birth, physical address, or phone number. This minor step-up in information allows for a basic behavioral analytics fraud check while maintaining a low barrier of time and PII-requested for a low-risk activity.  With each new level of engagement and transaction value, the information requested increases accordingly. If the customer wants to transfer larger amounts, like $5,000, they’ll understand the need to provide more details — it aligns with the idea of a privacy trade-off, where the customer’s willingness to share information grows as their trust and need for services increase. Meanwhile, your business allocates resources to those who are fully engaged, rather than to one-time visitors or casual sign-ups, and keeps an eye on dormant fraudsters who might have expected no barrier to additional transactions.  Progressive onboarding is not just an effective approach for dormant fraud and onboarding friction, but also in fighting fraudsters who sneak in through unseen gaps. In another case, we worked with a consumer finance platform to help identify gaps in their fraud stack. In one attack, fraudsters probed until they found the product with the easiest barrier of entry: once inside they went on to immediately commit a full-force bot attack on higher value returns. The attack wasn’t based on dormancy, but on complacency. The fraudsters assumed this consumer finance platform wouldn’t realize that a low controls onboarding for one solution could lead to ease of access to much more. And they were right.  After closing that vulnerability, we helped this customer work to create progressive onboarding that includes behavior-based fraud controls for every single user, including those already with accounts, who had built that assumed trust, and for low-risk entry-points. This weeded out any dormant fraudsters already onboarded who were trying to take advantage of that trust, as they had to go through behavioral analytics and other new controls based on the risk-level of the product.   Behavioral analytics gives you confidence that every customer is trustworthy, from the moment they enter the front door to even after they’ve kicked off their shoes to stay a while.  Behavioral analytics shines a light on shadowy corners  Behavioral analytics are proven beyond just onboarding — within any part of a user interaction, our signals detect low familiarity, high-risk behavior and likely fraud clusters. In our experience, building a progressive onboarding approach with just these two signal points alone would provide significant results — and would help stop sophisticated fraudsters from perpetrating dormant fraud, including large-scale bust outs.  Want to find out how progressive onboarding might work for you? Contact us for a free demo and deep dive into how behavioral analytics can help throughout your user journey.  Contact us for a free demo

A tale of synthetic ID fraud Synthetic ID fraud is an increasing issue and affects everyone, including high-profile individuals. A notable case from Ohio involved Warren Hayes, who managed to get an official ID card in the name of “Santa Claus” from the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles. He also registered a vehicle, opened a bank account, and secured an AAA membership under this name, listing his address as 1 Noel Drive, North Pole, USA. This elaborate ruse unraveled after Hayes, disguised as Santa, got into a minor car accident. When the police requested identification, Hayes presented his Santa Claus ID. He was subsequently charged under an Ohio law prohibiting the use of fictitious names. However, the court—presided over by Judge Thomas Gysegem—dismissed the charge, arguing that because Hayes had used the ID for over 20 years, "Santa Claus" was effectively a "real person" in the eyes of the law. The judge’s ruling raised eyebrows and left one glaring question unanswered: how could official documents in such a blatantly fictitious name go undetected for two decades? From Santa Claus to synthetic IDs: the modern-day threat The Hayes case might sound like a holiday comedy, but it highlights a significant issue that organizations face today: synthetic identity fraud. Unlike traditional identity theft, synthetic ID fraud does not rely on stealing an existing identity. Instead, fraudsters combine real and fictitious details to create a new “person.” Think of it as an elaborate game of make-believe, where the stakes are millions of dollars. These synthetic identities can remain under the radar for years, building credit profiles, obtaining loans, and committing large-scale fraud before detection. Just as Hayes tricked the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, fraudsters exploit weak verification processes to pass as legitimate individuals. According to KPMG, synthetic identity fraud bears a staggering $6 billion cost to banks.To perpetrate the crime, malicious actors leverage a combination of real and fake information to fabricate a synthetic identity, also known as a “Frankenstein ID.” The financial industry classifies various types of synthetic identity fraud. Manipulated Synthetics – A real person’s data is modified to create variations of that identity. Frankenstein Synthetics – The data represents a combination of multiple real people. Manufactured Synthetics – The identity is completely synthetic. How organizations can combat synthetic ID fraud A multifaceted approach to detecting synthetic identities that integrates advanced technologies can form the foundation of a sound fraud prevention strategy: Advanced identity verification tools: Use AI-powered tools that cross-check identity attributes across multiple data points to flag inconsistencies. Behavioral analytics: Monitor user behaviors to detect anomalies that may indicate synthetic identities. For instance, a newly created account applying for a large loan with perfect credit is a red flag. Digital identity verification: Implement digital onboarding processes that include online identity verification with real-time document verification. Users can upload government-issued IDs and take selfies to confirm their identity. Collaboration and data sharing: Organizations can share insights about suspected synthetic identities to prevent fraudsters from exploiting gaps between industries. Ongoing employee training: Ensure frontline staff can identify suspicious applications and escalate potential fraud cases. Regulatory support: Governments and regulators can help by standardizing ID issuance processes and requiring more stringent checks. Closing thoughts The tale of Santa Claus’ stolen identity may be entertaining, but it underscores the need for vigilance against synthetic ID fraud. As we move into an increasingly digital age, organizations must stay ahead of fraudsters by leveraging technology, training, and collaboration. Because while the idea of Spiderman or Catwoman walking into your branch may seem amusing, the financial and reputational cost of synthetic ID fraud is no laughing matter. Learn more

Despite being a decades-old technology, behavioral analytics is often still misunderstood. We’ve heard from fraud, identity, security, product, and risk professionals that exploring a behavior-based fraud solution brings up big questions, such as: What does behavioral analytics provide that I don’t get now? (Quick answer: a whole new signal and an earlier view of fraud) Why do I need to add even more data to my fraud stack? (Quick answer: it acts with your stack to add insights, not overload) How is this different from biometrics? (Quick answer: while biometrics track characteristics, behavioral analytics tracks distinct actions) These questions make sense — stopping fraud is complex, and, of course, you want to do your research to fully understand what ROI any tool will add. NeuroID, now part of Experian, is one of the only behavioral analytics-first businesses built specifically for stopping fraud. Our internal experts have been crafting behavioral-first solutions to detect everything from simple script fraud bots through to generative AI (genAI) attacks. We know how behavioral analytics works best within your fraud stack, and how to think strategically about using it to stop fraud rings, bot fraud, and other third-party fraud attacks. This primer will provide answers to the biggest questions we hear, so you can make the most informed decisions when exploring how our behavioral analytics solutions could work for you. Q1. What is behavioral analytics and how is it different from behavioral biometrics? A common mistake is to conflate behavioral analytics with behavioral biometrics. But biometrics rely on unique physical characteristics — like fingerprints or facial scans — used for automated recognition, such as unlocking your phone with Face ID. Biometrics connect a person’s data to their identity. But behavioral analytics? They don’t look at an identity. They look at behavior and predict risk. While biometrics track who a person is, behavioral analytics track what they do. For example, NeuroID’s behavioral analytics observes every time someone clicks in a box, edits a field, or hovers over a section. So, when a user’s actions suggest fraudulent intent, they can be directed to additional verification steps or fully denied. And if their actions suggest trustworthiness? They can be fast-tracked. Or, as a customer of ours put it: "Using NeuroID decisioning, we can confidently reject bad actors today who we used to take to step-up. We also have enough information on good applicants sooner, so we can fast-track them and say ‘go ahead and get your loan, we don’t need anything else from you.’ And customers really love that." - Mauro Jacome, Head of Data Science for Addi (read the full Addi case study here). The difference might seem subtle, but it’s important. New laws on biometrics have triggered profound implications for banks, businesses, and fraud prevention strategies. The laws introduce potential legal liabilities, increased compliance costs, and are part of a growing public backlash over privacy concerns. Behavioral signals, because they don’t tie behavior to identity, are often easier to introduce and don’t need the same level of regulatory scrutiny. The bottom line is that our behavioral analytics capabilities are unique from any other part of your fraud stack, full-stop. And it's because we don’t identify users, we identify intentions. Simply by tracking users’ behavior on your digital form, behavioral analytics powered by NeuroID tells you if a user is human or a bot; trustworthy or risky. It looks at each click, edit, keystroke, pause, and other tiny interactions to measure every users’ intention. By combining behavior with device and network intelligence, our solutions provide new visibility into fraudsters hiding behind perfect PII and suspicious devices. The result is reduced fraud costs, fewer API calls, and top-of-the-funnel fraud capture with no tuning or model integration on day one. With behavioral analytics, our customers can detect fraud attacks in minutes, instead of days. Our solutions have proven results of detecting up to 90% of fraud with 99% accuracy (or <1% false positive rate) with less than 3% of your population getting flagged. Q2. What does behavioral analytics provide that I don’t get now? Behavioral analytics provides a net-new signal that you can’t get from any other tools. One of our customers, Josh Eurom, Manager of Fraud for Aspiration Banking, described it this way: “You can quantify some things very easily: if bad domains are coming through you can identify and stop it. But if you see things look odd, yet you can’t set up controls, that’s where NeuroID behavioral analytics come in and captures the unseen fraud.” (read the full Aspiration story here) Adding yet another new technology with big promises may not feel urgent. But with genAI fueling synthetic identity fraud, next-gen fraud bots, and hyper-efficient fraud ring attacks, time is running out to modernize your stack. In addition, many fraud prevention tools today only focus on what PII is submitted — and PII is notoriously easy to fake. Only behavioral analytics looks at how the data is submitted. Behavioral analytics is a crucial signal for detecting even the most modern fraud techniques. Watch our webinar: The Fraud Bot Future-Shock: How to Spot and Stop Next-Gen Attacks  Q3. Why do I need to add even more data to my fraud stack? Balancing fraud, friction, and financial impact has led to increasingly complex fraud stacks that often slow conversions and limit visibility. As fraudsters evolve, gaps grow between how quickly you can keep up with their new technology. Fraudsters have no budget constraints, compliance requirements, or approval processes holding them back from implementing new technology to attack your stack, so they have an inherent advantage. Many fraud teams we hear from are looking for ways to optimize their workflows without adding to the data noise, while balancing all the factors that a fraud stack influences beyond overall security (such as false positives and unnecessary friction). Behavioral analytics is a great way to work smarter with what you have. The signals add no friction to the onboarding process, are undetectable to your customers, and live on a pre-submit level, using data that is already captured by your existing application process. Without requiring any new inputs from your users or stepping into messy biometric legal gray areas, behavioral analytics aggregates, sorts, and reviews a broad range of cross-channel, historical, and current customer behaviors to develop clear, real-time portraits of transactional risks. By sitting top-of-funnel, behavioral analytics not only doesn’t add to the data noise, it actually clarifies the data you currently rely on by taking pressure off of your other tools. With these insights, you can make better fraud decisions, faster. Or, as Eurom put it: “Before NeuroID, we were not automatically denying applications. They were getting an IDV check and going into a manual review. But with NeuroID at the top of our funnel, we implemented automatic denial based on the risky signal, saving us additional API calls and reviews. And we’re capturing roughly four times more fraud. Having behavioral data to reinforce our decision-making is a relief.” The behavioral analytics difference Since the world has moved online, we’re missing the body language clues that used to tell us if someone was a fraudster. Behavioral analytics provides the digital body language differentiator. Behavioral cues — such as typing speed, hesitation, and mouse movements — highlight riskiness. The cause of that risk could be bots, stolen information, fraud rings, synthetic identities, or any combination of third-party fraud attack strategies. Behavioral analytics gives you insights to distinguish between genuine applicants and potentially fraudulent ones without disrupting your customer’s journey. By interpreting behavioral patterns at the very top of the onboarding funnel, behavior helps you proactively mitigate fraud, reduce false positives, and streamline onboarding, so you can lock out fraudsters and let in legitimate users. This is all from data you already capture, simply tracking interactions on your site. Stop fraud, faster: 5 simple uses where behavioral analytics shine  While how you approach a behavioral analytics integration will vary based on numerous factors, here are some of the immediate, common use cases of behavioral analytics.  Detecting fraud bots and fraud rings Behavioral analytics can identify fraud bots by their frameworks, such as Puppeter or Stealth, and through their behavioral patterns, so you can protect against even the most sophisticated fourth-generation bots. NeuroID provides holistic coverage for bot and fraud ring detection — passively and with no customer friction, often eliminating the need for CAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA. With this data alone, you could potentially blacklist suspected fraud bot and fraud ring attacks at the top of the fraud prevention funnel, avoiding extra API calls. Sussing out scams and coercions When users make account changes or transactions under coercion, they often show unfamiliarity with the destination account or shipping address entered. Our real-time assessment detects these risk indicators, including hesitancy, multiple corrections, and slow typing, alerting you in real-time to look closer. Stopping use of compromised cards and stolen IDs Traditional PII methods can fall short against today’s sophisticated synthetic identity fraud. Behavioral analytics uncovers synthetic identities by evaluating how PII is entered, instead of relying on PII itself (which is often corrupted). For example, our behavioral signals can assess users’ familiarity with the billing address they’re entering for a credit card or bank account. Genuine account holders will show strong familiarity, while signs of unfamiliarity are indicators of an account under attack. Detecting money mules Our behavioral analytics solutions track how familiar users are with the addresses they enter, conducting a real-time, sub-millisecond familiarity assessment. Risk markers such as hesitancy, multiple corrections, slow typing speed raise flags for further exploration. Stopping promotion and discount abuse Our behavioral analytics identifies risky versus trustworthy users in promo and discount fields. By assessing behavior, device, and network risk, we help you determine if your promotions attract more risky than trustworthy users, preventing fraudsters from abusing discounts. Learn more about our behavioral analytics solutions. Learn more Watch webinar

As online accounts become essential for activities ranging from shopping and social media to banking, "account farming" has emerged as a significant fraud risk. This practice involves creating fake or unauthorized accounts en masse, often for malicious purposes. Understanding how account farming works, why it’s done and how businesses can protect themselves is crucial for maintaining data integrity, safeguarding customer trust and protecting your bottom line. How does account farming work? Account farming is the process of creating and cultivating multiple user accounts, often using fake or stolen identities. These accounts may look like legitimate users, but they’re controlled by a single entity or organization, usually with fraudulent intent. Here’s a breakdown of the typical steps involved in account farming: Identity generation: Account farmers start by obtaining either fake or stolen personal information. They may buy these datasets on the dark web or scrape publicly available information to make each account seem legitimate. Account creation: Using bots or manual processes, fraudsters create numerous accounts on a platform. Often, they’ll employ automated tools to expedite this process, bypassing CAPTCHA or reCAPTCHA systems or using proxy servers to mask their IP addresses and avoid detection. Warm-up phase: After initial creation, account farmers often let the accounts sit for a while, engaging in limited, non-suspicious activity to avoid triggering security alerts. This “warming up” process helps the accounts seem more authentic. Activation for fraudulent activity: Once these accounts reach a level of credibility, they’re activated for the intended purpose. This might include spamming, fraud, phishing, fake reviews or promotional manipulation. Why is account farming done? There are several reasons account farming has become a widespread problem across different industries. Here are some common motivations: Monetary gain: Fraudsters use farmed accounts to commit fraudulent transactions, like applying for loans and credit products, accessing promotional incentives or exploiting referral programs. Spam and phishing: Fake accounts enable widespread spam campaigns or phishing attacks, compromising customer data and damaging brand reputation. Data theft: By creating and controlling multiple accounts, fraudsters may access sensitive data, leading to further exploitation or resale on the dark web. Manipulating metrics and market perception: Some industries use account farming to boost visibility and credibility falsely. For example, on social media, fake accounts can be used to inflate follower counts or engagement metrics. In e-commerce, fraudsters may create fake accounts to leave fake reviews or upvote products, falsely boosting perceived popularity and manipulating purchasing decisions. How does account farming lead to fraud risks? Account farming is a serious problem that can expose businesses and their customers to a variety of risks: Financial loss: Fake accounts created to exploit promotional offers or referral programs can cause victims to experience significant financial losses. Additionally, businesses can incur costs from chargebacks or fraudulent refunds triggered by these accounts. Compromised customer experience: Legitimate customers may suffer from poor experiences, such as spam messages, unsolicited emails or fraudulent interactions. This leads to diminished brand trust, which is costly to regain. Data breaches and compliance risks: Account farming often relies on stolen data, increasing the risk of data breaches. Businesses subject to regulations like GDPR or CCPA may face hefty fines if they fail to protect consumer information adequately. READ MORE: Our Data Breach Industry Forecast predicts what’s in store for the coming year. How can businesses protect themselves from account farming fraud? As account farming tactics evolve, businesses need a proactive and sophisticated approach to detect and prevent these fraudulent activities. Experian’s fraud risk management solutions provide multilayered and customizable solutions to help companies safeguard themselves against account farming and other types of fraud. Here’s how we can help: Identity verification solutions: Experian’s fraud risk and identity verification platform integrates multiple verification methods to confirm the authenticity of user identities. Through real-time data validation, businesses can verify the legitimacy of user information provided at the account creation stage, detecting and blocking fake identities early in the process. Its flexible architecture allows companies to adapt their identity verification process as new fraud patterns emerge, helping them stay one step ahead of account farmers. Behavioral analytics: One effective way to identify account farming is to analyze user behavior for patterns consistent with automated or scripted actions (AKA “bots”). Experian’s behavioral analytics solutions, powered by NeuroID, use advanced machine learning algorithms to identify unusual behavioral trends among accounts. By monitoring how users interact with a platform, we can detect patterns common in farmed accounts, like uniform interactions or repetitive actions that don’t align with human behavior. Device intelligence: To prevent account farming fraud, it’s essential to go beyond user data and examine the devices used to create and access accounts. Experian’s solutions combine device intelligence with identity verification to flag suspicious devices associated with multiple accounts. For example, account farmers often use virtual machines, proxies or emulators to create accounts without revealing their actual location or device details. By identifying and flagging these high-risk devices, we help prevent fraudulent accounts from slipping through the cracks. Velocity checks: Velocity checks are another way to block fraudulent account creation. By monitoring the frequency and speed at which new accounts are created from specific IP addresses or devices, Experian’s fraud prevention solutions can identify spikes indicative of account farming. These velocity checks work in real-time, enabling businesses to act immediately to block suspicious activity and minimize the risk of fake account creation. Continuous monitoring and risk scoring: Even after initial account creation, continuous monitoring of user activity helps to identify accounts that may have initially bypassed detection but later engage in suspicious behavior. Experian’s risk scoring system assigns a fraud risk score to each account based on its behavior over time, alerting businesses to potential threats before they escalate. Final thoughts: Staying ahead of account farming fraud Preventing account farming is about more than just blocking bots — it’s about safeguarding your business and its customers against fraud risk. By understanding the mechanics of account farming and using a multi-layered approach to fraud detection and identity verification, businesses can protect themselves effectively. Ready to take a proactive stance against account farming and other evolving fraud tactics? Explore our comprehensive solutions today. Learn More This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.