Apply DA Tag

Cybersecurity has become one of the most significant issues impacting international security and political and economic stability. Our new report, Data Breach Industry Forecast 2018, outlines 5 predictions for the data breach industry in the coming year. Here are 3: The U.S. may experience its first large-scale attack on critical infrastructure, causing disruption for governments, companies and private citizens. Failure to comply with the new EU regulations will result in large penalties for U.S. companies. Attackers will use artificial intelligence to render traditional multifactor authentication methods useless. Read all five predictions>

Auto originations continue to increase — particularly within prime categories. According to Experian’s latest State of the Automotive Finance Market report: Prime consumers grabbed the lion’s share of the total finance market, at 40.9%. Super-prime buyers showed the largest increase, reaching 20.2%. Consumers outside the prime category (credit score of 600 or lower) decreased to the lowest share on record since 2012. Credit unions and captive lenders increased market share of total vehicle financing, growing to 21% and 29.8% — an increase of 6.9% and 35.1%, respectively. As auto loan originations continue their upward trend, lenders can stay ahead of the competition by using advanced analytics to target the right customers and increase profitability.  

Traditional verification and validation parameters alone are not enough to stop identity fraud. Fortunately, there are many emerging trends and best practices for modern fraud and identity strategies: Applying right-sized fraud and identity proofing solutions to reduce user friction and manage fraud risk appropriately. Maintaining a universal user view by employing diverse breadth and depth of data assets and applied analytics. Expanding the user view through a blended ecosystem by collaborating with vendors, peer agencies, and partners in identity and fraud management. The future of identity proofing is more than just verifying individual identities. Check out our tip sheet linked below for more strategies. Modernize your fraud and identity strategies>

For most businesses, the customer experience is at the heart of every strategy. Debt collection shouldn’t be different. Here’s why: 21% of visits to an online debt recovery system were made outside the traditional working hours of 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Of the consumers who committed to a repayment plan, only 56% did so in a single visit. PricewaterhouseCoopers reported that 46% of consumers use only digital channels to conduct banking, avoiding traditional offline channels. Conversely, data collected by Gallup between 2013 and 2016 showed that 48% of American banking customers would only consider using a bank that offered physical branches. The debt collection process is an often-overlooked opportunity to build customer relationships and loyalty. Leverage data and technology to replace outdated approaches, minimize charge-offs and create environments that value each customer. Learn more>

It’s no secret. Consumers engage and interact with brands through a variety of channels, including email, direct mail, websites and mobile. And since most organizations work to keep the consumer experience at the core, they tend to invest in an omnichannel approach that caters to the consumer’s preferences. The lone exception may be during the collections process. Often, once an account falls behind on payment, the consumer experience falls behind with it. But should it? While many banks and financial institutions view the collections process merely as an opportunity to collect outstanding debt, the potential is much more. If treated effectively, the collections process can present an opportunity to develop a positive customer relationship that builds loyalty over time. If handled poorly, the collections process could cost an organization a number of lifetime customers. To correct this, banks and financial institutions need to implement the same omnichannel approach in the collections process as they do with every other consumer interaction. Collections can no longer be treated as a linear process that leads from one channel to the next. There needs to be a more personalized touch — communicating with consumers through preferred channels, contacting them at the most opportune times. Sound complex? Sure. But consider a recent Experian analysis that invited consumers to establish a nonthreatening dialogue with an online debt recovery system. The analysis revealed 21 percent of visits to an organization’s website were outside the traditional working hours of 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Furthermore, of the consumers who committed to a repayment plan, only 56 percent did so in a single visit. Each consumer is different. So is each situation. And banks and financial institutions need to acknowledge those differences. Luckily, technology can address the complexities of an omnichannel and personalized approach. Platforms such as Experian’s PowerCurve® Collections enable banks and financial institutions to simplify the collections process for both the consumer and the organization. By treating the collections process the same as any other stage in the consumer journey, organizations have an opportunity to build a relationship. And to do so, banks and financial institutions need to leverage the data and technology at their disposal. If they do so appropriately, they’ll minimize their charge-offs and also create a lifetime customer. To learn more about leveraging the collections process to build customer loyalty, download our white paper Getting in front of the shift to omnichannel collections.

Experian on the State of Identity podcast In today’s environment, any conversation on the identity management industry needs to include some mention of synthetic identity risk. The fact is, it’s top of mind for almost everyone. Institutions are trying to scope their risk level and identify losses, while service providers are innovating ways to solve the problem. Even consumers are starting to understand the term, albeit via a local newscast designed to scare the heck out of them. With all this in mind, I was very happy to be invited to speak with Cameron D’Ambrosi at One World Identity (OWI) on the State of Identity podcast, focusing on synthetic identity fraud. Our discussion focused on some of the unique findings and recommended best practices highlighted in our recently published white paper on the subject, Synthetic identities: getting real with customers. Additionally, we discussed how a lack of agreement on the definition and size of the synthetic identity problem further complicates the issue. This all stems from inconsistent loss reporting, a lack of confirmable victims and an absence of an exact definition of a synthetic identity to begin with. Discussions must continue to better align us all. I certainly appreciate that OWI dedicated the podcast to this subject. And I hope listeners take away a few helpful points that can assist them in their organization’s efforts to better identify synthetic identities, reduce financial losses and minimize reputation risks.

Sophisticated criminals work hard to create convincing, verifiable personas they can use to commit fraud. Here are the 3 main ways fraudsters manufacture synthetic IDs: Credit applications and inquiries that build a synthetic credit profile over time. Exploitation of authorized user processes to take over or piggyback on legitimate profiles. Data furnishing schemes to falsify regular credit reporting agency updates. Fraudsters are highly motivated to innovate their approaches rapidly. You need to implement a solution that addresses the continuing rise of synthetic IDs from multiple engagement points. Learn more

With 81% of Americans having a social media profile, you may wonder if social media insights can be used to assess credit risk. When considering social media data as it pertains to financial decisions, there are 3 key concerns to consider. The ECOA requires that credit must be extended to all creditworthy applicants regardless of race, religion, gender, marital status, age and other personal characteristics. Social media can reveal these characteristics and inadvertently affect decisions. Social media data can be manipulated. Individuals can represent themselves as financially responsible when they’re not. On the flip side, consumers can’t manipulate their payment history. When it comes to credit decisions, always remember that the FCRA trumps everything. Data is essential for all aspects of the financial services industry, but it’s still too early to click the “like” button for social media. Make more insightful decisions with credit attributes>

The sheer range of dynamic and emerging fraud tactics can impede agencies from achieving security. These threats must be met with a variety of identity proofing and management tactics. Without monitoring, performance assessments and tuning, a singular and static identity proofing strategy can be exposed by evolving schemes and the use of high-quality compromised identity data. Traditional verification and validation parameters alone are simply too obtuse and can be circumvented easily by those with criminal intent. Static rules based on overly simplistic verification and validation checks can be outsmarted by intelligent fraudsters. Conversely, those same static rules must also have built-in mechanisms to accommodate true-name users who initially may not meet that criteria for identity proofing. Vast and diverse user populations, more arduous — and arguably more difficult to achieve — digital identity guidelines put forth by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and operational constraints all pose significant challenges for government. But there are ways for government to modernize identity proofing successfully. Modern fraud and identity strategies There are many emerging trends and best practices for modern fraud and identity strategies, including: Applying right-sized fraud and identity proofing solutions. To reduce user friction or service disruption and manage fraud risk appropriately, agencies need to apply fraud mitigation strategies. Such strategies reflect the cost, measured risk and level of confidence, as well as compliance needed, for each interaction. This is called right-sizing the fraud solution. For example, agencies can cater a fraud solution that ensures a seamless experience when a citizen is calling a service center, versus an online interaction, versus a face-to-face one. Maintaining a universal view of the user. Achieved by employing a diverse breadth and depth of data assets and applied analytics, this tactic is the core of modern fraud mitigation and identity management. Knowing the individual user extends beyond a traditional 360-degree view. It means having knowledge of a person’s offline and online behavior, not only with your agency, but also with other agencies with which that user has a relationship. Expanding user view through a blended ecosystem. Increasingly, agencies are participating in a blended ecosystem — working with vendors, peer agencies and partners. There exists a collaborative culture in identity and fraud management that doesn’t exist in more competitive commercial environments. Fraudsters easily share information with one another, so those combatting it need to share information as well. Achieving agility and scale using service-based models. More agencies are adopting service-based models that provide greater agility and response to dynamic fraud threats, diverse population changes, and evolving compliance requirements or guidance. Service-based identity proofing provides government agencies the benefit of regularly updated data assets, analytics and expertise in strategy design. These assets are designed to respond to fraud or identity intelligence observed across various markets and industries, often protecting proactively rather than reactively. Future-proofing fraud solution choices. Technical and operational resources are always in relatively short supply compared to demand. Agencies need the ability to “code once” in order to expand and evolve their fraud strategies with ease. Future-proofing solutions must also be combined with an ever-changing set of identity proofing requirements and best practices, powered by a robust and innovative marketplace of service providers. The future of identity proofing in the public sector is more than just verifying individual identities. New standards in digital identity proofing are a responsive result of mass data compromise and failures in legacy techniques. Achieving compliant and confident identity assurance requires a layered approach, flexibly designed and orchestrated to accommodate diverse identity assertions, evidence, and contextual invocation of technologies and data assets. Government must now use risk-based approaches and mitigation strategies to identity threats quickly and determine the type of fraud before damage is done. Download our recent report in which we discuss the primary challenges of identity proofing in the public sector and what modernization of identity proofing looks like.

  Juniper Research recently recognized Experian as a Fraud Detection and Prevention Market Leader in its Online Payment Fraud Whitepaper. Juniper also shared important market insights in the report. The transactional value of card-not-present fraud is estimated to reach $19.3 billion in 2022. Online payment fraud is anticipated to grow 13.7% annually from 2017 to 2022. Digital banking fraud should reach $7.9 billion by 2022. $50.9 billion is expected to be spent on fraud detection and prevention software between 2017 and 2022. Fraud’s not going away anytime soon. Protecting your organization and customers is the new cost of doing business. Don’t wait until 2022 to start protecting yourself. Read the report>

The data to create synthetic identities is available. And the marketplace to exchange and monetize that data is expanding rapidly. The fact that hundreds of millions of names, addresses, dates of birth, and Social Security numbers (SSNs) have been breached in the last year alone, provides an easy path for criminals to surgically target new combinations of data. Armed with an understanding of the actual associations of these personally identifiable information (PII) elements, fraudsters can better navigate the path to perpetrate identity theft, identity manipulation, or synthetic identity fraud schemes on a grand scale. Using information such as birth dates and addresses in combination with Social Security numbers, criminals can target new combinations of data to yield better results with lower risk of detection. Some examples of this would be: identity theft, existing account takeovers, or the deconstruction and reconstruction of those PII elements to better create effective synthetic identities. Experian has continued to evolve and innovate against fraud risks and attacks with an understanding of attack rates, vectors, and the shifting landscape in data availability and security. In doing so, we’ve historically operated under the assumption that all PII is already compromised in some way or is easily done so. Because of this, we employ a layered approach, providing a more holistic view of an identity and the devices that are used over time by that identity. Relying solely on PII to validate and verify an identity is simply unwise and ineffective in this era of data compromise. We strive to continuously cultivate the broadest and most in-depth set of traditional, innovative and alternative data assets available. To do this, we must enable the integration of diverse identity attributes and intelligence to balance risk, while maintaining a positive customer experience. It’s been quite some time since the use of basic PII verification alone has been predictive of identity risk or confidence.  Instead, validation and verification is founded in the ongoing definition and association of identities, the devices commonly used by those individuals, and the historical trends in their behavior. Download our newest White Paper, Synthetic Identities: Getting real with customers, for an in-depth Experian perspective on this increasingly significant fraud risk.

Despite rising concerns about identity theft, most Americans aren’t taking basic steps to make it harder for their information to be stolen, according to a survey Experian conducted in August 2017: Nearly 3 in 4 consumers said they’re very or somewhat concerned their email, financial accounts or social media information could be hacked. This is up from 69% in a similar survey Experian conducted in 2015. Nearly 80% of survey respondents are concerned about using a public Wi-Fi network. Yet, barely half said they take the precaution of using a password-protected Wi-Fi network when using mobile devices. 59% of respondents are annoyed by safety precautions needed to use technology — up 12% from 2015. When your customer’s identity is stolen, it can negatively impact the consumer and your business. Leverage the tools and resources that can help you protect both. Protect your customers and your business>

Synthetic identity fraud is on the rise across financial services, ecommerce, public sector, health and utilities markets. The long-term impact of synthetic identity remains to be seen and will hinge largely upon forthcoming efforts across the identity ecosystem made up of service providers, institutions and agencies, data aggregators and consumers themselves. Making measurement more challenging is the fact that much of the assumed and confirmed losses are associated with credit risk and charge offs, and lack of common and consistent definitions and confirmation criteria. Here are some estimates on the scope of the problem: Losses due to synthetic identity fraud are projected to reach more than $800 million in 2017.* Average loss per account is more than $10,000.* U.S. synthetic credit card fraud is estimated to reach $1.257 billion in 2020.* As with most fraud, there is no miracle cure. But there are best practices, and topping that list is addressing both front- and back-end controls within your organization. Synthetic identity fraud webinar> *Aite Research Group

  Our national survey found that consumers struggle to find a credit card that meets their needs. They say there are too many options and it’s too time-consuming to research. What do consumers want?     With 53% of survey respondents not satisfied with their current cards and 1 in 3 saying they’re likely to get a new card within 6 months, now’s the time to start personalizing offers and growing your portfolio. Start personalizing offers today>

Earlier this week, Javelin Strategy & Research announced its inaugural edition of the 2017 Identity Proofing Platform Awards. We were honored to see CrossCore as the leader – taking the award for the best overall identity proofing platform. According to the report, “Experian’s identity proofing platform is a strong performer in every category of Javelin’s FIT model. It is functional. It is innovative. And, most important, it is tailored toward the advisory’s expectations. The comprehensive nature of CrossCore makes it the market-leading solution for identity proofing.” It’s harder than ever to confidently identify your customers in today’s digital economy. You have lots of vendor solutions to choose from in the identity proofing space. And, now Javelin has made it much easier for you to select the partner that is right for your needs. Javelin’s newly minted Identity Proofing Platform Scorecard assesses current capabilities in the market to help you make that decision. And they have done a lot of the heavy lifting, looking across 23 vendors and scoring them based on three categories of their FIT model – functional, innovative, and tailored. Protecting customers is a priority for you – and for us. Here at Experian, we have a range of capabilities to help businesses manage identity proofing, and our CrossCore platform brings them all together. We launched CrossCore last year, with the goal of making the industry’s fraud and identity solutions work better for everyone. CrossCore delivers a future-proof way to modify strategies quickly, catch fraud faster, improve compliance and enhance the customer experience. We’re proud of the work we’ve done so far, integrating our products as well as adding more than 10 partners to the program. We’re pleased to see so many of our partners included in Javelin’s report. We’re working closely with our clients to pull in more partner capabilities, and further enhance our own platform to create a layered approach that supports a risk-based, adaptable strategy. As highlighted in the Javelin report, a reliance on traditional identity verification approaches are no longer sufficient or appropriate for digital channels. With CrossCore, our clients can choose the capabilities they want, when they want them, to dial in the right confidence level for each and every transaction. This is because CrossCore supports a layered approach to managing risk, allowing companies to connect multiple disparate services through a common access point. We are committed to making it easier for you to protect consumers against fraud. CrossCore is helping us all do just that.