Market Trends

We regularly hear from clients that charge-offs are increasing and they’re struggling to keep up with the credit loss. Many clients use the same debt collection strategy they’ve used for years – when businesses or consumers can’t repay a loan, the creditor or collection agency aggressively contacts them via phone or mail to obtain repayment – never considering the customer experience for the debtor. Our data shows that consumers accounted for $37.24 billion in bankcard charge-offs in Q2 2017, a 17.1 percent increase from Q2 2016. Absorbing credit losses at such a high rate can impact the sustainability of the institution. Clearly the process could use some adjusting. Traditionally, debt collection has been solely about the money. The priority was ensuring that as much of the outstanding debt as possible was repaid. But collecting needs to be about more than that. It also should focus on the customer and his or her individual situation. When it comes to debt collection, customers should not all be treated the same way. I recently shared some tips in Credit Union Business Magazine about how to actively engage and collect from members. The same holds true for other financial institutions – they need to know the difference between a customer who has simply forgotten to make a payment and one who is dealing with financial hardship. As an example, if a person is current on his or her mortgage payment but has slipped behind on his or her credit card payment, that doesn’t necessarily signify financial hardship. It’s an opportunity to work with the customer to manage the debt and get back to current. Modern financial institutions build acquisition and customer management strategies targeted at individuals, so why should the collection process be any different? The challenge is keeping the customer at the center while also managing against potential increases in delinquencies. This holistic approach may be slightly more complex, but technology and analytics will simplify the process and bring about a more engaging experience for customers. The Power of Data and Technology Instead of relying on the same outdated collections approach – which results in uncomfortable exchanges on the phone that don’t ensure repayment –leverage data to your advantage. The data and technology exists to help you make more informed decisions, such as: What’s the most effective communication channel to reach the defaulting customer? When should you contact him or her? How often? The best course of action could be high-touch outreach, but sometimes doing nothing is the right approach. It all depends on the situation. Data and analytics can help uncover which customers are most likely to pay on their own and those who may need a little more help, allowing you to adjust your treatment strategy accordingly. By catering to the preferences of the customer, there’s a greater chance for a positive experience on both sides. The results: less charge-off debt, higher customer satisfaction and a stronger relationship. Explore the Digital Age In 2016, 36 million Americans made some form of mobile payment—paying a bill, purchasing something online, or paying for fast food, or making a Mobile Wallet purchase at a retailer. By 2020, nearly 184 million consumers will have done so, according to Aite. Consumers expect and deserve convenience. In the digital world, financial institutions have an opportunity to provide that expectation and then some. Imagine a customer being able to negotiate and manage his or her past-due account virtually, in the privacy of his or her own home, when it’s most convenient, to set their payment dates and terms. Luckily, the technology exists to make this vision a reality. Customers, not money, need to be at the heart of every debt collections strategy. Gone are the days of mass phone calls to debtors. That strategy made consumers unhappy, embarrassed and resentful. Successful debt collection comes down to a basic philosophy: Treat customers and his or her unique situation individually rather than as a portfolio profile. The creditors who live by that philosophy have an opportunity to reap the rewards on the back-end.

School is nearly back in session. You know what that means? The next wave of college students is taking out their first student loans. It’s a milestone moment – and likely the first trade on the credit file for many of these individuals. According to the College Board, the average cost of tuition and fees for the 2016–2017 school year was $33,480 at private colleges, $9,650 for state residents at public colleges, and $24,930 for out-of-state residents attending public universities. So really, regardless of where students go, the cost of a college education is big. In fact, from January 2006 to July 2016, the Consumer Price Index for college tuition and fees increased 63 percent. So, unless mom and dad did a brilliant job saving, chances are many of today’s students will take on at least some debt to foot the college bill. But it’s not just the young who are consumed by student loan debt. In Experian’s latest State of Student Lending report, we dive into how the $1.4 trillion in student loan debt for Americans is impacting all generations in regards to credit scores, debt load and delinquencies. The document additionally looks at geographical trends, noting which states have the most consumers with student loan debt and which ones have the least. Overall, we discovered 13.4% of U.S. consumers have one or more student loan balances on their credit file with an average total balance of $34k. Additionally, these consumers have an average of 3.7 student loans with 1.2 student loans in deferment. The average VantageScore® credit score for student loan carriers is 650. As we looked across the generations, every group – from the Silents (age 70+) to Gen Z (oldest are between 18 to 20) had some student loan debt. While we can make assumptions that the Silents and Boomers are likely taking out these loans to support the educational pursuits of their children and grandchildren, it can be mixed for Gen X, who might still be paying off their own loans and/or supporting their own kids. Gen X members also reported the largest average student loan total balance at $39,802. Gen Z, the newest members to the credit file, have just started to attend college, thus their generation has the largest percent of student loan balances in deferment at 77%. Their average student loan total balance is also the lowest of all generations at $11,830, but that is to be expected given their young ages. In regards to geographical trends, the Northern states tended to sport the highest average student loan total balances, with consumers in Washington D.C. winning that race with $52.5k.  Southern states, on the other hand, reported higher percentages of consumers with student loan balances 90+ days past due. South Carolina, Louisiana, Mississippi, Arkansas and Texas held the top spots in the delinquency category. Access the complete State of Student Lending report. Data from this report is representative of student loan data on file as of June 2017.

  There’s no shortage of headlines alluding to a student loan crisis. But is there a crisis brewing or is this just a headline grab? Let’s look at the data over the past 4 years to find out. Outstanding student loan (should be loan) debt grew 21%, reaching a high of $1.49 trillion in Q4 2016. Over the past 4 years, student loan trades grew 4%, with a slight decline from 2015 to 2016. Average balance per trade grew 17% to reach $8,210. Number of overall student loan trades per consumer is down 5% to just 3.85. The average person with a student loan balance had just over $32,000 outstanding at the end of 2016 — a rise of 15%. While we’re seeing some increases, the data tells us this is a media headline grab. If students are educated about the debt they’re acquiring and are confident they can repay it, student loan debt shouldn’t be a crippling burden. More student loan insights

  The economic expansion just passed the eight-year mark, and consumer credit defaults across mortgages, bankcards and auto loans are at pre–financial crisis levels. More specifically: The first-mortgage default rate dropped 4 basis points from May to 0.60%. The bankcard default rate experienced its first drop in 9 months, with a decrease of 4 basis points bringing it to 3.49%. Auto loan defaults decreased 3 basis points from the previous month to 0.82%. With inflation at 1% to 2%, debt service levels close to record lows, and disposable income increasing and supporting spending growth, consumers are in good financial shape nationally. Lenders should take this opportunity to review and adjust their acquisition strategies accordingly. Can your originations platform capitalize on this?

1 in 10 Americans are living paycheck to paycheck Financial health means more than just having a great credit score or money in a savings account. It includes being able to manage daily finances, save for the future and weather a financial shock. Here are some facts about Americans’ financial health: 46% of Americans are struggling financially. Roughly 31% of nonretired adults have no retirement savings or pension. Approximately 50% are unprepared for a financial emergency, and about 1 in 5 have no savings set aside to cover unexpected emergencies. It’s never too late for people to achieve financial health. By providing education on money management, you can drive new opportunities for increased engagement, loyalty and long-term revenue streams. Why financial health matters >

School’s out, and graduation brings excitement, anticipation and bills. Oh, boy, here come the student loans. Are graduates ready for the bills? Even before they have a job lined up? With lots of attention from the media, I was interested in analyzing student loan debt to see if this is a true issue or just a headline grab. There’s no shortage of headlines alluding to a student loan crisis: “How student loans are crushing millennial entrepreneurialism” “Student loan debt in 2017: A $1.3 trillion crisis” “Why the student loan crisis is even worse than people think” Certainly sounds like a crisis. However, I’m a data guy, so let’s look at the data. Pulling from our data, I analyzed student loan trades for the last four years starting with outstanding debt — which grew 21 percent since 2013 to reach a high of $1.49 trillion in the fourth quarter of 2016. I then drilled down and looked at just student loan trades. Created with Highstock 5.0.7Total Number of Student Loans TradesStudent Loan Total TradesNumber of trades in millions174,961,380174,961,380182,125,450182,125,450184,229,650184,229,650181,228,130181,228,130Q4 2013Q4 2014Q4 2015Q4 2016025M50M75M100M125M150M175M200MSource: Experian (function(){ function include(script, next) {var sc=document.createElement("script");sc.src = script;sc.type="text/javascript";sc.onload=function() {if (++next < incl.length) include(incl[next], next);};document.head.appendChild(sc);}function each(a, fn){if (typeof a.forEach !== "undefined"){a.forEach(fn);}else{for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++){if (fn) {fn(a[i]);}}}}var inc = {},incl=[]; each(document.querySelectorAll("script"), function(t) {inc[t.src.substr(0, t.src.indexOf("?"))] = 1;});each(Object.keys({"https://code.highcharts.com/stock/highstock.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/adapters/standalone-framework.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/highcharts-more.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/highcharts-3d.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/modules/data.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/modules/exporting.js":1,"http://code.highcharts.com/modules/funnel.js":1,"http://code.highcharts.com/modules/solid-gauge.js":1}),function (k){if (!inc[k]) {incl.push(k)}});if (incl.length > 0) { include(incl[0], 0); } function cl() {if(typeof window["Highcharts"] !== "undefined"){new Highcharts.Chart("highcharts-79eb8e0a-4aa9-404c-bc5f-7da876c38b0f", {"chart":{"type":"column","inverted":true,"polar":false,"style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#333","fontSize":"12px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal"}},"plotOptions":{"series":{"dataLabels":{"enabled":true},"animation":true}},"title":{"text":"Student Loan Total Trades","style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#333333","fontSize":"18px","fontWeight":"bold","fontStyle":"normal","fill":"#333333","width":"792px"}},"subtitle":{"text":"","style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#666666","fontSize":"16px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal","fill":"#666666","width":"792px"}},"exporting":{},"yAxis":[{"title":{"text":"Number of trades in millions","style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#666666","fontSize":"16px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal"}},"labels":{"format":""},"type":"linear"}],"xAxis":[{"title":{"style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#666666","fontSize":"16px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal"},"text":""},"reversed":true,"labels":{"format":"{value:}"},"type":"linear"}],"series":[{"data":[["Total Student Loans",174961380]],"name":"Q4 2013","turboThreshold":0,"_colorIndex":0,"_symbolIndex":0},{"data":[["Total Student Loans",182125450]],"name":"Q4 2014","turboThreshold":0,"_colorIndex":1,"_symbolIndex":1},{"data":[["Total Student Loans",184229650]],"name":"Q4 2015","turboThreshold":0,"_colorIndex":2,"_symbolIndex":2},{"data":[["Total Student Loans",181228130]],"name":"Q4 2016","turboThreshold":0,"_colorIndex":3,"_symbolIndex":3}],"colors":["#26478d","#406eb3","#632678","#982881"],"legend":{"itemStyle":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#333333","fontSize":"12px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal","cursor":"pointer"},"itemHiddenStyle":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#cccccc","fontSize":"18px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal"},"layout":"horizontal","floating":false,"verticalAlign":"bottom","x":0,"align":"center","y":0},"credits":{"text":"Source: Experian"}});}else window.setTimeout(cl, 20);}cl();})(); Over the past four years, student loan trades grew 4 percent, but saw a slight decline between 2015 and 2016. The number of trades isn’t growing as fast as the amount of money that people need. The average balance per trade grew 17 percent to $8,210. Either people are not saving enough for college or the price of school is outpacing the amount people are saving. I shifted the data and looked at the individual consumer rather than the trade level. Created with Highstock 5.0.7Student Loan Average Balance per Trade4.044.043.933.933.893.893.853.85Q4 2013Q4 2014Q4 2015Q4 201600.511.522.533.544.5Source: Experian (function(){ function include(script, next) {var sc=document.createElement("script");sc.src = script;sc.type="text/javascript";sc.onload=function() {if (++next < incl.length) include(incl[next], next);};document.head.appendChild(sc);}function each(a, fn){if (typeof a.forEach !== "undefined"){a.forEach(fn);}else{for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++){if (fn) {fn(a[i]);}}}}var inc = {},incl=[]; each(document.querySelectorAll("script"), function(t) {inc[t.src.substr(0, t.src.indexOf("?"))] = 1;});each(Object.keys({"https://code.highcharts.com/stock/highstock.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/adapters/standalone-framework.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/highcharts-more.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/highcharts-3d.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/modules/data.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/modules/exporting.js":1,"http://code.highcharts.com/modules/funnel.js":1,"http://code.highcharts.com/modules/solid-gauge.js":1}),function (k){if (!inc[k]) {incl.push(k)}});if (incl.length > 0) { include(incl[0], 0); } function cl() {if(typeof window["Highcharts"] !== "undefined"){new Highcharts.Chart("highcharts-66c10c16-1925-40d2-918f-51214e2150cf", {"chart":{"type":"column","polar":false,"style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#333","fontSize":"12px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal"},"inverted":true},"plotOptions":{"series":{"dataLabels":{"enabled":true},"animation":true}},"title":{"text":"Student Loan Average Number of Trades per Consumer","style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#333333","fontSize":"18px","fontWeight":"bold","fontStyle":"normal","fill":"#333333","width":"356px"}},"subtitle":{"text":"","style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#666666","fontSize":"16px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal","fill":"#666666","width":"356px"}},"exporting":{},"yAxis":[{"title":{"text":"","style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#666666","fontSize":"14px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal"}},"type":"linear","labels":{"format":"{value}"}}],"xAxis":[{"title":{"style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#666666","fontSize":"14px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal"}},"type":"linear","labels":{"format":"{}"}}],"colors":["#26478d","#406eb3","#632678","#982881","#ba2f7d"],"series":[{"data":[["Average Trades per Consumer",4.04]],"name":"Q4 2013","turboThreshold":0,"_colorIndex":0},{"data":[["Average Trade per Consumer",3.93]],"name":"Q4 2014","turboThreshold":0,"_colorIndex":1},{"data":[["Average Trade per Consumer",3.89]],"name":"Q4 2015","turboThreshold":0,"_colorIndex":2},{"data":[["Average Trades per Consumer",3.85]],"name":"Q4 2016","turboThreshold":0,"_colorIndex":3}],"legend":{"floating":false,"itemStyle":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#333333","fontSize":"12px","fontWeight":"bold","fontStyle":"normal","cursor":"pointer"},"itemHiddenStyle":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#cccccc","fontSize":"18px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal"},"layout":"horizontal"},"credits":{"text":"Source: Experian"}});}else window.setTimeout(cl, 20);}cl();})(); The number of overall student loan trades per consumer is down to 3.85, a decrease of 5 percent over the last four years. This is explained by an increase in loan consolidations as well as the better planning by students so that they don’t have to take more student loans in the same year. Lastly, I looked at the average balance per consumer. This is the amount that consumers, on average, owe for their student loan trades. Created with Highstock 5.0.7Balance in thousands ($)Quarterly $USD Debt per ConsumerQ4 Student Loan TrendsAverage Student Loan Debt Balance per Consumer27,93427,93429,22629,22630,52330,52332,06132,061Q4 2013Q4 2014Q4 2015Q4 201605,00010,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,000Source: Experian (function(){ function include(script, next) {var sc=document.createElement("script");sc.src = script;sc.type="text/javascript";sc.onload=function() {if (++next < incl.length) include(incl[next], next);};document.head.appendChild(sc);}function each(a, fn){if (typeof a.forEach !== "undefined"){a.forEach(fn);}else{for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++){if (fn) {fn(a[i]);}}}}var inc = {},incl=[]; each(document.querySelectorAll("script"), function(t) {inc[t.src.substr(0, t.src.indexOf("?"))] = 1;});each(Object.keys({"https://code.highcharts.com/stock/highstock.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/adapters/standalone-framework.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/highcharts-more.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/highcharts-3d.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/modules/data.js":1,"https://code.highcharts.com/modules/exporting.js":1,"http://code.highcharts.com/modules/funnel.js":1,"http://code.highcharts.com/modules/solid-gauge.js":1}),function (k){if (!inc[k]) {incl.push(k)}});if (incl.length > 0) { include(incl[0], 0); } function cl() {if(typeof window["Highcharts"] !== "undefined"){Highcharts.setOptions({lang:{"thousandsSep":","}});new Highcharts.Chart("highcharts-0b893a55-8019-4f1a-9ae1-70962e668355", {"chart":{"type":"column","inverted":true,"polar":false,"style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#333","fontSize":"12px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal"}},"plotOptions":{"series":{"dataLabels":{"enabled":true},"animation":true}},"title":{"text":"Average Student Loan Balance per Consumer","style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#333333","fontSize":"18px","fontWeight":"bold","fontStyle":"normal","fill":"#333333","width":"308px"}},"subtitle":{"text":"","style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#666666","fontSize":"16px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal","fill":"#666666","width":"792px"}},"exporting":{},"yAxis":[{"title":{"text":"Balance numbers are in thousands ($)","style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#666666","fontSize":"16px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal"}},"labels":{"format":"{value:,1f}"},"reversed":false}],"xAxis":[{"title":{"style":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#666666","fontSize":"16px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal"},"text":"Balance in thousands ($)"},"labels":{"format":"{value:}"},"type":"linear","reversed":true,"opposite":false}],"series":[{"data":[["Average Balance per Consumer",27934]],"name":"Q4 2013","turboThreshold":0,"_colorIndex":0},{"data":[["Average Balance per Consumer",29226]],"name":"Q4 2014","turboThreshold":0,"_colorIndex":1},{"data":[["Average Balance per Consumer",30523]],"name":"Q4 2015","turboThreshold":0,"_colorIndex":2},{"data":[["Average Balance per Consumer",32061]],"name":"Q4 2016","turboThreshold":0,"_colorIndex":3}],"colors":["#26478d","#406eb3","#632678","#982881"],"legend":{"itemStyle":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#333333","fontSize":"12px","fontWeight":"bold","fontStyle":"normal","cursor":"pointer"},"itemHiddenStyle":{"fontFamily":"Arial","color":"#cccccc","fontSize":"18px","fontWeight":"normal","fontStyle":"normal"}},"lang":{"thousandsSep":","},"credits":{"text":"Source: Experian"}});}else window.setTimeout(cl, 20);}cl();})(); Here we see a growth of 15 percent over the last four years. At the end of 2016, the average person with a student loan balance had just over $32,000 outstanding. While this is a large increase, we should compare it with other purchases: This balance is no more than a person purchasing a brand-new car without a down payment. While we’re seeing an increase in overall outstanding debt and individual loan balances, I’m not yet agreeing that this is the crisis the media portrays. If students are educated about the debt that they’re taking out and making sure that they’re able to repay it, the student loan market is performing as it should. It’s our job to help educate students and their families about making good financial decisions. These discussions need to be had before debt is taken out, so it’s not a shock to the student upon graduation.

There’s a new crew coming of age. Enter Generation Z. Gen Z — those born between the mid-1990s and the early 2000s — makes up one-quarter of the U.S. population. By 2020, they’ll account for 40% of all consumers. The oldest members of this next cohort — 18- to 20-year-olds — are coming of age. Here are some insights on how this initial segment of Gen Z is beginning to use credit. Credit scores averaged 631 in 2016. Debt levels — consisting largely of bankcards and auto and student loans — are low, with an average debt-to-income ratio of just 5.7%. Average income is $33,800. This generation is being raised in an era of instant, always-on access. They expect a quick, seamless and customized mobile experience. You have just 8 seconds to capture their attention. Webinar: A First Look at Gen Z and Credit

The State of Credit Unions 2017 In the financial services universe, there is no shortage of players battling for consumer attention and share of wallet. Here’s a look at how one player — credit unions — has fared over the past two years compared to banks and online lenders: Personal loans grew 2%, but online lenders and finance companies still own 51% of this market. Card originations at credit unions increased 18%, with total credit limits on newly originated cards approaching $100 billion in Q1 2017. Mortgage market share rose 7% for credit unions, while banks lost share to online lenders. Auto originations increased 25% for credit unions to 1.93 million accounts in Q1 2017. Whether your organization is a credit union, a financial institution or an online lender, a “service first” mentality is essential for success in this highly competitive market. The State of Credit Unions 2017

Financial health means more than just having a great credit score or money in a savings account. Although those things are good indicators of financial well-being, personal finance experts believe that financial health means more: being able to manage daily finances, save for the future and weather a financial shock, such as a job loss. As we approach #FinHealthMatters Day on June 27—a day created to bring attention to the 46 percent of Americans who are struggling financially—let’s take a look at financial health trends of Americans. Young adults not actively saving for retirement: Roughly 31% of non-retired adults have no retirement savings or a pension, according to a survey by the Federal Reserve. Nearly half of 18- to 29-year-olds surveyed had no retirement savings or pension, and about 75% of non-retired people 45 and older had some savings. Still, about 14% of adults 60 or older who are not retired and employed had no retirement savings, according to the report. Managing daily finances a challenge for many: Living paycheck to paycheck is a reality for about 1 in 10 Americans (11%), who say they spend more on monthly expenses than their household income allows, according to a Harris Poll. Of those surveyed, about one-third (32%) say they just make ends meet. Most lack an emergency fund: About 50% of people are unprepared for a financial emergency. Nearly 1 in 5 (19%) Americans have no savings set aside to cover unexpected emergencies, while about 1 in 3 (31%) Americans don’t have $500 reserved for an unexpected emergency expense, according to a survey released by HomeServe USA, a home repair service. Renewed focus on personal savings: On a positive note, Americans are sharpening their focus on personal savings, with slight increases among those who say they are saving more than last year (26% in 2017 vs. 24% in 2016). And the portion of those contributing income toward non-retirement savings has returned to its 2013 level of 69%. The good news is it’s never too late for people to achieve financial health. To do so, they need guidance to develop financial routines that build long-term resilience and opportunity. Promoting financial health is good for the financial services industry, as financially healthy consumers drive new opportunities for increased engagement, loyalty, and long-term revenue streams. We invite you to join the conversation and contribute your support and ideas for a healthier future.

Millennials have long been the hot topic over the course of the past few years with researchers, brands and businesses all seeking to understand this large group of people. As they buy homes, start families and try to conquest their hefty student loan burdens, all will be watching. Still, there is a new crew coming of age. Enter Gen Z. It is estimated that they make up ¼ of the U.S. population, and by 2020 they will account for 40% of all consumers. Understanding them will be critical to companies wanting to succeed in the next decade and beyond. The oldest members of this next cohort are between the ages of 18 and 20, and the youngest are still in elementary school. But ultimately, they will be larger than the mystical Millennials, and that means more bodies, more buying power, more to learn. Experian recently took a first look at the oldest members of this generation, seeking to gain insights into how they are beginning to use credit. In regards to credit scores, the eldest Gen Z members sported a VantageScore® credit score of 631 in 2016. By comparison, younger Millennials were at 626 and older Millennials were at 638. Given their young age, Gen Z debt levels are low with an average debt-to-income at just 5.7%. Their tradelines largely consist of bankcards, auto and student loans. Their average income is at $33.8k. Surprisingly, there was a very small group of Gen Z already on file with a mortgage, but this figure was less than .5%. Auto loans were also small, but likely to grow. Of those Gen Z members who have a credit file, an estimated 12% have an auto trade. This is just the beginning, and as they age, their credit files will thicken, and more insights will be gained around how they are managing credit, debt and savings. While they are young today, some studies say they already receive about $17 a week in allowance, equating to about $44 billion annually in purchase power in the U.S. Factor in their influence on parental or household purchases and the number could be closer to $200 billion! For all brands, financial services companies included, it is obvious they will need to engage with this generation in not just a digital manner, but a mobile manner. They are being raised in an era of instant, always-on access. They expect a quick, seamless and customized mobile experience.  Retailers have 8 seconds or less — err on the side of less — to capture their attention. In general, marketers and lenders should consider the following suggestions: Message with authenticity Maintain a long-term vision Connect them with something bigger Provide education for financial literacy and of course Keep up with technological advances. Learn more by accessing our recorded webinar, A First Look at Gen Z and Credit.

The creation of synthetic identities (synthetic id) relies upon an ecosystem of institutions, data aggregators, credit reporting agencies and consumers. All of which are exploited by an online and mobile-driven market, along with an increase in data breaches and dark web sharing. It’s a real and growing problem that’s impacting all markets. With significant focus on new customer acquisition and particular attention being paid to underbanked, emerging, and new-to-country consumers, this poses a large threat to your onboarding and customer management policies, in addition to overall profitability. Synthetic identity fraud is an epidemic that does more than negatively affect portfolio performance. It can hurt your reputation as a trusted organization and expose institutions, like yours, as paths of lesser resistance for fraudsters to use in the creation and farming of synthetic identities. Here is a suggested four-pronged approach to mitigate this type of fraud: The first step is knowing your risk exposure to synthetic identity fraud. Identify how much you could lose or are losing today using a targeted segmentation analysis to examine portfolios or customer populations. Next, review your front- and back-end identity screening operational processes and procedures and analyze that information to ensure you have industry best practices, procedures and verification tools deployed. Then incorporate data, analytics and some of the industry’s cutting edge tools. This enables you to perform targeted consumer authentication and identify opportunities to better capture the majority of fraud and operational waste. Lastly, ensure your organization is part of the solution – not the problem. Analyze your portfolio data quality as reported to credit reporting agencies and then minimize your exposure to negative compliance audit results and reputational risk. Our fraud and identity management consultants can help you reduce synthetic identity fraud losses through a multilayer methodology design that combats the rise in synthetic identity creation and use in fraud schemes.

Subprime vehicle loans When discussing automotive lending, it seems like one term is on everyone’s lips: “subprime auto loan bubble.” But what is the data telling us? Subprime auto lending reached a 10-year record low for Q1. The 30-day delinquency rate dropped 0.5% from Q1 2016 to Q1 2017. Super-prime share of new vehicle loans increased from 27.4% in Q1 2016 to 29.12% in Q1 2017. The truth is, lenders are making rational decisions based on shifts in the market. When delinquencies started going up, the lending industry shifted to more creditworthy customers — average credit scores for both new and used vehicle loans are on the rise. Read more&gt;

When discussing automotive lending, it seems like one term is on everyone’s lips: “subprime auto loan bubble.” There’s always someone who claims that the bubble is bursting. But a level-headed look at the data shows otherwise. According to our Q1 2017 State of the Automotive Finance Market report, 30-day delinquencies dropped and subprime auto lending reached a 10-year record low for Q1. The 30-day delinquency rate dropped from 2.1 percent in Q1 2016 to 1.96 percent in Q1 2017, while the total share of subprime and deep-subprime loans dropped from 26.48 percent in Q1 2016 to 24.1 percent in Q1 2017. The truth is, lenders are making rational decisions based on shifts in the market. When delinquencies started to go up, the lending industry shifted to more creditworthy customers. This is borne out in the rise in customers’ average credit scores for both new and used vehicle loans: The average customer credit score for a new vehicle loan rose from 712 in Q1 2016 to 717 in Q1 2017. The average customer credit score for a used vehicle loan rose from 645 in Q1 2016 to 652 in Q1 2017. In a clear indication that lenders have shifted focus to more creditworthy customers, super prime was the only risk tier to grow for new vehicle loans from Q1 2016 to Q1 2017. Super-prime share moved from 27.4 percent in Q1 2016 to 29.12 percent in Q1 2017. All other risk tiers lost share in the new vehicle loan category: &nbsp; Prime — 43.36 percent, Q1 2016 to 43.04 percent, Q1 2017. Nonprime — 17.83 percent, Q1 2016 to 16.96 percent in Q1 2017. Subprime — 10.64 percent, Q1 2016 to 10.1 percent in Q1 2017. &nbsp; For used vehicle loans, there was a similar upward shift in creditworthiness. Prime and super-prime risk tiers combined for 47.4 percent market share in Q1 2017, up from 43.99 percent in Q1 2017. At the low end of the credit spectrum, subprime and deep-subprime share fell from 34.31 percent in Q1 2016 to 31.27 percent in Q1 2017. &nbsp; The upward shift in used vehicle loan creditworthiness is likely caused by an ample supply of late model used vehicles. Leasing has been on the rise for the past several years (and is at 31.06 percent of all new vehicle financing today). Many of these leased vehicles have come back to the market as low-mileage used vehicles, perfect for CPO programs. &nbsp; Another key indicator of the lease-to-CPO impact is the rise in used vehicle loan share for captives. In Q1 2017, captives had 8.3 percent used vehicle loan share, compared with 7.2 percent in Q1 2016. &nbsp; In other findings: &nbsp; Captives continued to dominate new vehicle loan share, moving from 49.4 percent in Q1 2016 to 53.9 percent in Q1 2017. 60-day delinquencies showed a slight rise, going from 0.61 percent in Q1 2016 to 0.67 percent in Q1 2017. The average new vehicle loan reached a record high: $30,534. The average monthly payment for a new vehicle loan reached a record high: $509. &nbsp; For more information regarding Experian’s insights into the automotive marketplace, visit https://www.experian.com/automotive.

The 1990s brought us a wealth of innovative technology, including the Blackberry, Windows 98, and Nintendo. As much as we loved those inventions, we moved on to enjoy better technology when it became available, and now have smartphones, Windows 10 and Xbox. Similarly, technological and modeling advances have been made in the credit scoring arena, with new software that brings significant benefits to lenders who use them. Later this year, FICO will retire its Score V1, making it mandatory for those lenders still using the old software to find another solution. Now is the time for lenders to take a look at their software and myriad reasons to move to a modern credit score solution. Portfolio Growth As many as 70 million Americans either have no credit score or a thin credit file. One-third of Millennials have never bothered to apply for a credit card, and the percentage of Americans under 35 with credit card debt is at its lowest level in more than 25 years, according to the Federal Reserve. A recent study found that Millennials use cash and debit cards much more than older Americans. Over time, Millennials without credit histories could struggle to get credit. Are there other data sets that provide a window into whether a thin file consumer is creditworthy or not? Modern credit scoring models are now being used in the marketplace without negatively impacting credit quality. For example, the VantageScore® credit score allows for the scoring of 30 million to 35 million more people consumers who are typically unscoreable by other traditional generic credit models. The VantageScore® credit score does this by using a broader, deeper set of credit file data and more advanced modeling techniques. This allows the VantageScore® credit score model to more accurately predict unique consumer behaviors—is the consumer paying his utility bill on time?—and better evaluate thin file consumers. Mitigate Risk In today’s ever-changing regulatory landscape, lenders can stay ahead of the curve by relying on innovative credit score models like the VantageScore® credit score. These models incorporate the best of both worlds by leaning on innovative scoring analytics that are more inclusive, while providing marketplace lenders with assurances the decisioning is both statistically sound and compliant with fair lending laws. Newer solutions also offer enhanced documentation to ease the burden associated with model risk management and regulatory compliance responsibilities. Updated scores Consumer credit scores can vary depending on the type of scoring model a lender uses. If it's an old, outdated version, a consumer might be scored lower. If it's a newer, more advanced model, the consumer has a better shot at being scored more fairly. Moving to a more advanced scoring model can help broaden the base of potential borrowers. By sticking to old models—and older scores—a sizable number of consumers are left at a disadvantage in the form of a higher interest rate, lower loan amount or even a declined application. Introducing advanced scoring models can provide a more accurate picture of a consumer. As an example, for many of the newest consumer risk models, like FICO Score 9, a consumer’s unpaid medical collection agency accounts will be assessed differently from unpaid non-medical collection agency accounts. This isn't true for most pre-2012 consumer risk score versions. Each version contains different nuances for increasing your score, and it’s important to understand what they are. Upgrading your credit score to the latest VantageScore® credit score or FICO solution is easier than you think, with a switch to a modern solution taking no longer than eight weeks and your current business processes still in place. Are you ready to reap the rewards of modern credit scoring?

For an industry that has grown accustomed to sustained year-over-year growth, recent trends are concerning. The automotive industry continued to make progress in the fourth quarter of 2016 as total automotive loan balances grew 8.6% over the previous year and exceeded $1 trillion. However, the positive trend is slowing and 2017 may be the first year since 2009 to see a market contraction. With interest rates on the rise and demand peaking, automotive lending will continue to become more competitive. Lenders can be successful in this environment, but must implement data-driven targeting strategies. Credit Unions Triumph Credit unions experienced the largest year-over-year growth in the fourth quarter of 2016, increasing 15% over the previous period. As lending faces increasing headwinds amid rising rates, credit unions can continue to play a greater role by offering members more competitive rates. For many consumers, a casual weekend trip to the auto mall turns into a big new purchase. Unfortunately, many get caught up in researching the vehicle and don’t think to shop for financing options until they’re in the F&amp;I office. With approximately 25% share of total auto loan balances, credit unions have significant potential to recapture loans of existing members. Successful targeting starts with a review of your portfolio for opportunities with current members who have off-book loans that could be refinanced at a lower rate. After developing a strategy, many credit unions find success targeting these members with refinance offers. Helping members reduce monthly payments and interest expense provides an unexpected service that can deepen loyalty and engagement. But what criteria should you use to identify prospects? Target Receptive Consumers As originations continue to slow, marketing response rates will as well, leading to reduced marketing ROI. Maintaining performance is possible, but requires a proactive approach. Propensity models can help identify consumers who are more likely to respond, while estimated interest rates can provide insight on who is likely to benefit from refinance offers. Propensity models identify who is most likely to open a new trade. By focusing on these populations, you can cut a mail list in half or more while still focusing on the most viable prospects. It may be okay in a booming economy to send as many offers as possible, but as things slow down, getting more targeted can maintain campaign performance while saving resources for other projects. When it comes to recapture, consumers refinance to reduce their payment, interest rate, or both. Payments can often be reduced simply by ‘resetting’ the clock on a loan, or taking the remaining balance and resetting the term. Many consumers, however, will be aware of their current interest rate and only consider offers that reduce the rate as well. Estimated interest rates can provide valuable insight into a consumer’s current terms. By targeting those with high rates, you are more likely to make an offer that will be accepted. Successful targeting means getting the right message to the right consumers. Propensity models help identify “who” to target while estimated interest rates determine “what” to offer. Combining these two strategies will maximize results in even the most challenging markets. Lend Deeper with Trended Data Much of the growth in the auto market has been driven by relatively low-risk consumers, with more than 60% of outstanding balances rated prime and above. This means hypercompetition and great rates for the best consumers, while those in lower risk tiers are underserved. Many lenders are reluctant to compete for these consumers and avoid taking on additional risk for the portfolio. But trended data holds the key to finding consumers who are currently in a lower risk tier but carry significantly less risk than their current score suggests. In fact, historical data can provide much deeper insight on a consumer’s past use of credit. As an example, consider two consumers with the same risk score at a point in time. While they may be judged as carrying similar risk, trended data shows one has taken out two new trades in the past 6 months and has increasing utilization, while the other is consolidating and paying down balances. They may have the same risk score today, but what will the impact be on your future profitability? Most risk scores take a snapshot approach to gauging risk. While effective in general, it misses out on the nuance of consumers who are trending up or down based on recent behavior. Trended data attributes tell a deeper story and allow lenders to find underserved consumers who carry less risk than their current score suggests. Making timely offers to underserved consumers is a great way to grow your portfolio while managing risk. Uncertain Future The automotive industry has been a bright spot for the US economy for several years. It’s difficult to say what will happen in 2017, but there will likely be a continued slowing in originations. When markets get more competitive, data-driven targeting becomes even more important. Propensity models, estimated interest rates, and trended data should be part of every prescreen campaign. Those that integrate them now will likely shrug off any downturn and continue growing their portfolio by providing valuable and timely offers to their members.