Loading...

Regulators Put Spotlight on Marketplace Lenders

Published: November 24, 2015 by Guest Contributor

online marketplace lending-regulatory

Understanding the Impact of New Marketplace Lending Regulations

The online marketplace lending sector has enjoyed unprecedented growth these past few years. According to a recent Morgan Stanley research report, the volume of loans extended by online marketplace lenders in the United States has doubled every year since 2010, hitting $12 billion last year. Some analysts speculate this growth will continue at a compound annual rate of 47 percent through 2020.

The market’s growth, coupled with new, disruptive lending models, is now prompting regulators in Washington to raise questions about the potential opportunities and challenges for consumers, small businesses, and the safety and soundness of our financial system.

Last July, the Treasury Department issued a request for information to better understand the benefits and risks associated with new online lending platforms and other “fin-tech” startups.

The Treasury’s RFI sought information about how these entities’ business models differ from traditional lenders, their impact on financially underserved consumers, and ultimately whether the regulatory framework should evolve to ensure the safe growth of this emerging marketplace. They were also interested in how online lenders were assessing credit risk of borrowers.

Most comments the Treasury Department received from online lenders focused on the positive impact that innovation in financial services could have on consumers and small businesses.

For example, in an open letter to the Treasury, Lending Club Founder and CEO Renaud Laplanche stated his company’s role in “bringing more transparency, removing friction, reducing systemic risk by requiring a match between assets and liabilities, and offering traditional banks … the opportunity to participate on our platform and benefit from the same cost reductions from which our other borrowers and investors benefit.”

Laplanche emphasized the benefits to consumers by noting that “over 70 percent of borrowers on our platform report using their loan to pay off an existing loan or credit card balance and report that the interest rate on their Lending Club loan was an average of seven percentage points lower than they were paying on their outstanding debt or credit cards.”

For small businesses, Laplanche explained how commercial loans less than $250,000 tend to be underserved by traditional lenders. “Bank loans from $100k to $250k have fallen 22 percent since 2007, during a period when bank loans of $1 million or greater increased by 56 percent,” he wrote. “Our platform’s automated processes allow us to provide smaller commercial loans that are less available more economically than traditional banks can.”

Meanwhile, some commenters called for regulators to increase oversight of the marketplace to provide more certainty. In a joint comment letter, the American Bankers Association and Consumer Bankers Association argued that all lenders — regardless of medium by which they deliver loans — should operate under the same rules and standards. They highlighted the numerous consumer protections in place to protect borrowers — from transparency in pricing, to fair debt collection methods,  and data protection — and advocate for these protections to apply in all bank-like activities involving lending or servicing.

But what about the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)? The CFPB will take a leadership role to ensure marketplace lenders comply with the fair lending and consumer financial protection laws that the CFPB has authority to enforce.

The CFPB has not made any direct notice to the online lending marketplace specifically, but it did issue a notice in October 2014 saying it had no intention of bringing enforcement actions against companies that offer innovative financial products — so long as they benefit consumers.

Meanwhile, it is also likely the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general will increase their focus on the online lending segment, especially as it relates to how products and services are marketed.

The FTC held a symposium on Oct. 30 to examine online lead generation and consumer protection in the lending and education industries.  The FTC workshop raised questions about the potential consumer protection challenges of this advertising medium used heavily by online lenders. In particular, there were calls for greater transparency in the use of lead generation, including more information on the ways consumer data is collected through lead-gen websites and how it is used and shared.

Online marketplace lenders should expect to stay under the regulatory spotlight – because that’s what success often brings.  The sector can avoid undue burdens by ensuring compliance with existing laws and adopting and following industry best practices.

For more information, visit www.experian.com/marketplacelending.

Related Posts

Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures are a requirement for banks and other financial institutions to collect and verify the identity of their customers. When a bank verifies the identity of another organization or its owners, the process may be called Know Your Business (KYB) instead.  As part of banks’ anti-money laundering (AML) programs, KYC can help stop corruption, money laundering and terrorist financing. Creating and maintaining KYC programs is also important for regulatory compliance, reputation management and fraud prevention.  READ: How to Build a Know Your Customer Checklist – Everything You Need to Know The three components of KYC programs Banks can largely determine how to set up their KYC and AML programs within the applicable regulatory guidelines. In the United States, KYC needs to happen when banks initially onboard a new customer. But it’s not a one-and-done event—ongoing customer and transaction monitoring is also important.  Customer Identification Program (CIP) Creating a robust Customer Identification Program (CIP) is an essential part of KYC. At a minimum, a bank’s CIP requires it to collect the following information from new customers: Name Date of birth Address Identification number, such as a Social Security number (SSN) or Employer Identification Number (EIN) Banks' CIPs also have to use risk-based procedures to verify customers’ identities and form a reasonable belief that they know the customer's true identity.1 This might involve comparing the information from the application to the customer’s government-issued ID, other identifying documents and authoritative data sources, such as credit bureau databases. Additionally, the bank's CIP will govern how the bank:  Retains the customer’s identifying information Compares customer to government lists  Provides customers with adequate notices Banks can create CIPs that meet all the requirements in various ways, and many use third-party solutions to quickly collect data, detect forged or falsified documents and verify the provided information.  INFOGRAPHIC: Streamlining the Digital Onboarding Process: Beating Fraud at its Game Customer due diligence (CDD)  CIP and CDD overlap, but the CIP primarily verifies a customer’s identity while customer due diligence (CDD) helps banks understand the risk that each customer poses. To do this, banks try to understand what various types of customers do, what those customers’ normal banking activity looks like, and in contrast, what could be unusual or suspicious activity.  Financial institutions can use risk ratings and scores to evaluate customers and then use simplified, standard or enhanced due diligence (EDD) processes based on the results. For example, customers who might pose a greater risk of laundering money or financing terrorism may need to undergo additional screenings and clarify the source of their funds. Ongoing monitoring Ongoing or continuous monitoring of customers’ identities and transactions is also important for staying compliant with AML regulations and stopping fraud.  The monitoring can help banks spot a significant change in the identity of the customer, beneficial owner or account, which may require a new KYC check. Unusual transactions can also be a sign of money laundering or fraud, and they may require the bank to file a suspicious activity report (SAR). Why is KYC important in banking? Understanding and implementing KYC processes can be important for several reasons:  Regulatory compliance: Although the specific laws and rules can vary by country or region, many banks are required to have AML procedures, including KYC. The fines for violating AML regulations can be in the hundreds of millions— a few banks have been fined over $1 billion for lax AML enforcement and sanctions breaching. Reputation management: In some cases, enforcement actions and fines were headline news. Banks that don’t have robust KYC procedures in place risk losing their customers' trust and respect.  Fraud prevention: In addition to the regulatory requirements, KYC policies and systems can also work alongside fraud management solutions for banks. Identity verification at onboarding can help banks identify synthetic identities attempting to open money mule accounts or take out loans. Ongoing monitoring can also be important for identifying long-term fraud schemes and large fraud rings.  ON-DEMAND WEBINAR: Fraud Strategies for a Positive Customer Experience KYC in a digital-first world Many financial institutions have been going through digital transformations. Part of that journey is updating the systems and tools in place to meet the expectations of customers and regulators.  An Experian survey found that about half of consumers (51 percent) consider abandoning the creation of a new account because of friction or a less-than-positive experience — that increased to 69 percent for high-income households.2 The survey wasn’t specific to financial services, but friction could be a problem for banks wanting to attract new account holders. Just as access to additional data sources and machine learning help automate underwriting, financial institutions can use technological advances to add an appropriate amount of friction based on various risk signals. Some of these can be run in the background, such as an electronic Consent Based Social Security Number Verification (eCBSV) check to verify the customer’s name, SSN and date of birth match the Social Security Administration’s records. Others may require more customer involvement, such as taking a selfie that’s then compared to the image on their photo ID — Experian CrossCore® Doc Capture enables this type of verification.  Experian is a leader in identity and data management  Experian's identity verification solutions use proprietary and third-party data to help banks manage their KYC procedures, including identity verification and Customer Identification Programs. By bundling identity verification with fraud assessment, banks can stop fraudsters while quickly resolving identity discrepancies. The automated processes also allow you to offer a low-friction identity verification experience and use step-up authentications as needed.  Learn more about Experian’s identity solutions.  1FDIC (2021). Customer Identification Program 2Experian (2023). Experian's 2023 Identity and Fraud Report

Published: March 21, 2024 by Stefani Wendel

This article was updated on March 7, 2024. Like so many government agencies, the U.S. military is a source of many acronyms. Okay, maybe a few less, but there really is a host of abbreviations and acronyms attached to the military – and in the regulatory and compliance space, that includes SCRA and MLA. So, what is the difference between the two? And what do financial institutions need to know about them? Let’s break it down in this basic Q&A. SCRA and MLA: Who is covered and when are they covered? The Servicemember Civil Relief Act (SCRA) protects service members and their dependents (indirectly) on existing debts when the service member becomes active duty. In contrast, the Military Lending Act (MLA) protects service members, their spouses and/or covered dependents at point of origination if they are on active duty at that time. For example, if a service member opens an account with a financial institution and then becomes active military, SCRA protections will apply. On the other hand, if the service member is of active duty status when the service member or dependent is extended credit, then MLA protections will apply. Both SCRA and MLA protections cease to apply to a credit transaction when the service member ceases to be on active duty status. What is covered? MLA protections apply to all forms of payday loans, vehicle title loans, refund anticipation loans, deposit advance loans, installment loans, unsecured open-end lines of credit, and credit cards. However, MLA protections exclude loans secured by real estate and purchase-money loans, including a loan to finance the purchase of a vehicle. What are the interest rate limitations for SCRA and MLA? The SCRA caps interest rate charges, including late fees and other transaction fees, at 6 percent. The MLA limits interest rates and fees to 36 percent Military Annual Percentage Rate (MAPR). The MAPR is not just the interest rate on the loan, but also includes additional fees and charges including: Credit insurance premiums/fees Debt cancellation contract fees Debt suspension agreement fees and Fees associated with ancillary products. Although closed-end credit MAPR will be a one-time calculation, open-end credit transactions will need to be calculated for each covered billing cycle to affirm lender compliance with interest rate limitations. Are there any lender disclosure requirements? There is only one set of circumstances that triggers SCRA disclosures. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires that SCRA disclosures be provided by mortgage servicers on mortgages at 45 days of delinquency. This disclosure must be provided in written format only. For MLA compliance, financial institutions must provide the following disclosures: MAPR statement Payment obligation descriptions Other applicable Regulation Z disclosures. For MLA, it is also important to note that disclosures are required both orally and in a written format the borrower can keep. How Experian can help Experian's solutions help you comply with the Department of Defense's (DOD's) final amendment rule. We can access the DOD's database on your behalf to identify MLA-covered borrowers and provide a safe harbor for creditors ascertaining whether a consumer is covered by the final rule's protection. Visit us online to learn more about our SCRA and military lending act compliance solutions. Learn more

Published: March 7, 2024 by Sameer Gavankar

Download the ultimate guide for lenders to debunk popular buy now, pay later myths and how BNPL can benefit consumers and lenders.

Published: April 13, 2023 by Kim Le

Subscribe to our blog

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Experian Insights blog

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe