The Threat of Replay Attacks and What It Means for Your Business

by Brian Funicelli 5 min read September 12, 2024

replay attacks

Replay attacks may threaten your customers’ online security

Today, consumer online security is more important than ever. This year, the FTC has already received nearly six million reports of fraud, and 1.4 million of those cases were specifically identity theft.[1] In addition, a recent study reported that losses due to identity fraud amounted to almost $23 billion in 2023.[2] And consumers aren’t the only ones at risk.

According to CyberArk’s global research report, 93% of organizations had two or more identity-related breaches in the past year.[3] This means it’s not only up to consumers to protect themselves against identity theft. It’s also up to businesses to protect themselves and their customers from the threat of fraud.

As security technology advances, so do the tactics of hackers attempting to steal information such as usernames, account numbers, and passwords from innocent online users. One method that hackers use to obtain this information is called a replay attack, which can pose a serious threat to your customers’ online security.

What is a replay attack?

A replay attack is a network-based security hack in which a hacker intercepts legitimate data transmission and then fraudulently repeats it to gain access to a network or system. These attacks are designed to fool the victim into believing the hacker is a genuine user, and they happen in three steps:

  1. Eavesdropping: The hacker listens in on secure network communications, such as information sent through a Virtual Private Network (VPN), to learn about the activity happening on that network.
  1. Interception: The hacker intercepts legitimate user information – usernames, user activity, computer specs, passwords, etc.
  1. Replay: The hacker illegally resends (or “replays”) the valid information they gathered to trick the receiver into thinking that they are a genuine user.

Here’s an example: John transfers funds from one online banking account to another. A hacker illegally captures that transaction message (which is often accompanied by a digital signature or token) and “replays” that same transaction message multiple times to trigger additional fund transfers, all without the genuine user’s knowledge or permission.

The bank doesn’t recognize a problem because the “replayed” transaction messages includes the legitimate digital signature/token, so the bank approves the additional transfers.

Replay attacks aren’t just used for banking transactions. They can be used for various activities, such as:

  • Internet of Things (IoT) device attacks: IoT devices include a multitude of “smart home” devices such as smart plugs, cameras, locks, appliances, speakers, lights, and more. Vulnerabilities in these devices can allow hackers to replicate commands to these devices that seem legitimate, such as turning on cameras, unlocking doors, and disabling security systems.[4]
  • Remote keyless entry systems for vehicles: Most vehicles use a remote key fob to lock and unlock the doors. This key fob usually uses radio waves to send the lock/unlock signal to the car. Hackers can use a device to receive and transmit radio waves near a person’s vehicle that mimic that same lock/unlock signal, and then “replay” that signal to unlock the person’s car themselves.[5]
  • Text-dependent speaker verification: Some people use voice recognition to verify their identity when accessing an account or system. Hackers can record a person’s voice when the person speaks to verify their identity, and then “replay” that voice recording to fraudulently access the account.[6]

How to prevent replay attacks

Replay attacks are dangerous because they are often unnoticed or overlooked until the damage has already been done. Fortunately, there are ways to stop hackers from using replay attacks to access your customers’ personal information.

  1. Device intelligence: By leveraging unique intelligence about the device being used, replay attacks can be thwarted even when fraudsters are using authentic, but stolen, information.
  1. Time stamping: By forcing a timestamp on all sent and received messages, you can prevent hackers from sending repeated messages with legitimate information obtained illegally.
  1. Geolocation review: By identifying suspicious language and/or time zones, you can compare access routes to confirm customers are authentic and secure.

Why it matters for your business

Consumers in the U.S. value network security more than ever, with 70% rating security a top priority, even over personalization and convenience.[7] People want to feel safe online, and if they experience a threat of identity theft or fraud, they’ll need to find a reliable resource to keep their personal information secure.

Successful replay attacks allow fraudsters to impersonate real users and potentially gain partial or full access to their personal online accounts. If your customers fall victim to these kinds of attacks, the resulting stress may have a negative impact on your relationship with them.

With our fraud management solutions, your business can strengthen your customers’ trust and security by leveraging highly trained fraud analysts to help uncover suspicious activity that might not be noticed otherwise.

  • Lower fraud losses and achieve fraud capture rates that exceed industry averages.
  • Protect your customers by using a covert, frictionless solution the reduces false positives.
  • Improve operational efficiency by prioritizing resources across the board.

Protect your consumers with powerful fraud management solutions

63% of consumers say it’s important for businesses to be able to recognize them online, and 81% say they are more trusting of businesses that can accomplish easy and accurate identification.[8] While replay attacks can cause consumers stress and anxiety, taking action to prevent them can fortify a strong, trusting relationship between your business and your customers.

Protect your customers and prevent replay attacks with our powerful fraud management solutions.

[1] IdentityTheft.org, 2024 Identity Theft Facts and Statistics.

[2] Javelin, 2024 Identity Fraud Study: Resolving the Shattered Identity Crisis.

[3] CyberArk, Report: 93% of Organizations Had Two or More Identity-Related Breaches in the Past Year, May 2024.

[4] Hackster.io, IoT Devices May Be Susceptible to Replay Attacks with a Raspberry Pi and RTL-SDR Dongle, 2017.

[5] Automotive World, How to mitigate vulnerabilities in keyless entry systems, 2023.

[6] Antispoofing, Audio Replay Attacks and Countermeasures Against Them, 2022.

[7] 2018 Experian® Global Fraud Report

[8] Experian® 2024 Identity and Fraud Report Highlights Evolving Fraud Landscape

This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.

Related Posts

Who’s Driving What? How Fuel Loyalty and Generational Preferences are Shaping the Vehicle Market

Take a look around at any road, parking lot, or highway, and you’ll see just how diverse today’s vehicle landscape has become. Within that evolving mix, electric vehicles (EVs) have seen years of rapid growth, and while the market is seemingly entering a new phase, interest remains. So, with several vehicles and fuel types to choose from, what keeps drivers coming back to electrified vehicles? Experian Automotive’s Automotive Market Trends Report: Q2 2026 found that among EV owners who returned to the market in the last 12 months, majority (72.2%) replaced their EV with another EV, while 18.5% switched to a gasoline vehicle. Hybrid buyers also showed considerable loyalty to electrification, with 55.7% of gas-hybrid owners staying with the same fuel type when replacing their vehicle, and 32.7% swapping for a gasoline vehicle. Consumers are seemingly remaining loyal to EVs and hybrids because they are attracted to the benefits that fit their everyday lifestyle, such as lower fuel or charging costs amid the elevated gas prices. For some, it could also be tied to convenience, as drivers who have found a reliable charging routine or appreciate the efficiency of a hybrid may have little reason to switch back to a traditional gasoline vehicle. Generations are taking different paths to electrification Generational differences also influence hybrid and EV loyalty, with younger consumers generally showing greater openness to alternative fuel types. While older generations tend to have greater familiarity with traditional gasoline vehicles, hybrid and EV adoption is increasing across all age groups as these options become more accessible and mainstream. Millennials, in particular, showed the strongest inclination toward electrified vehicles. Through Q2 2026, they accounted for the highest EV share at 8.2%, compared with Gen X at 5.5%, Gen Z (4.7%), and Baby Boomers (4.7%). The difference becomes even more pronounced when hybrids are in the mix, as 23.1% of Millennial registrations were gas-electric hybrids or plug-in hybrids, versus 16.7% for Gen X, 16.8% for Gen Z, and 18.0% for Baby Boomers. For automotive professionals, these differences make understanding who is driving what, and what they may choose next, increasingly important. The future of the automotive market may be less about consumers choosing one vehicle type over the other and more about understanding the distinct patterns and preferences of each generation. As the market continues to evolve, those insights can help automotive professionals better meet consumers where they are. To learn more about vehicle market trends, view the full Automotive Market Trends Report: Q2 2026 presentation on demand.

September 24, 2026 by John Howard
New Data Available for MBS Investors: Current Credit Score 

In a previous post, we described how every mortgage borrower’s financial situation and credit profile evolve over time.  After a borrower opens a loan, their financial status evolves—jobs are gained and lost; incomes can rise or fall, and financially stressful situations or windfalls can occur. These effects are often reflected in the consumer’s evolving credit score, which changes with the consumer’s payment behavior on open loans, credit inquiry activity, credit card utilization, and other revolving lines, among other things.    Even though MBS, whole loan, and MSR investors ultimately bear borrower credit risk, they may have access to less current borrower credit information than other participants in the mortgage ecosystem.   In securitized markets (both agency MBS and private-label MBS), updated scores are not provided in disclosure to bondholders, even as loans age year over year.  In whole loan and MSR markets, a single origination credit score is often provided at the time of bid, and after a successful bid, the investor may have a permissible purpose to pull individual scores on an owned portfolio. But until recently, there was no single loan-level dataset that included continuously refreshed credit scores across the U.S. mortgage market—the type of foundational dataset needed to build and tune credit and prepayment models.  A monthly-refreshed Current Credit Score field meets our three-pronged materiality standard for new data delivery to MBS markets:  New: Provides information not available in existing datasets (i.e., orthogonal to currently available data). Neither private-label MBS nor agency MBS standard market data includes a monthly-refreshed borrower credit score.  Material: Impacts a sizeable portion of the MBS universe. For the vast majority of loans in MBS, borrowers credit scores are available.  Significant: Differentiates collateral performance by a large enough margin to influence trading and risk management decisions.  A current credit score wraps all of a borrower’s credit-related behaviors into a single numerical value and has historically been associated with a borrower’s likelihood of becoming 60+ days past due on any obligation within the subsequent 24 months.    In fact, a current credit score is among the most informative indicators of near-term mortgage default risk, as shown in the image below, which depicts 30+ DPD rates by current credit score bands for the entire U.S. mortgage market, controlling for origination score <=650.    Without access to current credit scores, investors are limited to the score at origination—causing the four distinct performance trends shown here to appear as a single averaged line. In reality, score migration since origination reveals significant divergence in credit risk, with the lowest current-score bucket exhibiting a nearly 10 times higher 30+ DPD rate than the highest-score bucket in the latest period shown.  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset hosted on IVolatility DataDriven Platform  In this article, we’ll take a quick look at how score migration acts as an early predictor of a performing loan’s first roll into 30-day delinquent status.    MBS Investors’ Current Credit Score Blindspot: Solved   An MBS investor relying on standard market data and securitization remittance reports sees no sign of borrower stress until the subject mortgage loan in the securitization misses a payment and is reported at 30 days delinquent. Of course, in the vast majority of cases, a borrower begins struggling financially well before missing a mortgage payment:  The borrower may miss payments on other types of loans (credit card, auto loan, personal unsecured, or payday loans) as they prioritize their home and mortgage.  Outstanding balances on credit cards may grow as the borrower begins to make only minimum payments on revolvers.  The borrower may apply for additional credit cards, personal or payday loans   The borrower may apply to increase limits on existing credit cards as outstanding balance nears spending limit  All these stress-indicative behaviors result in a decreasing credit score, many months before the borrower misses their first mortgage payment. An MBS investor with access to each borrower’s current credit score, refreshed each month, can predict increased likelihood of default many months before the first missed mortgage payment—and is therefore at a major information advantage relative to the market generally.  Experian’s Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset contains thousands of fields describing mortgage performance from each borrower, loan, and property perspective, all refreshed monthly (including, amongst other things, new credit scores and refinance inquiry activity, loan performance on all types of debt, filed junior liens, and AVM values).   MLP is much more comprehensive than loan-level data provided by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Ginnie Mae, and PLS data vendors in several ways:   Standard market datasets may not contain certain data elements that some market participants consider useful when evaluating mortgage prepayment or credit performance. Basic, critical fields such as the borrower’s current credit score and the current junior lien balance on the property are missing.    MLP contains borrower, loan, and property data fields spanning a broad portion of the mortgage universe, including Agency, Non-Agency, and Esoteric mortgage products (CES, HELOC, Reverse), including both securitized and non-securitized loans.   MLP enables full three-dimensional (borrower + loan + property) tracking with persistent keys for borrower (before and after refinancing), loan (in securities/deals even after exit due to payoffs or buyouts, including before and after MSR sales), and property.  This enables end-to-end analysis of each borrower’s (and property’s) mortgage experience throughout their credit lifecycle.  Is Downward-Trending Credit Score a Signal for Impending Delinquency?  MLP contains thousands of fields describing each loan, borrower, and property across all U.S. mortgages.  It allows for virtually unlimited segmentation and granular analysis.   For purposes of this illustrative article, we’ll take a high-level look at the entire U.S. mortgage market and perform a quick analysis to confirm intuition that a declining credit score provides a signal for higher likelihood of near-term mortgage delinquency.  Figure 1 illustrates the current pay status (as of 6/30) for the entire U.S. mortgage market, as contained in the MLP dataset, along with count, UPB and UPB-weighted Vantage 4.0 credit score for each bucket.  Figure 1  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance dataset  As illustrated in Figure 1, approximately 772,000 individual mortgage loans were reported to Experian as 30 days delinquent as of 6/30/2026.  Of the 772,000 30d delinquent loans in the June snapshot, approximately 426,000 were current in the prior (May) snapshot.  Some of these 426,000 loans were reperformers which had been bouncing from 30 DPD to current over the prior few snapshots. To remove reperformance score noise, we further parsed out the population which: 1) had rolled from current to 30 DPD from May to June; and 2) was consistently current for a full year prior to the 6/30 missed payment.  The population meeting both conditions totaled approximately 123,000 loans.  Figure 2 below shows, for this population of 123,000 “clean current” loans, the UPB-weighted average Vantage4 credit score for each of the 12 months leading up to the June missed payment, as well as the impact of the missed payment on the 6/30 score.  Figure 2  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset  Figure 2 reveals a rather slow and steady ~20-point deterioration of score in the 12 months prior to first missed payment – as well as the 80-point drop once the missed payment hits.  When we compare this cohort’s Vantage 4.0 score trend to the broader Current population across the entire dataset in Figure 3, we see a marked difference in both absolute value and trend:  Figure 3  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset  Not only is the cohort’s starting Vantage 4.0 score lower than the broader current population, but it also displays a dropping trend (with a notable 2 to 3x acceleration in monthly score drop the month before the first missed mortgage payment) while the broader Current population’s score (of which the isolated cohort is a subset) remains rock steady.  Lastly, we present Figure 4, a histogram comparing the distribution of at-origination and as-of 5/30 (i.e., the period just before the missed June mortgage payment) credit scores for the clean current population. The distribution appears to shift toward lower credit scores. To the extent credit scores are correlated with credit risk, this shift may indicate elevated credit risk relative to origination. Since this degradation occurs during a period of perfect mortgage pay performance, it is invisible to MBS investors who lack access to current borrower credit scores. Experian MLP provides monthly refreshed credit scores for mortgage borrowers contained within the MLP database.  Figure 4  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset 

September 22, 2026 by Michael Pyatski, Perry DeFelice
Ask the Expert: The Future of Lending Starts With Identity With Shawn Rife and Brian Cardona

Identity intelligence and alternative data can help lenders validate consumers and support more informed decisions across the customer lifecycle.

September 16, 2026 by Julie Lee

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe