Loading...

Survey: Most Companies Ill-Prepared for a Global Data Breach

Published: June 27, 2017 by Michael Bruemmer

Most companies aren’t prepared to respond to a global data breach, and aren’t yet ready to comply with the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), even though it takes effect in less than a year, according to the latest Ponemon Institute report sponsored by Experian® Data Breach Resolution.

Nearly a third of the 588 information security and compliance professionals interviewed for the survey said their organizations had no global incident response plan in place, and 38 percent have a single plan that’s applied around the world. Just 27 percent reported having separate plans at the country or regional level, but even those who had a plan weren’t confident about its efficacy.

The global scope of data breaches

The number of data breaches reached a record high in 2016 — 4,149 incidents in 102 countries around the world exposed more than 4.2 billion records, according to cybersecurity company Risk Based Security. Ponemon’s survey underscores the scope of global data breaches; 51 percent of respondents reported their companies experienced a global data breach in the past five years, and 56 percent of breached companies had more than one incident.

When the GDPR goes into effect in May 2018, any company that processes and/or holds the personal data of European Union consumers will be required to comply with the regulation, regardless of where the company is located. Failure to comply can lead to fines ranging from 2 percent to 4 percent of a company’s annual global turnover.

Despite the escalating risks of falling victim to a global data breach and the possible repercussions of not complying with the GDPR, Ponemon’s survey shows a widespread lack of preparedness among companies.

Levels of unpreparedness

When it comes to preventing and responding to a global data breach, and ensuring they comply with the GDPR’s strict notification rules, many survey respondents expressed significant shortfalls in preparedness:

  • Outdated and inadequate security solutions would hinder the ability of 49 percent to cope with a global data breach.
  • Just 40 percent of respondents felt confident their organizations’ security technologies would adequately protect information assets and IT infrastructures overseas, and only 39 percent said they had the right policies and procedures to do so.
  • Slightly more than a third thought their companies could successfully manage cultural differences and privacy and data security expectations in different areas of the world.

A majority of respondents (89 percent) predicted the GDPR will significantly affect their data protection practices, and 69 percent felt non-compliance would hinder their companies’ ability to do business globally. Yet only a quarter said their companies were ready to comply with the new regulation.

While most understand GDPR is something they need to worry about, many aren’t sure what to do. The survey reveals some companies may be feeling desperate enough about the looming regulation to take drastic measures; 34 percent said their preparations include closing operations in countries with high non-compliance rates.

Timely notification of regulators and EU citizens affected by a data breach is a key component of the GDPR, yet the majority of our survey respondents (69 percent) said they would have trouble meeting the time limitations. The GDPR requires breached companies to notify regulators within 72 hours of discovering a breach, and affected consumers “without undue delay.” Half of our survey respondents said they experienced a global breach that required notification of victims. Only 10 percent were able to do so within the GDPR’s 72-hour window; 38 percent reported notification took two to five months to complete.

Obstacles to preparedness

The years-long evolution of the GDPR, which will replace older regulations, is evidence that world governments are taking data breach risks seriously. Unfortunately, our study indicates not all C-suite decision-makers are as concerned about global data breach risks as they should be and their antipathy is impairing their organizations’ ability to prepare for a global data breach.

While the security professionals surveyed cited high-volume breaches (65 percent) and breaches involving high-value information (50 percent) as the data risks that concern them the most, only 30 percent said their organization’s C-suite was fully aware of the company’s compliance status. Further, just 38 percent said their executives viewed global data regulations as a top priority.

Technology limitations and lack of executive support are significant obstacles to preparedness and compliance, but they’re not the only ones. Additionally, survey respondents cited:

  • Reluctance to make needed comprehensive changes in business practices (60 percent)
  • Not enough budget to hire staff (37 percent)
  • Unrealistic demands from regulators/regulations (35 percent)
  • Not enough money for appropriate security technology (34 percent)
  • Lack of knowledge about global data breach response (29 percent)

What companies must do

Some survey respondents indicated their organizations are taking the right steps toward preparedness and compliance. They are putting in place security technologies to quickly detect a data breach (48 percent), have tested and proven response plans (44 percent), can quickly identify whether a breach will require notification (15 percent) and are prepared to notify regulators within 72 hours of breach discovery (13 percent).

However, many organizations could be doing more to prepare for a global data breach and to comply with the GDPR. Global data breach risks continue to increase in number, scope and impact, and the potential loss of business and financial impact of a breach could prove catastrophic for affected companies. With less than a year to go until the GDPR takes effect, any company that conducts business internationally needs to act now to ensure it will be ready to deal with a global data breach when it occurs.

Related Posts

Fake IDs have been around for decades, but today’s fraudsters aren’t just printing counterfeit driver’s licenses — they’re using artificial intelligence (AI) to create synthetic identities. These AI fake IDs bypass traditional security checks, making it harder for businesses to distinguish real customers from fraudsters. To stay ahead, organizations need to rethink their fraud prevention solutions and invest in advanced tools to stop bad actors before they gain access. The growing threat of AI Fake IDs   AI-generated IDs aren’t just a problem for bars and nightclubs; they’re a serious risk across industries. Fraudsters use AI to generate high-quality fake government-issued IDs, complete with real-looking holograms and barcodes. These fake IDs can be used to commit financial fraud, apply for loans or even launder money. Emerging services like OnlyFake are making AI-generated fake IDs accessible. For $15, users can generate realistic government-issued IDs that can bypass identity verification checks, including Know Your Customer (KYC) processes on major cryptocurrency exchanges.1 Who’s at risk? AI-driven identity fraud is a growing problem for: Financial services – Fraudsters use AI-generated IDs to open bank accounts, apply for loans and commit credit card fraud. Without strong identity verification and fraud detection, banks may unknowingly approve fraudulent applications. E-commerce and retail – Fake accounts enable fraudsters to make unauthorized purchases, exploit return policies and commit chargeback fraud. Businesses relying on outdated identity verification methods are especially vulnerable. Healthcare and insurance – Fraudsters use fake identities to access medical services, prescription drugs or insurance benefits, creating both financial and compliance risks. The rise of synthetic ID fraud Fraudsters don’t just stop at creating fake IDs — they take it a step further by combining real and fake information to create entirely new identities. This is known as synthetic ID fraud, a rapidly growing threat in the digital economy. Unlike traditional identity theft, where a criminal steals an existing person’s information, synthetic identity fraud involves fabricating an identity that has no real-world counterpart. This makes detection more difficult, as there’s no individual to report fraudulent activity. Without strong synthetic fraud detection measures in place, businesses may unknowingly approve loans, credit cards or accounts for these fake identities. The deepfake threat AI-powered fraud isn’t limited to generating fake physical IDs. Fraudsters are also using deepfake technology to impersonate real people. With advanced AI, they can create hyper-realistic photos, videos and voice recordings to bypass facial recognition and biometric verification. For businesses relying on ID document scans and video verification, this can be a serious problem. Fraudsters can: Use AI-generated faces to create entirely fake identities that appear legitimate Manipulate real customer videos to pass live identity checks Clone voices to trick call centers and voice authentication systems As deepfake technology improves, businesses need fraud prevention solutions that go beyond traditional ID verification. AI-powered synthetic fraud detection can analyze biometric inconsistencies, detect signs of image manipulation and flag suspicious behavior. How businesses can combat AI fake ID fraud Stopping AI-powered fraud requires more than just traditional ID checks. Businesses need to upgrade their fraud defenses with identity solutions that use multidimensional data, advanced analytics and machine learning to verify identities in real time. Here’s how: Leverage AI-powered fraud detection – The same AI capabilities that fraudsters use can also be used against them. Identity verification systems powered by machine learning can detect anomalies in ID documents, biometrics and user behavior. Implement robust KYC solutions – KYC protocols help businesses verify customer identities more accurately. Enhanced KYC solutions use multi-layered authentication methods to detect fraudulent applications before they’re approved. Adopt real-time fraud prevention solutions – Businesses should invest in fraud prevention solutions that analyze transaction patterns and device intelligence to flag suspicious activity. Strengthen synthetic identity fraud detection – Detecting synthetic identities requires a combination of behavioral analytics, document verification and cross-industry data matching. Advanced synthetic fraud detection tools can help businesses identify and block synthetic identities. Stay ahead of AI fraudsters AI-generated fake IDs and synthetic identities are evolving, but businesses don’t have to be caught off guard. By investing in identity solutions that leverage AI-driven fraud detection, businesses can protect themselves from costly fraud schemes while ensuring a seamless experience for legitimate customers. At Experian, we combine cutting-edge fraud prevention, KYC and authentication solutions to help businesses detect and prevent AI-generated fake ID and synthetic ID fraud before they cause damage. Our advanced analytics, machine learning models and real-time data insights provide the intelligence businesses need to outsmart fraudsters. Learn more *This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information. 1 https://www.404media.co/inside-the-underground-site-where-ai-neural-networks-churns-out-fake-ids-onlyfake/

Published: March 20, 2025 by Julie Lee

Financial institutions can help protect clients by educating them on the warning signs of fraudulent lottery scams.

Published: March 12, 2025 by Alex Lvoff

Fraud rings cause an estimated $5 trillion in financial damages every year, making them one of the most dangerous threats facing today’s businesses. They’re organized, sophisticated and only growing more powerful with the advent of Generative AI (GenAI). Armed with advanced tools and an array of tried-and-true attack strategies, fraud rings have perfected the art of flying under the radar and circumventing traditional fraud detection tools. Their ability to adapt and innovate means they can identify and exploit vulnerabilities in businesses' fraud stacks; if you don’t know how fraud rings work and the right signs to look for, you may not be able to catch a fraud ring attack until it’s too late. What is a fraud ring? A fraud ring is an organized group of cybercriminals who collaborate to execute large-scale, coordinated attacks on one or more targets. These highly sophisticated groups leverage advanced techniques and technologies to breach fraud defenses and exploit vulnerabilities. In the past, they were primarily humans working scripts at scale; but with GenAI they’re increasingly mobilizing highly sophisticated bots as part of (or the entirety of) the attack. Fraud ring attacks are rarely isolated incidents. Typically, these groups will target the same victim multiple times, leveraging insights gained from previous attack attempts to refine and enhance their strategies. This iterative approach enables them to adapt to new controls and increase their impact with each subsequent attack. The impacts of fraud ring attacks far exceed those of an individual fraudster, incurring significant financial losses, interrupting operations and compromising sensitive data. Understanding the keys to spotting fraud rings is crucial for crafting effective defenses to stop them. Uncovering fraud rings There’s no single tell-tale sign of a fraud ring. These groups are too agile and adaptive to be defined by one trait. However, all fraud rings — whether it be an identity fraud ring, coordinated scam effort, or large-scale ATO fraud scheme — share common traits that produce warning signs of imminent attacks. First and foremost, fraud rings are focused on efficiency. They work quickly, aiming to cause as much damage as possible. If the fraud ring’s goal is to open fraudulent accounts, you won’t see a fraud ring member taking their time to input stolen data on an application; instead, they’ll likely copy and paste data from a spreadsheet or rely on fraud bots to execute the task. Typically, the larger the fraud ring attack, the more complex it is. The biggest fraud rings leverage a variety of tools and strategies to keep fraud teams on their heels and bypass traditional fraud defenses. Fraud rings often test strategies before launching a full-scale attack. This can look like a small “probe” preceding a larger attack, or a mass drop-off after fraudsters have gathered the information they needed from their testing phase. Fraud ring detection with behavioral analytics Behavioral analytics in fraud detection uncovers third-party fraud, from large-scale fraud ring operations and sophisticated bot attacks to individualized scams. By analyzing user behavior, organizations can effectively detect and mitigate these threats. With behavioral analytics, businesses have a new layer of fraud ring detection that doesn’t exist elsewhere in their fraud stack. At a crowd level, behavioral analytics reveals spikes in risky behavior, including fraud ring testing probes, that may indicate a forthcoming fraud ring attack, but would typically be hidden by sheer volume or disregarded as normal traffic. Behavioral analytics also identifies the high-efficiency techniques that fraud rings use, including copy/paste or “chunking” behaviors, or the use of advanced fraud bots designed to mimic human behavior. Learn more about our behavioral analytics solutions and their fraud ring detection capabilities. Learn more

Published: February 27, 2025 by Presten Swenson