Tag: debt collection

Ben Franklin was wrong. Death and taxes are not the only two constants in life. For many, debt makes a third. And where there is past-due debt, collections is not far from the conversation, if not included in the same breath. While the turn of the new year may mark some arduous work to be done – losing those holiday pounds, spring cleaning, balance transfers and tax filings – there’s also opportunity for lenders, collectors and consumers alike. Just as the spikes in retail trends are analogous with the holiday months, there’s an evident uptick in collections during tax season year after year. As such, successful lenders, financial institutions and collections agencies know that January, February and March are critical months to engage with past-due customers, specifically as they relate to the tax season. The average tax refund for 2016 and 2017 was $2,860 and $2,769 respectively, according to the IRS. And while some may assume that all consumers look at this money as an opportunity for a “treat yourself” splurge, 35% of consumers expecting a refund said they would use it to pay down debt, according to the National Retail Federation. Additionally, during the 2017 tax season, 45 million consumers paid at least $500 and 10% or more of a tradeline balance(s), according to Experian data. So, if past-due consumers want to pay down debt, and the ultimate goal of collections is to recoup over-due funds, and first quarter collections growth appears to be driven by tax refunds, how do we make the connection? Think of the scene from Jerry Maguire – “Help me, help you!” Help consumers help themselves. Experian’s new Tax Season Payment IndicatorTM examines payment behavior over the past two years to determine whether a consumer has made a large payment to a tradeline balance – or balances – during tax season. “Millions of consumers used their tax refunds to pay down debt and many plan to do it again,” said Denise McKendall, Product Manager. “Collectors that leverage previous tax season payment behavior to identify and strategically engage with this group will benefit the most from the tax refund season.” Engaging this information can be like having a collections crystal ball. Targeting consumers that are likely to use their refund to pay down debt can influence messaging, campaign refinement and the timeliness of your touchpoints, resulting in greater collections ROI. This means as the year closes out and planning begins for 2019, collections prioritization strategy is key. And those conversations should be taking place now. Are you tax season ready? Learn More About Tax Season Payment Indicator

There are lots of reasons why people miss a bill payment. Unfortunately, the approaches for collecting those late payments tend to follow a one-size-fits-all approach. For example, a customer takes a long vacation and forgets to pay his credit card bill before he leaves. When he gets home ten days later he already has five phone calls and two official notices from the collections department. And the calls continue for the next few days until he has an opportunity to call them back to take care of the situation. How does this customer feel? Frustrated? Annoyed? Under-valued? The current collections process is outdated, especially in a world where personalized and relevant communications are becoming the norm. The collections process is driven by the measurement of delinquency and loss. Rarely does it consider the broader customer profile. Too often, this narrow view leads to one-size-fits all collections strategies and overly aggressive processes. Getting debt collection right is about more than the money. It needs to be about the customer. It’s about knowing the difference between a customer who has simply forgotten to make a payment or someone dealing with financial hardship. We recently released a paper on the collections process, looking at how common it is for overly aggressive collections to lead to account closures and erosion of customer lifetime value. In fact, we found 3 percent of 30-day delinquencies in card portfolios closed their accounts after paying their balance in full. Seventy-five percent of those closures came with the payment to bring the account current and the remaining 25 percent closed the account within the following 60 days. Our analysis also showed that people with the lowest balances and the lowest amount past-due had the highest incidence of paying off their debt and closing their accounts. That means that by being too aggressive over a fairly low dollar amount, you can damage the relationship with a customer who could bring a lifetime of more business. We also used our Mosaic® lifestyle segmentation system to do a deeper look into who was more likely to close their accounts. We found the likelihood to close accounts was four times higher in the young, urban, affluent population than it was with others. This particular segment usually has the greatest potential for lifetime value and are the hardest to attract. It seems counterproductive to let overly aggressive and perhaps unnecessary, debt collection end the relationship. However, if we become smarter about the collections process, it could be possible to not only keep the customer, but also strengthen the relationship. Consider this, the customer on that long vacation receives an email that says, “Hey we noticed you forgot to make your last payment. Can you email us back the reason why and when we should expect it?” This creates an opportunity to build the relationship with that customer and get a commitment to settle the payment by a particular date. Ten days later when he gets back from vacation, he receives a reminder to make the payment and takes care of it.  Instead of feeling frustrated, annoyed or undervalued, the customer has a positive experience and continues doing business with a company who is focused on building relationships vs. simply collecting money. There is a real opportunity to take best practices around customer experience from earlier stages of the customer lifecycle and apply them to the collections stage. Sure, some situations may require a more aggressive approach, for others, the idea of an email and the option to log on to a virtual platform to handle the debt on their own terms is the preferred approach. Some customers may not need options other than a little more time to pay on their own terms.  It comes down to knowing your customer and applying the insights we can uncover from data to handle debt collection. This will allow us to improve the customer experience and strengthen customer life-time value.

It’s no secret. Consumers engage and interact with brands through a variety of channels, including email, direct mail, websites and mobile. And since most organizations work to keep the consumer experience at the core, they tend to invest in an omnichannel approach that caters to the consumer’s preferences. The lone exception may be during the collections process. Often, once an account falls behind on payment, the consumer experience falls behind with it. But should it? While many banks and financial institutions view the collections process merely as an opportunity to collect outstanding debt, the potential is much more. If treated effectively, the collections process can present an opportunity to develop a positive customer relationship that builds loyalty over time. If handled poorly, the collections process could cost an organization a number of lifetime customers. To correct this, banks and financial institutions need to implement the same omnichannel approach in the collections process as they do with every other consumer interaction. Collections can no longer be treated as a linear process that leads from one channel to the next. There needs to be a more personalized touch — communicating with consumers through preferred channels, contacting them at the most opportune times. Sound complex? Sure. But consider a recent Experian analysis that invited consumers to establish a nonthreatening dialogue with an online debt recovery system. The analysis revealed 21 percent of visits to an organization’s website were outside the traditional working hours of 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Furthermore, of the consumers who committed to a repayment plan, only 56 percent did so in a single visit. Each consumer is different. So is each situation. And banks and financial institutions need to acknowledge those differences. Luckily, technology can address the complexities of an omnichannel and personalized approach. Platforms such as Experian’s PowerCurve® Collections enable banks and financial institutions to simplify the collections process for both the consumer and the organization. By treating the collections process the same as any other stage in the consumer journey, organizations have an opportunity to build a relationship. And to do so, banks and financial institutions need to leverage the data and technology at their disposal. If they do so appropriately, they’ll minimize their charge-offs and also create a lifetime customer. To learn more about leveraging the collections process to build customer loyalty, download our white paper Getting in front of the shift to omnichannel collections.

Create a better consumer experience during the debt collection process When most people think about debt collection, unpleasant images may come to mind, like relentless phone calls or collections notices. Whatever the case may be, the collections process often ends in a less than desirable experience for consumers. And, quite frankly, it needs to change. Steve Platt, Experian’s Group President of Decision Analytics, recently spoke with American Banker regarding how banks and other financial institutions can create a better consumer experience during the debt collection process. While balancing consumer needs and managing rising delinquencies can be a complex challenge, Steve conveyed that the technology and analytics exist to simplify the process. As an industry, we’re at a point where customer acquisition costs far exceed the costs to nurture existing customers through the entire life-cycle - from application to repayment. So, suffice to say, lenders need to rethink how they engage and communicate with their customers. Technology to the rescue Luckily, we live in an era where troves and troves of data are made available every day. We just need to help lenders leverage it to its fullest extent. For example, the right data and technology can help answer questions, such as: What’s the most effective communication channel to reach a customer? When should you contact them? How often? There isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach to debt collection. Each customer is different. Each has their own unique situation. Effective debt collection is about knowing the difference between a customer who has simply forgotten to pay and those who may be struggling financially, and communicating with them accordingly. Go digital Part of knowing how to engage consumers is also understanding we live in a digital world. We perform many of our daily tasks through our mobile devices, desktops or tablets. So, it would make sense for lenders to help their customers manage their past-due accounts virtually. Imagine being able to negotiate payment dates and terms from the privacy of your own home. It just so happens that technology can make this a reality. At the end of the day, the customer needs to be at the heart of the collections strategy. Each customer needs to be communicated with on a case-by-case basis depending on their unique circumstances. The resources exist to make customers feel like individuals, rather than numbers in a spreadsheet. And the lenders that appeal to the customer’s experience will see lower charge-offs and higher customer retention.

At the end of July, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) took a significant step toward reforming the regulatory framework for the debt collection and debt buying industry by announcing an outline of proposals under consideration.  The proposals will now be considered by a small business review panel before the CFPB announces a proposed rule for wider industry comment. The CFPB said its proposals will affect only third-party debt collectors pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).  However, the CFPB signaled it may consider a separate set of proposals for first-party collectors. The collections industry has long been a focus of the CFPB.  In 2012, the bureau designated larger market participants in the debt collections marketplace and placed some of these entities under supervision. In 2013, the CFPB released an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking covering collections. The focus on debt collection is fueled in part by the large number of consumer complaints it receives about the debt collection market (roughly 35% of total complaints).  Moreover, the CFPB’s proposals build upon some of the regulatory and enforcement priorities that the CFPB and Federal Trade Commission have pursued for several years around data quality, consumer communication and disclosures. Here are some of the key takeaways for third party debt collectors from the CFPB’s proposals: Address data quality: Collectors would be required to substantiate claims that a consumer owes a debt in order to begin a collection. Collectors would also be required to pass on information provided by consumers in the course of collections activity. New Validation Notice and Statement of Rights: The CFPB’s draft outline would update the information provided to consumers through the FDCPA validation notice, as well as require disclosure of a consumer statement of rights. Changes to frequency of communications:  Debt collectors would be limited to six emails, phone calls or mailings per week, including unanswered calls and voicemails. After reaching the consumer, the debt collector would be allowed either one contact or three attempted contacts per week. There would also be a waiting period of 30 days before contacting the family of a debtor who has died. New disclosures on “out of statute” debt and litigation: In the outline, CFPB proposes having debt collectors provide new disclosures to consumers regarding the possibility of litigation and whether the debt is beyond the statute of limitations. Waiting period before sending collection accounts to  a consumer reporting agency: Reporting a person’s debt would be prohibited under the draft outline unless the collector has first communicated directly with the consumer about the debt. The CFPB will next hear comments from a panel of small businesses in the industry, complete an analysis of how its proposals would impact small businesses, and take written comments from the public. Following those steps, the agency will issue a proposed rule for comment.